Amason, P. A. , Watkins, M., & Homes, S. A. (1999). Social support and acculturative stress in the multicultural workplace. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 310-334.
2.
Barker, V. , Giles, H., Noels, K., Duck, J., Hecht, M., & Clement, R. (2001). The English-only movement: A communication analysis of changing perceptions of language vitality. Journal of Communication, 51, 3-38.
3.
Blake, K. (1997). Laws mandating exclusive use of English in workplace sparks debate, new solutions. Nation’s Restaurant News, 31 (8), 56-56.
4.
Brady, T. (1996). The downside of diversity. HR Focus, 73(8), 22-23.
5.
Dicker, S. J. (1998). Adaptation and assimilation: U.S. business responses to linguistic diversity in the workplace. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 19, 282-302.
6.
Fink, R. L. , Robinson, R. K., & Wyld, D. C. (1996). English-only work rules: Balancing fair employment considerations in a multicultural and multilingual healthcare workforce. Hospital & Health Services Administration, 41, 473-483.
7.
Flynn, G. (1995). English-only rules can cause legal tongue ties. Personnel Journal, 74(11), 87-92.
8.
Graham, J. L. , & Herberger, R. A., Jr. (1987). Negotiators abroad—Don’t shoot from the hip. In L. Luce & E. Smith (Eds.), Toward internationalism: Readings in cross-cultural communication (pp. 73-87). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
9.
Johnson, F. L. (2000). Speaking culturally: Language diversity in the United States. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Judd, E. L. (1987). The English language amendment: A case study on language and politics. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 113-135.
11.
Kaplan, R. B. , & Baldauf, R. B., Jr. (2001). Not only English: English only and the world. In B. Schiefflin, K. Woodard, P. Kroskrity, & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language ideologies: Critical perspectives on the official English movement (pp. 293-315). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Lippi-Green, R. (1994). Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts. Language in Society, 23, 163-198.
13.
Murphy, B. S. , Barlow, W. E., & Hatch, D. D. (1993). Manager’s newsfront: English-only rules might not violate Civil Rights Act. Personnel Journal, 72(10), 24-24.
14.
Pan, B. A. (1995). Code negotiation in bilingual families: My body starts speaking English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 16, 315-327.
15.
Parliman, G. C. , & Shoeman, R. J. (1994). National origin discrimination or employer prerogative? An analysis of language rights in the workplace. Employee Relations Legal Journal, 19(4), 551-565.
16.
Petersen, D. J. (1994). English only rules: Valid business policy or discrimination?Labor Law Journal, 46, 367-373.
17.
Schecter, S. R. , & Bayley, R. (1997). Language socialization practices and cultural identity: Case studies of Mexican-descent families in California and Texas. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 513-541.
18.
Schemo, D. J. (2001, April 16). Language lag hurting U.S., experts say. Chicago Tribune, Section 1, p. 4-4.
19.
Sklarewitz, N. (1992, Fall). American firms lash out at foreign tongues. Business and Society Review, 83, 24-28.
20.
Sonntag, M. , & Pool, A. (1987). Linguistic denial and linguistic self-denial: American ideologies of language. Language Problems and Language Planning, 11, 46-65.
21.
Tarver, H. (1989). Language and politics in the 1980s: The story of U.S. English. Politics and Society, 17, 225-245.
22.
Thomas, R. R., Jr. , & Gregory, T. A. (1994). A diversity perspective on the language challenge. Employment Relations Today, 20(4), 363-376.
23.
Wiley, T. G. , & Lukes, M. (1996). English-only and standard English ideologies in the U.S. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 511-535.
