Work—life research tends to privilege the organization—employee relationship, with the family's role largely relegated to providing emotional and material support to the employee and adapting to organizational requirements. Systems oriented research, however, points toward a larger role for the family, including mediating the employee's relationship with the organization as well as direct organizational interactions. This study uses Weick's model of organizational sensemaking to examine, through the analysis of employee and family interview accounts, how a global high-tech organization and its employees' families enact one another as environments. Three dynamics of mutual enactments— two cooperative and one competitive—were identified, along with implications for work—life integration research and practice, for more traditionally programmatic work—life accommodations, and for families' management of their relationships to employing organizations.
Allen, T.D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 58, 414-435.
2.
Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bailyn, L., Fletcher, J.K., & Kolb, D. (1997). Unexpected connections: Considering employees' personal lives can revitalize your business. Sloan Management Review, 38(4), 11-19.
4.
Bailyn, L., & Harrington, M. (2004). Redesigning work for work-family integration. Community, Work & Family, 7, 197-208.
5.
Barnett, R.C. (1998). Toward a review and reconceptualization of the work/family literature. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 124, 125-175.
6.
Batt, R., & Valcour, P.M. (2003). Human resources practices as predictors of work-family outcomes and employee turnover. Industrial Relations, 42, 189-220.
7.
Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S.M. (1985). Habits of the heart. New York : Harper & Row.
8.
Carlson, A.C. (1996). Gender, children, and social labor: Transcending the "family wage" dilemma. Journal of Social Issues, 52, 137-161.
9.
Cheney, G., Zorn, T.E., & Lair, D.J. (2008). Meaningful work and personal/social well being: Organizational communication engages the meanings of work. In C. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 32 (pp. 137-186). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Ciulla, J.B. (2000). The working life: The promise and betrayal of modern work. New York: Three Rivers Press.
11.
Clark, S.C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53, 747-770.
12.
Coser, L.A. (1974). Greedy institutions: Patterns of undivided commitment . New York: Free Press.
13.
Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in the age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
Deetz, S. (1997). The business concept and managerial control in knowledge-intensive work: A case study in discursive power. In B. D. Sypher (Ed.), Case studies in organizational communication (pp. 183-212). New York: Guilford .
16.
Farrell, A., & Geist-Martin, P. (2005). Communicating social health: Perceptions of wellness at work. Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 543-592.
17.
Fletcher, J.K., & Bailyn, L. (1996). Challenging the last boundary: Reconnecting work and family. In M. B. Arthur & D. M. Rouseau (Eds.), The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era (pp. 256-267). New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Friedman, S.D., Christensen, P., & DeGroot, J. (1998). Work and life: The end of the zero-sum game. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 119-129.
19.
Friedman, S.D., & Greenhaus, J.H. (2000). Work and family-allies or enemies? What happens when business professionals confront life choices . New York: Oxford University Press .
20.
Frye, N.K., & Breaugh, J.A. (2004). Family-friendly policies, supervisor support, workfamily conflict, family-work conflict, and satisfaction: A test of a conceptual model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(2), 197-220.
21.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
22.
Golden, A.G. (2002). Speaking of work and family: Spousal collaboration on defining role-identities and developing shared meanings. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 122-141.
23.
Golden, A.G., Kirby, E.L., & Jorgenson, J. (2006). Work-life research from both sides now: An integrative perspective for organizational and family communication. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 30 (pp. 143-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Halpern, D.F., & Murphy, S.E. (2005). From balance to interaction: Why the metaphor is important. In D. F. Halpern & S. E. Murphy (Eds.), From work-family balance to work-family interaction: Changing the metaphor (pp. 3-10). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Hill, E.J., Hawkins, A.J., Martinson, V., & Ferris, M. (2003). Studying "working fathers": Work-family conflict, fit, and adaptive strategies in a global high-tech company. Fathering, 3, 239-261.
26.
Hochschild, A.R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan .
27.
Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J.F. (2004). The active interview. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 140-161). London: Sage.
28.
Kirby, E.L. (2000). Should I do as you say, or do as you do? Mixed messages about work and family. The Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronique de Communication, 10(3). Retrieved August 18, 2007, from http://www.cios.org/www./ejcrec2.htm
29.
Kirby, E.L. (2006). "Helping you make room in your life for your needs": When organizations appropriate family roles. Communication Monographs, 73, 474-480.
30.
Kirby, E.L., & Krone, K.J. (2002). "The policy exists but you can't really use it": Communication and the structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50-77.
31.
Kossek, E.E., & Lambert, S.J. (2005). "Work-family scholarship": Voice and context. In E. E. Kossek & S. J. Lambert (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Kuhn, T. (2005). The institutionalization of Alta in organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly , 18, 618-627.
33.
Lewis, S., & Cooper, C.L. (2005). Work-life integration: Case studies of organisational change. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
34.
Lucas, K., & Buzzanell, P.M. (2006). Employees "without families": Discourses of family as an external constraint to work-life balance. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 335-352). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Medved, C.E., Brogan, S.M., McClanahan, A.M., Morris, J.F., & Shepherd, G.J. (2006). Family and work socializing communication: Messages, gender, and ideological implications. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 161-180.
36.
Moen, P., & Wethington, E. (1992). The concept of family adaptive strategies. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 233-251.
37.
Morgan, J.M., Reynolds, C.M., Nelson, T.J., Johanningmeier, A.R., Griffin, M., & Andrade, P. (2004). Tales from the fields: Sources of employee identification in agribusiness. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 360-395.
38.
Perlow, L.A. (1998). Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 328-357.
39.
Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2002, August 14). Family-friendly workplace. In Sloan Work and Family Research Network Work-Family Encyclopedia . Retrieved December 16, 2007, from http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/encyclopedia_entry.php?id=232
40.
Putnam, L.L. (1983). The interpretive perspective: An alternative to functionalism. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 31-54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Rapoport, R., Bailyn, L., Fletcher, J.K., & Pruitt, B.H. (2002). Beyond work-family balance: Advancing gender equity and workplace performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Taylor, J.R., Flanagin, A.J., Cheney, G., & Seibold, D.R. (2001). Organizational communication research: Key moments, central concerns, and future challenges. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 24 (pp. 99-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Thompson, C.A., Beauvais, L.L., & Lyness, K.S. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392-415.
45.
Voydanoff, P. (2002). Linkages between the work-family interface and work, family, and individual outcomes: An integrative model. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 138-164.
46.
Weber, M. (1996). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). Los Angeles: Roxbury. (Original work published 1905)
47.
Weick, K.E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York: Random House.
48.
Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409-421.
