Compression modulus and strength have been measured for unidirectional carbon fiber/thermoplastic matrix composites Values obtained from the use of a Northrop loading fixture are compared to those from an IITRI fixture Low Northrop modulus values are explained using buckling theory and the effect of fiber curvature within the lam inate. Also, data are compared tor composites with different fiber forms with emphasis on fiber curvature.
References
1.
Chamis, C.C.1974Composite Materials, Vol V, "Fracture and Fatigue ," L J Broutman, ed New YorkAcademic Press, p 109
2.
Chamis, C.C. and J.H. Sinclair1985Journal of Composites Technology and Research, 7 129
3.
Whitney, J.M. , L.M. Daniel and R.B. Pipes1982Experimental Mechanics of Fiber-Reinforced Composite MaterialsEnglewood Cliffs, NJPrentice-Hall , p 179
4.
Sih, C C and A M Skudra , eds 1985 "Failure Mechanics of Composites," Handbook of Composites, Vol III NYElsevier, p. 230
5.
Timoshenko, S.1941Strength of Materials, Vol II New YorkVan Nostrand, p 184.
6.
Lee, R.J.1987. Composites, 18:35
7.
1982ASTM D3140-82, Philadelphia, PAASTM
8.
Greszczuk, L.B. "Failure Mechanies of Composites Subjected to Compressive Loading," AFML-TR-71-107, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH
9.
Gutowski, T.G. , J. Kingery and D. Boucher1988SPE ANTEC Technical Papers, 34.1313.
10.
Timoshenko, S.1936Theory of Elastic StabilityNYMcGraw-Hill, p 31
11.
Van Vlack, L.H.1980Elements of Material Science and EngineeringReading, MAAddison-Wesley, p 522
12.
13.
Dale, W.C. and E. Baer1974J Mater Sci, 9(3) 369
14.
Silverman, E.M. and R.M. Jones1988SAMPE J , 24(4) 33
