This study investigates the efficacy of an innovative anatomical enucleation prostate technique, utilizing a low-energy pulsed thulium:YAG laser emission, to spare the ventral urethral plate (or “lissosphincter”) and the ejaculatory hoods in 50 patients with high-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The primary aim was to assess its impact on preserving antegrade ejaculation while obtaining relief from obstruction.
Materials and Methods:
In this prospective study, 50 patients were evaluated using the following validated instruments: the International Prostate Symptom Index (IPSS), Quality of Life (QoL) score, and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculatory Dysfunction Short Form (MSHQ-EjD SF). Assessments were performed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperation.
Results
: Significant improvements were observed postoperatively in functional outcomes: IPSS decreased from 20.42 to 5.76, and QoL score improved from 4.2 to 1.2 (both p < 0.001, if significant). Mean Qmax significantly increased from 8.11 mL/min preoperatively to 20.6 mL/min at 6 months (p < 0.001), accompanied by a significant reduction in postvoid residual (PVR) volume. Crucially, antegrade ejaculation was preserved. While MSHQ-EjD SF analysis indicated a nonsignificant reduction in semen volume (Item 3), other parameters, including ejaculation frequency (Item 1), strength of expulsion (Item 2), and bother/satisfaction (Item 4), were not significantly modified, but the patients were satisfied.
Conclusion:
The ejaculation-sparing pulsed thulium:YAG laser anatomical enucleation technique shows promising results for preserving antegrade ejaculatory function (70% preservation rate) while achieving effective relief of cervico-prostatic obstruction. However, these preliminary findings from a limited cohort require validation through larger, randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up before establishing this technique as a standard approach for ejaculation preservation in BPH operations.
HofnerK, ClaesH, De ReijkeTM, FolkestadB, SpeakmanMJ. Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily: Effect on sexual function in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. Eur. Urol, 1999; 36(4):335–341; doi: 10.1159/000019996
2.
HisasueS-I, FuruyaR, ItohN, et al.Ejaculatory disorder caused by alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists is not retrograde ejaculation but a loss of seminal emission. Int J Urol, 2006; 13(10):1311–1316; doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01535.x
3.
SolomonHM, WierPJ, IppolitoDL, ToscanoTV. Effect of prazosin on sperm transport in male rats. Reprod Toxicol, 1997; 11(4):627–631.5; doi: 10.1016/s0890-6238(97)00022-1
4.
KediaKR, PerskyL. Effect of phenoxybenzamine (dibenzyline) on sexual function in man. Urology, 1981; 18(6):620–621; doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(81)90474-x
5.
RonzoniG, De VecchisM. Preservation of anterograde ejaculation after transurethral resection of both the prostate and bladder neck. Br J Urol, 1998; 81(6):830–833; doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00658.x
6.
AlloussiSH, LangC, EichelR, AlloussiS. Ejaculation-preserving transurethral resection of prostate and bladder neck: Short- and long-term results of a new innovative resection technique. J Endourol, 2014; 28(1):84–89; doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0093
7.
TalabSS, Santiago-LastraYA, BachmannA, et al.V403 the impact of ejaculation-preserving photo-selective vaporization of the prostate (EP-PVP) on lower urinary tract symptoms and ejaculatory function: Results of a multicenter study. J Urol, 2013; 189:e164.
8.
KimM, SongSH, KuJH, KimHJ, PaickJS. Pilot study of the clinical efficacy of ejaculatory hood sparing technique for ejaculation preservation in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Int J Impot Res, 2015; 27(1):20–24; doi: 10.1038/ijir.2014.22
9.
RoehrbornCG, BarkinJ, GangeSN, et al.Five year results of the prospective randomized controlled prostatic urethral L.I.F.T. study. Can J Urol, 2017; 24(3):8802–8813.
10.
GratzkeC, BarberN, SpeakmanMJ, et al.Prostatic urethral lift vs transurethral resection of the prostate: 2-year results of the BPH6 prospective, multicentre, randomized study. BJU Int, 2017; 119(5):767–775; doi: 10.1111/bju.13714
11.
PiscoJ, BilhimT, PinheiroLC, FernandesL, PereiraJ, CostaNV, DuarteM, OliveiraAG. Prostate embolization as an alternative to open surgery in patients with large prostate and moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016; 27(5):700–708; doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.01.138
12.
MynderseLA, HansonD, RobbRA, et al.Rezūm system water vapor treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia: Validation of convective thermal energy transfer and characterization with magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional renderings. Urology, 2015; 86(1):122–127; doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.021
13.
MigliariR, MeleF, BaraleM, De RosaG, MigliariM, GiacobbeA. An innovative technique for ejaculation-sparing prostatic enucleation with thulium:YAG Laser. J Endourol, 2023; 37(12):1282–1288.
14.
ChiaSJ, HengCT, ChanSP, FooKT. Correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion with bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int, 2003; 91(4):371–374; doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04088.x
15.
HashmatAI, HakimLS. Antegrade ejaculation following transurethral laser ablation of the prostate. J Androl, 1994; 15 Suppl(Suppl 6):28S–30S.
16.
LangC, EichelR, AlloussiSH, AlloussiS. Ejaculation preserving (EP) technique in endourological treatment of laser vapor resection and EPTUR of the prostate. Eur Urol Suppl, 2009; 8(4):385.
17.
ChandrasekeraS, De ZylvaS, LamahewageN, KulasingheM. Ejaculation preserving transurethral resection of prostate: A pilot study. J Urol, 2012; 187(Suppl 4):e813.
18.
TabatabaeiS, ChoiB, MuirG. Ejaculation-preserving photoselective vaporization of prostate (EP-PVP): six years experience from a multi-centre study. J Urol, 2011; 185(Suppl 4):e910–e911.
19.
LeonardiR. Preliminary results on selective light vaporization with the side-firing 980 nm diode laser in benign prostatic hyperplasia: An ejaculation sparing technique. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2009; 12(3):277–280; doi: 10.1038/pcan.2009.5
20.
YangSSD, TsaiYC, ChenJJ, PengCH, HsiehJH, WangCC. Modified transurethral incision of the bladder neck treating primary bladder neck obstruction in young men: A method to improve voiding function and to preserve antegrade ejaculation. Urol Int, 2008; 80(1):26–30; doi: 10.1159/000111725Epub 2008 Jan 18
21.
KoraitimMM. The male urethral sphincter complex revisited: An anatomical concept and its physiological correlate. J Urol, 2008; 179(5):1683–1689; doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.010
22.
BrigantiA, NasproR, GallinaA, et al.Impact on sexual function of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: Results of a prospective, 2‐center, randomized trial. J Urol, 2006; 175(5):1817–1821; doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00983-3
23.
JaidaneM, ArfaNB, HmidaW, HidoussiA, SlamaA, SorbaNB, MosbahF. Effect of transurethral resection of the prostate on erectile function: A prospective comparative study. Int J Impot Res, 2010; 22(2):146–151; doi: 10.1038/ijir.2009.56
24.
JeongMS, HaSB, LeeCJ, ChoMC, KimSW, PaickJS. Serial changes in sexual function following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A short‐term follow‐up study. Korean J Urol, 2012; 53(2):104–108; doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.2.104
25.
NasproR, BachmannA, GillingP, et al.A review of the recent evidence (2006‐2008) for 532‐nm photoselective laser vaporisation and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Eur Urol, 2009; 55(6):1345–1357; doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.070
26.
GillingP, AndersonP, TanA. Aquablation of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 1-year results. J Urol, 2017; 197(6):1565–1572; doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.056
27.
DesaiM, BidairM, BhojaniN, et al.Aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia in large prostates (80-150 cc): 1-year results. Urology, 2019; 129:1–7; doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.029
28.
KellnerDS, ArmitageJ, BelkovskyM, ChughtaiB, DeE. Ejaculatory preserving holmium laser enucleation of the median lobe: Preserving sexual function while improving urinary outcomes. Urology, 2023; 173:213–218; doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.01.030
29.
BozziniG, BertiL, MaltagliatiM, et al.Ejaculation-sparing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES-ThuLEP): Outcomes on a large cohort. World J Urol, 2021; 39(6):2029–2035; doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03442-2
30.
PradereB, UleriA, BruguièreE, MisraiV. Exploration of the ejaculatory anatomy concept: The EJAC study. Eur Urol, 2025; 87(2):S0302–S152; doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.08.001
31.
LebdaiS, Ben BoujemaM, BenardA, et al.Standardized technique for ejaculation preservation during prostatic endoscopic ablative surgery. World J Urol, 2023; 41(11):3041–3049; doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04592-9
32.
De MenezesHB, SampaioFJB, De ResendeJAD, VieiralvesRR, Da SilvaFS, AlvesE, FavoritoLA. Anatomic study of verumontanum during endoscopic surgeries in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int Braz J Urol, 2021; 47(2):308–321; doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0055
33.
KoraitimM, SchaferW, MelchiorH, LutzeyerW. Dynamic activity of bladder neck and external sphincter in ejaculation. Urology, 1977; 10(2):130–132; doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(77)90010-3
34.
de CarvalhoFL, FacioFNJr, YoshinagaEM, et al.Anatomic study of verumontanum during endoscopic surgeries in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int Braz J Urol, 2021; 47(2):352–363; doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0192
35.
ShafikA, El-SibaiO, ShafikAA. Dynamic activity of bladder neck and external sphincter in ejaculation. Arch Androl, 1977; 14(2–3):209–212; doi: 10.3109/01485017708988794
36.
NguyenDD, MantriSS, ZornKC, et al.Which anatomic structures should be preserved during aquablation contour planning to optimize ejaculatory function? A case-control study using ultrasound video recordings to identify surgical predictors of postoperative anejaculation. Urology, 2021; 153:250–255; doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.10.016
37.
ElshazlyM, SultanS, ShabanM, ZanatyF. Evaluation of a novel technique of bladder neck and supramontanal sparing ejaculatory preserving transurethral prostatectomy. World J Urol, 2021; 39(11):4215–4219; doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03752-z
38.
ShafikA, ShafikAA, El SibaiO, ShafikIA. Contractile activity of the prostate at ejaculation: An electrophysiologic study. Arch Androl, 2006; 52(3):165–172; doi: 10.1080/01485010500408863
39.
ClementP, GiulianoF. Physiology and pharmacology of ejaculation. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 2016; 119(Suppl 3):18–25; doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12546
40.
SibonaM, DestefanisP, VercelliE, et al.Ejaculation physiology and dysfunction after BPH surgery: The role of the new MISTs. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2023; 26(3):475–482; doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00686-y
