Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Abbott, A. (2004). Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. New York: Norton.
3.
Corman, S. R. (2004). Postpositivism. In S. May & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 15-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Corman, S. R., & Poole, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). Perspectives on organizational communication: Finding common ground. New York: Guilford.
5.
Corman, S. R., & Scott, C. R. (1994). Perceived communication relationships, activity foci, and observable communication in collectives. Communication Theory, 4, 171-190.
6.
Miller, K. I. (2000). Common ground from the post-positivist perspective: From “straw person” argument to collaborative coexistence. In S.R. Corman & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational communication: Finding common ground (pp. 46-67). New York: Guilford.
7.
Putnam, L. L. (1983). The interpretive perspective: An alternative to functionalism. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication in organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 31-54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Putnam, L. L., & Pacanowsky, M. E. (Eds.). (1983). Communication in organizations: An interpretive approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Taylor, J., Flanagin, A. J., Cheney, G., & Seibold, D. R. (2000). Organizational communication research: Key moments, central concerns, and future challenges. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 24 (pp. 99-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.