RamanJD, PearleMS. Management options for lower pole renal calculi. Curr Opin Urol2008;18(2):214–219; doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f517ea
2.
GeraghtyR, PietropaoloA, TzelvesL, et al.Which measure of stone burden is the best predictor of interventional outcomes in urolithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis by the YAU Urolithiasis Working Group and EAU Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol Open Sci2025;71:22–30; doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.024
3.
PanthierF, KutchukianS, DucoussoH, et al.How to estimate stone volume and its use in stone surgery: A comprehensive review. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed)2024;48(1):71–78; doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.08.009
4.
CumpanasAD, ChantadulyC, MorganKL, et al.Efficient and accurate computed tomography–based stone volume determination: Development of an automated artificial intelligence algorithm. J Urol2024;211(2):256–265; doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003766
5.
FinchW, JohnstonR, ShaidaN, WinterbottomA, WisemanO. Measuring stone volume—Three-dimensional software reconstruction or an Ellipsoid algebra formula? BJU Int2014;113(4):610–614; doi: 10.1111/bju.12456
6.
LavasaniSAM, AliA, SaadatS, et al.IP06-21 assessment of the accuracy of 3D Slicer vs. ellipsoid formulae for stone volume measurement: Size matters!J Urol2025;213(5S). Available from: https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/01.JU.0001109820.51058.5a.21 [Accessed May 23, 2025].
7.
FedorovA, BeichelR, Kalpathy-CramerJ, et al.3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging2012;30(9):1323–1341; doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
8.
Baldwin, D. Daniel, Sajdak, Grant, Farkouh, Ala’a, et al.MP25-02 leave no stone unmeasured: A comparison of three methods for determining stone volume. J Endourol2024;38(S1):A276; doi: 10.1089/end.2024.38524.abstracts
9.
PauchardF, PanthierF, EspinozaC, VejarN, VentimigliaE, TraxerO. Comparison of measurement methods for stone volume estimation: An in vitro study. J Endourol2025;39(5):488–493; doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0524
10.
PanthierF, AlvarezE, GauharV, et al.Stone volume instead of maximum stone diameter: Results from an international survey. BJU Int2025;136(1):95–102; doi: 10.1111/bju.16693
