Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Organization Studies, 53(9), 1125-1149.
2.
Barker, J.R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408-437.
3.
Barley, S.R., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 363-399.
4.
Bitzer, L.F. (1999). The rhetorical situation. In J. L. Lucaites, C. M. Condit, & S. Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary rhetorical theory: A reader (pp. 217-225). New York: Guilford.
5.
Burke, K. (1968). Counter-statement. Berkeley : University of California Press.
6.
Cheney, G. (1983). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication, Quarterly Journal of Speech , 69, 143-158.
7.
Conrad, C., & Malphers, R. (2008). Are we there yet? Are we there yet?Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1),123-146.
8.
Feldman, M.S., & Skoldberg, K. (2002). Stories and the rhetoric of contrariety: Subtexts of organizing (change). Culture and Organization, 8(4), 275-292.
9.
Green, S., Jr. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29, 653-669.
10.
Green, S., Jr., Babb, M., & Alpaslan, C.M. (2008). Institutional field dynamics and the competition between institutional logics: The role of rhetoric in the evolving control of the modern corporation. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 40-73.
11.
Hartelius, E.J., & Browning, L.D. (2008). The application of rhetorical theory in managerial research: A literature review. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 13-39.
12.
Heracleous, L., & Barrett, M. (2001). Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation . Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 755-778.
13.
Jarzabkowski, P., & Sillince, J.A.A. (2007). A rhetorical approach to building commitment to multiple strategic goals. Organization Studies, 28(11), 1639-1666.
14.
McLoughlin, I., & Badham, R. (2005). Political process perspectives on organization and technological change. Human Relations, 58, 827-843.
15.
Orlikowski, W.J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: Examining the structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541-574.
16.
Sillince, J.A.A. (2005). A contingency theory of rhetorical congruence . Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 608-621.
17.
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35-67.
18.
Symon, G. (2008). Developing the political perspective on technological change through rhetorical analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 74-98.
19.
Tompkins, P.K. (1987). Translating organizational theory: Symbolism over substance. In F. J. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts , & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 70-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Whittle, A., Mueller, F., & Mangan, A. (2008). "In search of subtlety": Discursive devices and rhetorical competences. Management Communication Quarterly , 22(1), 99-122.
