Brummans, B. H. J. M. (2004). Dispositional reflections. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
2.
Brummans, B. H. J. M. (in press). The Montreal school and the question of agency. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor,& E. J. VanEvery (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: The domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law(Ed.), Power, action and belief(pp. 196-233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4.
Carayol, V. (2004). Communication organisationnelle: Une perspective allagmatique[Organizational communication: An allagmatic perspective]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
5.
Collins, R. (2000). The sociology of philosophies: A précis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 30, 157-201.
6.
Corman, S. R.,& Poole, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). Perspectives on organizational communication: Finding common ground. New York: Guilford.
7.
Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
8.
Gramaccia, G. (2001). Les actes de langage dans les organisations[Speech acts in organizations]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
9.
Hotier, H. (Ed.). (2000). Non verbal et organisation[Non verbal and organization]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
10.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599-620.
14.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Prichard, C. (2002). Creative selves? Critically reading “creativity” in management discourse. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11, 265-276.
16.
Putnam, L. L., & Pacanowsky, M. E. (1983). Communication and organizations. An interpretive approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Redding, W. C. (1985). Stumbling toward identity: The emergence of organizational communication as a field of study. In R. D. McPhee & P. K. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and newdirections(pp. 15-54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Taylor, J. R. (2005). Forum response: In praise of ambiguity. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 299-306.
19.
Van Maanen, J. (1995). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6, 133-143.