Previous researchers have considered the nature of dissent as well as the audiences to whom employees express dissent. Absent in these treatments is a specific focus on the actual dissent strategies that employees use. The purpose of this study was to assess strategies employees use to express upward dissent within contemporary organizations. Employees completed a survey instrument that asked them to provide a dissent account. Five distinct strategies emerged from an interpretive thematic analysis of the accounts. Results indicated that employees used direct-factual appeal, repetition, solution presentation, circumvention, and threatening-resignation strategies for expressing upward dissent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cannings, K. (1992). The voice of the loyal manager: Distinguishing attachment from commitment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5, 261-272.
2.
Cotton, J. L. (1993). Employee involvement: Methods for improving performance and work attitudes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Farrell, D. (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 596-607.
4.
Farrell, D. , & Rusbult, C. E. (1992). Exploring the exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect typology: The influence of job satisfaction, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5, 201-218.
5.
Glaser, B. , & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
6.
Gorden, W. I. (1988). Range of employee voice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 283-299.
7.
Gorden, W. I. , Infante, D. A., & Graham, E. E. (1988). Corporate conditions conducive to employee voice: A subordinate perspective. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1, 73-83.
8.
Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 1-52). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
9.
Graham, J. W. , & Keeley, M. (1992). Hirschman’s loyalty construct. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5, 191-200.
10.
Hegstrom, T. G. (1990). Mimetic and dissent conditions in organizational rhetoric. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 18, 141-152.
11.
Hegstrom, T. G. (1995). Focus on organizational dissent: A functionalist response to criticism. In J. Lehtonen (Ed.), Critical perspectives on communication research and pedagogy (pp. 83-94). St. Ingbert, Germany: Rohrig University Press.
12.
Hegstrom, T. G. (1999). Reasons for rocking the boat: Principles and personal problems. In H. K. Geissner, A. F. Herbig, & E. Wessela (Eds.), Business communication in Europe (pp. 179-194). Tostedt, Germany: Attikon Verlag.
13.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Kassing, J. W. (1997). Articulating, antagonizing, and displacing: A model of employee dissent. Communication Studies, 48, 311-332.
15.
Kassing, J. W. (1998). Development and validation of the organizational dissent scale. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(2), 183-229.
16.
Kassing, J. W. (2000a). Exploring the relationship between workplace freedom of speech, organizational identification, and employee dissent. Communication Research Reports, 17, 387-396.
17.
Kassing, J. W. (2000b). Investigating the relationship between superior-subordinate relationship quality and employee dissent. Communication Research Reports, 17, 58-70.
18.
Kassing, J. W. (2001). From the look of things: Assessing perceptions of organizational dissenters. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 442-470.
19.
Kassing, J. W. , & Armstrong, T. A. (2001). Examining the association of job tenure, employment history, and organizational status with employee dissent. Communication Research Reports, 18, 264-273.
20.
Kassing, J. W. , & Avtgis, T. A. (1999). Examining the relationship between organizational dissent and aggressive communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(1), 76-91.
21.
Kassing, J. W. , & Avtgis, T. A. (2001). Dissension in the organization as a function of control expectancies. Communication Research Reports, 18, 118-127.
22.
Krone, K. J. (1992). A comparison of organizational, structural, and relationship effects on subordinates’upward influence choices. Communication Quarterly, 40, 1-15.
23.
Leck, J. D. , & Saunders, D. M. (1992). Hirschman’s loyalty: Attitude or behavior?Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5, 219-230.
24.
Pacanowsky, M. E. (1988). Communication in the empowering organization. Communication Yearbook, 11, 356-379.
25.
Rusbult, C. , & Lowery, D. (1985). When bureaucrats get the blues: Responses to dissatisfaction among federal employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 80-103.
26.
Spencer, D. G. (1986). Employee voice and employee retention. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 488-502.
27.
Sprague, J. A. , & Ruud, G. L. (1988). Boat-rocking in the high technology culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 169-193.
28.
Stewart, L. P. (1980). “Whistle blowing”: Implications for organizational communication. Journal of Communication, 30(4), 90-101.
29.
Stohl, C. , & Cheney, G. (2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 349-407.
30.
Waldron, V. R. (1991). Achieving communication goals in superior-subordinate relationships: The multi-functionality of upward maintenance tactics. Communication Monographs, 58, 289-306.
31.
Westin, A. F. (1986). Professional and ethical dissent: Individual, corporate and social responsibility. Technology in Society, 8, 335-339.
