Reinventing the Public Intellectual Through Communication Dialogue Civic Capacity Building

Alcoff, L.M. (2002). Does the public intellectual have intellectual integrity? Metaphilosophy, 33, 521-534.

Bokeno, R.M. , & Gantt, V.W. (2000). Dialogic mentoring. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 237-270.

Carter, D. (2001, September). Public intellectuals, book culture and civil society. Australian Humanities Review. Retrieved December 4, 2006, from http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/AHR/archive/Issue-September-2001/carter2.html

Cissna, K.N. , & Anderson, R. (2004). Public dialogue and intellectual history. In R. Anderson , L. A. Baxter , & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 193-207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cummings, D. (Ed.). (2004). The changing role of the public intellectual. London: Sage. Cushman, E. (1999). The public intellectual, service learning, and activist research. College English, 61(3), 328-336.

Donatich, J. , Jacoby, R. , Elshtain, J.B. , Carter, S. , Gans, H. , Johnson, S. , et al. (2001, February 12). The future of the public intellectual: A forum. The Nation. Retrieved November 13, 2006, from http://www.thenation.com/doc/20010212/forum

Dunlop, T. (2003). If you build it they will come: Blogging and the new citizenship. Retrieved November 13, 2006, from http://evatt.labor.net. au/publications/papers/91.html

Etzioni, A. , & Bowditch, A. (Eds.). (2006). Public intellectuals: An endangered species? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon .

Foucault, M. (1988). The concern for truth. In L. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977-1984 (pp. 255-267). New York: Routledge.

Fuller, S. , & Collier, J.H. (2004). Philosophy, rhetoric, and the end of knowledge: A new beginning for science and technology studies (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .

Giroux, H.A. (2003). Betraying the intellectual tradition: Public intellectuals and the crisis of youth. Language and Intercultural Communication , 3, 172-186.

Goodson, I. (1999). The educational researcher as public intellectual . British Educational Research Journal, 25, 277-297.

Heath, R.L. , Pearce, W.B. , Shotter, J. , Taylor, J.R. , Kersten, A. , Zorn, T. , et al. (2006). The processes of dialogue: Participation and legitimation. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 341-375.

Kelsey, J. (1999). Reclaiming the future: New Zealand and the global economy. Wellington: Bridget Williams .

Kingston, R. , & Levine, P. (2004) What is “public” about what academics do? An exchange. In D . W. Brown & D. Witte (Eds.), Higher education exchange (pp. 17-29). Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.

Kurzman, C. , & Owens, L. (2002). The sociology of intellectuals. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 63-90.

Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality . Studies in Political Economy, 63, 5-25.

Mayhew, L.H. (1997). The new public: Professional communication and the means of social influence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ministry of Research, Science, & Technology. (2006). Dialogue fund. Retrieved January 26, 2007, from http://www.morst.govt.nz/current-work/science-in-society/dialogue/fund/

O'Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.

Pearce, W.B. , & Pearce, K.A. (2004). Taking a communication perspective on dialogue . In R. Anderson , L. A Baxter , & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 39-56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Phillips, J. (1996). A man's country? The image of the Pakeha male—A history. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin.

Posner, R. (2002). Public intellectuals: A study of decline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Prebble, R. (Ed.). (2000). Designer genes: The New Zealand guide to the issues, facts and theories about genetic engineering. Wellington, New Zealand: Dark Horse.

Roper, J. , Zorn, T. , & Weaver, C.K. (2004). Science dialogues: The communicative properties of science and technology dialogue. Hamilton, New Zealand: Department of Management Communication, University of Waikato.

Tannen, D. (1999). The argument culture: Moving from debate to dialogue . New York: Ballantine.

Wynne, B. (2001). Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture, 10(4), 445-481.

Zorn, T. , Roper, J. , Broadfoot, K. , & Weaver, C.K. (2006). Focus groups as sites of influential interaction: Building communicative self-efficacy and effecting attitudinal change in discussing controversial topics. Journal of Applied Communication Research , 34, 115-140.