The author reconnects resistance in production to its radical roots. Current literature suggests that resistance in the liberal workplaces of late capitalism has gone underground, becoming mostly evident in unofficial, offstage practices such as cynicism, parody, and humor. The author argues this resistance is too often a decaf resistance. This is a resistance without the cost of radically changing the economy of enjoyment, which ties us to our master. The author argues that resistance, as a real act, which suspends and changes the constellation of power relations, has a cost that cannot be accounted for in advance. To understand this cost, we need an ethics, which the author calls, following Lacan, the Ethics of the Real.
Ackroyd, S., & Thompson, P. (1999). Organizational misbehaviour. London: Sage.
2.
Barker, J.R. (1999). The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control. London: Sage .
3.
Böhm, S. (2006). Repositioning organization theory: Impossibilities and strategies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
4.
Braverman, H. (1974). Labour and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
5.
Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufactory consent: Changes in the labour process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
6.
Collinson, D.L. (1992). Managing the shopfloor: Subjectivity, masculinity and workplace culture. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
7.
Collinson, D.L. (2003). Identities and insecurities: Selves at work. Organization, 10(3), 527-547.
8.
Collinson, D., & Ackroyd, S. (2005). Resistance, misbehaviour and dissent. In S. Ackroyd, P. Thompson, R. Batt, & P. S. Tolbert (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and organization (pp. 305-326). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
Contu, A., & Willmott, H. (2005). You spin me round: The realist turn in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1645-1662.
10.
Contu, A., & Willmott, H. (2006). Studying practice: Situating talking about machine . Organization Studies, 27(12), 1769-1782.
11.
De Cock, C., & Böhm, S. (2007). Liberalist fantasies: Zizek and the impossibility of the open society. Organization, 14, 815-836.
12.
Dean, J. (2005, September). Enjoyment as category for political theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
13.
Delbridge, R. & Ezzamel, M. (2005). The strength of difference: Contemporary conception of control. Organization, 12, 603-618.
14.
Evans, D. (1996). An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis . London: Routledge.
15.
Fleming, P. (2005). Metaphors of resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 45-66.
16.
Fleming, P., & Sewell, G. (2002). Looking for the good soldier Sveijk: Alternative modalities of resistance in the contemporary workplace. Sociology , 36(4), 857-874.
17.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003). Working at a cynical distance: Implications for power, subjectivity and resistance. Organization, 10(1), 157-180.
18.
Gabriel, Y. (1999). Beyond happy families: A critical re-evaluation of the control-resistance-identity triangle. Human Relations , 52, 179-203.
19.
Glynos, J. (2001). There is no other of the other: Symptoms of a decline in symbolic faith. Paragraph, 24, 78-110.
20.
Grugulis, I., Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (2001). The labour process debate. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(4), 3-132.
21.
Jermier, J. M., Knights, D., & Nord, W. (Eds.). (1994). Resistance and power in organizations. London: Routledge.
22.
Jones, C., & Spicer, A. (2005). The sublime object of entrepreneurship. Organization, 12, 223-246.
23.
Knights, D. (2001). Hanging out dirty washing: Labour process theory and its dualistic legacies. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(4), 68-84.
24.
Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (1990). The labour process debate. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, UK: MacMillan Press.
25.
Kondo, D. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a hi-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
27.
Lacan, J. (1992). The ethics of psychoanalysis 1959-1960: The seminar of Jacques Lacan (Jacques-Allen Miller, Ed.). London: Routledge.
28.
McKinlay, A., & Starkey, K. (1998). Foucault management and organization theory. London: Sage.
29.
Mumby, D.K. (2005). Theorizing resistance in organization studies: A dialectical approach. Management Communication Quarterly , 19, 1-26.
30.
O'Doherty, D., & Willmott, H. (2001). The question of subjectivity and the labour process . International Studies of Management & Organization , 30(4), 112-133.
31.
Prasad, A., & Prasad, P. (1998). Everyday struggles at the workplace: The nature and implications of routine resistance in contemporary organizations. In S. B. Andrews & D. Knoke (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations , Vol. 16. (pp. 225-257). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
32.
Prasad, A., & Prasad, P. (1998). Stretching the iron cage: The constitution and implications of routine workplace resistance. Organization Science, 11, 387.
33.
Putnam, L., Grant, D., Michelson, G., & Cutcher, L. (2005). Discourse and resistance: Targets, practices, and consequences. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 5-18.
34.
Scott, J.C. (1990). Domination and the art of resistance: Hidden transcripts . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
Sewell, G. (1998). The discipline of team: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly,43(2), 397-429.
36.
Starkey, K., & Hatchuel, A. (2002). The long detour: Foucault's history of desire and pleasure. Organization, 9(4), 641-656.
37.
Thompson, P. (1990). Crawling from the wreckage: The labour process and the politics of production. In D. Knights & H. Willmott (Eds.), Labour process theory (pp. 95-124). London: Macmillan.
38.
Thompson, P., & Ackroyd, S. (1995). All quiet on the workplace front? A critique of recent trends in British industrial sociology. Sociology, 29(4), 615-633.
39.
Willmott, H. (1993). Breaking the paradigm mentality. Organization Studies, 14(5), 681-720.
40.
Zizek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
41.
Zizek, S. (1994). The metastases of enjoyment: Six essays on woman and causality. London: Verso.
42.
Zizek, S. (1997). The plague of fantasies. London : Verso.
43.
Zizek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London: Verso.
44.
Zizek, S. (2001). Did somebody say totalitarianism?London: Verso.
45.
Zizek, S. (2005). Interrogating the real ( R. Butler & Stephens Eds.). London: Continuum.
46.
Zizek, S. (2006). The parallax view. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
Zizek, S., & Daly, G. (2004). Conversations with Zizek. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
