Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Fullerene has been acknowledged as a significant nanocarbon nanofiller enhancing the imperative polymer characteristics. Since, thermoplastic polymers constitute a large group of polymeric materials, fullerene has been used as reinforcement in these matrices mostly via non-covalent means. This state-of-the-art review article summarizes thermoplastic polymer nanocomposites reinforced with fullerene nano-additives without involving any covalent interactions. Accordingly, thermoplastic polymer/fullerene nanocomposites of interest have non-covalent or physical interactions in the matrix-nanofiller such as van der Waals forces, electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and aromatic stacking interactions. Number of thermoplastic polymers including polyamide, polyurethanes, and block copolymers have been non-covalently or physically reinforced with the fullerene molecules. Ensuing high performance thermoplastic polymer/fullerene nanocomposites exhibited improved microstructure, electrical, mechanical, thermal, and other physical properties. Enhancements in the thermal, mechanical, and electrical properties of the thermoplastic/fullerene nanomaterials were found dependent upon the nanofiller contents, orientations, interfacial effects, and processing. Consequently, the polyamide/fullerene systems were found efficient to enhance the glass transition up to 260°C, in addition to optimum mechanical properties. Polyurethane/fullerene systems performed better for improved tensile strength and young’s modulus features up to 90 MPa and 48 GPa, respectively. System based on poly (methyl methacrylate) and fullerene has resulted in high thermal degradation temperature in the range of 501-633°C with fine electrical conductivity of 1.3 Scm⁻¹. Using combination of fullerene and graphene nanofiller (due to synergistic effects) has been found to improve the electrical conductivity considerably in the range of 1.8–2.5 Scm⁻¹ for a polystyrene and block copolymer system. However, attaining fine fullerene nanoparticle dispersion of non-covalently reinforced matrices have been found important affecting the final nanocomposite properties. Consequently, processability and essential characteristics of non-covalently fullerene filled nanocomposites can be influenced due to nanoparticle aggregation. Hence, the physical property enhancement potential of physical linking between the non-covalently linked thermoplastics-fullerene has been portrayed in this article. Research on non-covalently interacted thermoplastic polymer/fullerene nanocomposites revealed technical potential ranging from energy/electronic devices to engineering and biomedical sectors. This review article can be a useful guide for the field researchers towards the development of advanced systems using non-covalently linked polymer/fullerene nanomaterials for future technical applications.

Keywords

Fullerene non-covalent thermoplastic nanocomposite dispersion physical properties

Introduction

Continuous development of innovative polymeric nanocomposites has been the foremost focus of modern technologies.¹ In this context, various nanoparticles have been used as the nanocomposite reinforcements. Important properties of the resultant nanocomposites greatly rely on the nanofiller dispersions in the nanocomposite matrices to enhance the ultimate industrial or engineering utilizations.² Nanofiller addition has been found to directly influence the indispensable physical features of the nanocomposites such as electrical conduction, heat stability, mechanical robustness, flame retardance, barrier, anti-corrosion, and several other physical characters.³ Use of nanocarbon nanofillers have been widely explored and found beneficial for developing high performance polymeric nanocomposites.⁴ Among carbon nanoparticles, fullerene has gained attention owing to zero dimensional nature, unique features, and property improvement of polymeric matrices.^5,6 Consequently, fullerene nanocomposites have been developed with variety of thermoplastics, thermosets, rubbers and conducting polymer matrices. As thermoplastics constitutes large important category of polymers, fullerene has been reinforced in these polymers, mostly developing the non-covalent interactions.⁷ Nevertheless, some reports of covalent linking of functional fullerene molecules have been observed for thermoplastic polymers. Among non-covalent or physical interactions, fullerene molecules have been interacted with polymer matrices through various weak links. The final nanocomposite properties (microstructure, mechanical, thermal, conducting, etc.) have been found greatly dependent on interactions among thermoplastic-fullerene as well as the nanoparticle dispersal for further utilizations.^8–10 As the physical interactions especially hydrogen bonding, electrostatic associations, dipole links, and aromatic stacking have been found beneficial to enhance the important physical characters of the thermoplastic polymer/fullerene nanocomposites, so, the potential of these nanocomposites has been enhanced towards practical applications electronics, engineering, transpiration, and biomedical field.⁸

This state-of-the-art overview basically highpoints the importance of non-covalently linked or physically reinforced thermoplastic polymer/fullerene nanocomposites. Various fullerene reinforced thermoplastic matrices have been surveyed to explore the effect of non-covalent linking in these innovative nanocomposites. To the best of the knowledge, this cutting-edge review is novel in literature due to its innovative outline and framework including best available literature so far. This article is definitely helpful for the field scientists, engineers, and academics to understand the importance of non-covalent interactions in developing high performance polymer/fullerene nanomaterials.

Fullerene

Fullerene molecules are hollow spherical caged nanocarbons.^11,12 It is a zero dimensional nanostructure. Fullerenes are five/six atom based polygons observed in 1985.¹³ It can be imagined as a rounded graphene nanosheet with sp² hybridized atoms.¹⁴ Subsequently, alternating single and double bonds have been found responsible for π delocalization in fullerene rings.¹⁵ Fullerene molecules may have different number of carbon atoms in the rings.¹⁶ Smallest fullerene observed is C₂₀ having 20 carbon atoms in spherical structure.¹⁷ Then higher fullerene have been developed like C_28, C_30, C_60, C_70, etc.¹⁸ Fullerene C₆₀ is the most symmetrical molecule commonly referred as Buckminster fullerene.^19,20 Technological applications of fullerene have been explored for varying engineering and energy fields.²¹

Dispersion Properties of Carbon Nanoparticles in Polymer Matrices

Fullerene and quantum dots are spherical nanoparticles with zero dimensions.^22–24 Nanocarbons with other dimensionalities have been observed like one dimensional carbon nanotube and two dimensional graphene nanosheets.^25–27 In polymer matrices, very small amounts of nano-additives have been used to improve the physical properties of the nanomaterials.²⁸ The property variations have been found dependent upon the nanoparticle contents²⁹ as well as dispersion in the polymers.³⁰ Furthermore, matrix-nanofiller interactions both physical (electrostatic, aromatic stacking, van der Waals, etc.) or covalent affect the physical properties of the polymeric matrices.^31–33 Variety of polymers have been filled with carbon nanoparticles to attain fine morphology and physical features.^34–36 In addition to experimental studies, modeling or theoretical methods have been used to examine the matrix-nanofiller interactions in polymer/fullerene and dispersion properties of the nanocomposites.^37,38 Consequently, superior electron transference, thermal stability, strength, thermal conductivity, and functional properties have been investigated for nanocarbon nanocomposites.^39,40 Usually, carbon nanofillers have been identified to pointedly amend the thermal, mechanical, electrical, and other features of polymeric matrices, at low loading levels. By systematically fluctuating the nanofiller contents, functionality, dispersion, and orientation, physical properties of the nanocomposites have been altered. Actually, the physical features responsible for dispersion and morphology dependent ordering of polymer chains at matric-nanofiller-interface, thereby providing controlling and enhancing the electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of nanocomposites.^41–43 Especially, the surface modified fullerene has been found to affect the electrical and mechanical properties of polyurethanes nanocomposites.⁴⁴ Including fullerene has led to twofold upsurge in tensile strength (24-42 MPa) and Young’s modulus (33-65 MPa) of the nanocomposites. In this context, silane modified fullerene based nanocomposites have been designed to develop physical interactions with polyurethanes. These nanocomposites have finely dispersed fullerene nanoparticles. Consequently, the electrical conductivity of the nanomaterials was also enhanced. Hence, surface treatments like oxidation and silanization have been found to increase the uniform dispersion towards superior mechanical and conductivity features.

Polyamide Matrices with Fullerene Reinforcement

Polyamide is a class of thermoplastic polymer made up of amide monomers.^45,46 Polyamide may exist naturally or can be synthesized. Important properties of polyamides like microstructural, crystallinity, mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties rely on the hydrogen bonding and interactions among the amide groups of the polyamide chains.^47–49 Properties of polyamides have been enhanced using various nanocarbon (graphene, carbon nanotube) and inorganic (nanoclays) nanofillers.⁵⁰ Among nanocarbon nanofillers, fullerene molecules have been found important nanofiller for polyamide matrices such as polyamide 6, polyamide 66, and polyamide 12 to attain enhanced physical features.^51,52 Consequently, polyamide and fullerene derived nanocomposites have been designed and studied for matrix-nanoparticle interactions and physical properties.^53–55 Faykov and co-workers⁵⁶ investigated the nanocomposites of a polyamide, poly (m-phenylene isophthalamide), with heteroarm star fullerene C₆₀ core macromolecule to form nanocomposite and ionic liquid. The resulting nanomaterials were studied for morphology and gas separation studies for He/N₂, CO₂/N_2, and O₂/N₂ gases. Figure 1 shows the scanning electron microscopy images of pristine polyamide, poly (m-phenylene isophthalamide)/heteroarm star fullerene C₆₀ nanocomposite, and poly (m-phenylene isophthalamide)/heteroarm star fullerene C₆₀ ionic liquid through solvent casting method. The unfilled polyamide had typical uniform polyamide morphology. On the other hand, the polyamide matrix filled with fullerene revealed spherical domains. In the ionic liquid form, the spherical domains of the fullerene molecules were more homogeneously distributed throughout the matrix with sizes of 0.3-2 µm. Such distinct sphere-shaped structures were suggested to be developed due to polar armed heteroarm fullerene nanostructures in the matrix.

Figure 1.

Scanning electron microscopy images of cross-sections for (a) PA; (b) PA/HSM; and (c)&(d) PA/(HSM:IL) membranes.⁵⁶ PA = polyamide; HSM = heteroarm star macromolecular fullerene C₆₀; PA/HMS:IL = heteroarm star macromolecular fullerene C₆₀ ionic liquid. Reproduced with permission from MDPI.

Table 1 depicts the mechanical profiles of polyamide, nanocomposite, and ionic liquid studied at 20^◦C. It has been observed that the inclusion of fullerene molecules considerably enhanced the tensile/yield strength and elastic modulus of nanocomposites up to 49–55 MPa, compared with the neat polyamide and pristine ionic liquid. The results can be attributed to better non-covalent interactions between the matrix-nanofiller and load transfer properties. The nanoparticle addition reduced the elongation of break of the nanocomposite due to enhanced structural rigidity. Figure 2 illustrates the selectivity behavior of the neat polyamide, nanocomposite, and ionic liquid towards the separation of He/N₂, CO₂/N₂, and O₂/N₂ gas pairs. Adding 5 wt% of heteroarm fullerene molecule led to superior selectivity properties for ionic liquid, compared with the lower nanofiller contents. It seemed that the nanoparticle dispersion in the ionic liquid resulted in optimum free volume for the selective gas transport.

Table 1.

Mechanical properties of polyamide, nanocomposite, and ionic liquid (20^◦C).⁵⁶ PA = polyamide; HSM = heteroarm star macromolecular fullerene C₆₀; PA/HMS:IL = heteroarm star macromolecular fullerene C₆₀ ionic liquid. Reproduced with permission from MDPI.

Sample	Tensile strength, MPa	Yield strength, MPa	Elastic modulus, MPa	Elongation at break, %
PA	44	46	1700	70
PA/HSM	49	55	1850	50
PA/HSM:IL	45	53	1800	55

Figure 2.

Dependence of ideal selectivity in separation of He/N₂, CO₂/N₂, and O₂/N₂ gas pairs on nitrogen permeability using PA (3), PA/HSM (2), and PA/(HMS:IL) (1) ionic liquid membranes.⁵⁶ PA = polyamide; HSM = heteroarm star macromolecular fullerene C₆₀; PA/HMS:IL = heteroarm star macromolecular fullerene C₆₀ ionic liquid. Reproduced with permission from MDPI.

Zuev et al.⁵⁷ filled the polyamide 12 matrix with 0.02–0.08 wt% fullerene С₆₀ contents to form the nanocomposites. Young’s modulus of the nanomaterial was found higher at 0.04 % loading owing to fine physical matrix-nanofiller interactions. However, at higher loading level, the mechanical properties were found to decrease due to nanoparticle aggregation effects. Fullerene reinforced polyamide systems are displayed in Table 2. Literature reports high Young’s modulus values for the non-covalently linked polyamide/fullerene nanocomposites. Such strengthened physically linked polyamide/fullerene nanocomposites revealed applications in the fields of engineering, membranes, electronics, and energy.^58–60

Table 2.

Mechanical properties of few reported polyamide/fullerene nanocomposites.

Polyamide	Fullerene content (wt.%)	Modulus	Ref
Polyamide 6	0.1	–	[51]
Polyamide 6	0.1	8.3 GPa	[52]
Polyamide 66	2.0	1.0 GPa	[61]
Polyamide 12	10	58 GPa	[62]
Polyamide 12	0.04	2.9 Gpa	[63]

Polyurethane Nanocomposite with Fullerene Nanofiller

Polyurethane belongs to important category of thermoplastic polymers.^64–66 Polyurethane main chain is made up of recurring urethane monomers. These are simply the condensation polymers formed by reacting together the isocyanate (R-(N = C = O)_n and hydroxyl (R-(OH)_n groups.⁶⁷ Polyurethanes have been processed by the in situ approaches and solvent routes.^68–70 Among polyurethanes, segmented polymers have been formed through the reaction of a polyurethane prepolymer with the polyols or polyamines compounds.⁷¹ Polyurethanes, especially segmented polyurethanes, have fine heat, mechanical, and chemical stability properties. The urethane functionalities in polyurethane have tendency to develop hydrogen bonding between the chains and also the nanofiller particles.^72,73 Due to segmented structure having hard and soft units in the backbone, polyurethanes have superior structural and stability properties.⁷⁴ However, due to random chain growth of these polymeric chains, crosslinking effects have been observed.⁷⁵ Nanofillers like nanocarbon nanoparticles have been filled in the polyurethane matrix to improve the matrix characteristics.^76–78 Fullerene C₆₀ and functional fullerene molecules have also been filled in the polyurethane matrix to form the advanced nanocomposites.⁷⁹ Kausar⁸⁰ designed polyurethane using poly (ethylene adipate) tolylene 2,4-diisocyanate and polycaprolactone diol. The acid treated fullerene nanoparticles were studied for the formation of hydrogen bonding link with the segmented polymer. Inclusion of nanoparticles through physical route affected the physical features of the nanomaterials. The resulting polyurethane/fullerene nanocomposites revealed enhancements in the tensile strength and tensile modulus from 86.9 to 90.3 MPa and 33.3–47.6 GPa, respectively with the nanofiller addition. In addition, the non-covalent linking also enhanced the thermal stability profiles of the nanomaterials and maximum decomposition temperature and char yield were observed at 521°C and 45%, respectively. In another attempt, Kausar⁸¹ formed a system based on the polyurethane/poly (2-chloro-5-methoxyaniline)/fullerene С₆₀ nanocomposite using solution method. The nanocomposite revealed maximum temperature in the range of 501–633°C. The electrical conductivity enhancement was observed in the range of 10⁻² to 1.3 Scm⁻¹ due to interactions between the matrix and nanofiller. Shen et al.⁸² reported on the thermoplastic polyurethane and fullerene С₆₀ based system. Fullerene nanoparticles formed electrostatic attractions and π-π stacking interactions with isocyanate groups of polyurethane soft segments. The strong decoupling effects in translational-rotational diffusion and low ratio of translational-rotational diffusion coefficient (D_T/D_R) were observed with C₆₀ addition. The technical applications of polyurethane and composite materials have been investigated for aerospace, automobiles, electronics, construction, packaging, and other important fields.^83–85

Thermoplastic Copolymers and Block Copolymers Reinforced with Fullerene

Poly (methyl methacrylate) belongs to the category of commodity thermoplastic polymers due to facile processing and wide ranging application scope.^86–88 This interesting polymer is comprised of repeating methyl methacrylate monomer in the main chain.⁸⁹ Owing to colorless and transparent texture, it has been used as an alternative to glass in to attain light weight and durability properties.⁹⁰ Generally, poly (methyl methacrylate) own high heat resistance, scratch resilience, and weather or corrosion consistency.^91,92 Due to indispensable features, poly (methyl methacrylate) had applications in coatings, optical fibers, and biomedical fields.^93–95 To further improve the features and applications of poly (methyl methacrylate), nanocarbon nanoparticles have been added to form the nanocomposites.^96–98 Subsequently, fullerene has been identified as an important nanofiller for poly (methyl methacrylate) matrices.⁹⁹ Qi and co-workers¹⁰⁰ prepared the syndiotactic poly (methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites filled with fullerene C₆₀. Fullerene was used in the form of small one-dimensional nano-wires having interlinking molecules. The syndiotactic poly (methyl methacrylate) chains may yield helical structures encapsulating small fullerene chains. These structures are often referred as peapods of fullerene. This encapsulation effect was observed due to the electrostatic interactions of fullerene molecules with the helical polymer chains (Figure 3). Like fullerene C₆₀, C₇₀, and C₈₄ molecules have also be encapsulated in the helical polymer cavity.¹⁰¹ Figure 4 exhibits average energy changes before/after coulomb explosion versus average charge on fullerene molecules. The changes in the fullerene molecule orientations in small chains have been observed due to coulomb explosions. Izadi et al.¹⁰² reported on poly (methyl methacrylate)/fullerene nanocomposites through molecular dynamic simulation method. Inclusion of 4 wt% fullerene contents enhanced the Young’s modulus to 3.77 GPa, that is, 24% higher than the unfilled polymer. Moreover, Glass transition temperature was observed around 358-364 K. The representative volume elements or RVE was found as 500K. Nasr et al.¹⁰³ prepared the poly (methyl methacrylate)/fullerene nanocomposites. They studied the dielectric and electrical properties of the matrix with varying fullerene loadings. The dielectric and electrical properties were reported in frequency range 1 kHz to 5 MHz. The electrical modulus was increased considerably in the range of 743–1,386,755 kHz. The increase in properties were due increasing fullerene contents and secondary interactions in matrix-nanofiller.

Figure 3.

Illustration of syndiotactic poly (methyl methacrylate) (st-PMMA) and C₆₀ based helical nanostructure.¹⁰⁰ Reproduced with permission from Wiley.

Figure 4.

The average energy changes (DE) per C₆₀ molecule as a function of average charge loaded on each C₆₀ molecule in the 10-C₆₀ molecular wire before and after Coulomb explosion at 27 e^_, here only single-point energy calculation was done here.¹⁰⁰ Reproduced with permission from Wiley.

Among block copolymers, poly (n-alkyl methacrylate)s have side alkyl chains and are categorized as semicrystalline thermoplastic polymers.¹⁰⁴ Katiyar and co-workers¹⁰⁵ reported on the fullerene C₆₀ filled poly (n-alkyl methacrylate)s nanocomposites prepared using in situ method. Figure 5 demonstrates the synthesis of poly (alkyl methacrylate)s/fullerene nanomaterial through the electrostatic interactions. Inclusion of nanoparticles improved the thermal profiles of the nanocomposites, compared with the unfilled matrix. Figure 6 shows the differential scanning calorimetry scans of these nanocomposites. Unfilled neat polymer had glass transition temperature of 75°C. Loadings of 0.015 wt% fullerene molecules raised the glass transition values to 82°C. The results revealed restricted polymer chain movements due to the presence of rigid fullerene molecules. However, neat polymer had loosely bound chains resulting in lower glass transition values.

Figure 5.

Schematic representation of synthesis of fullerene containing poly (n-alkyl methacrylate)s.¹⁰⁵ Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.

Figure 6.

DSC thermograms of FBMA polymer samples.¹⁰⁵ DSC = differential scanning calorimetry; FBMA = poly (n-butyl methacrylate) polymers. I = 30 mg/L; II = = 100 mg/L; III = 150 mg/L. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.

Teh et al. ¹⁰⁶ used in situ technique for the formation of polyacrylonitrile/fullerene nanocomposites. The design of non-covalent interactions through aromatic stacking in the polyacrylonitrile-fullerene was studied. Figure 7 depicts an electron donor-acceptor linking model. The π-π non-covalent interactions in the donor-acceptor polymer/fullerene nanostructure is given in Figure 8. Figure 9 reveals a density functional theory and Gaussian basis set derived potential energy curve of the polyacrylonitrile/fullerene nanocomposite versus distance between fullerene center and acrylonitrile monomer. The change in potential energy profile was observed due to the non-covalent interactions between the aromatic groups of C₆₀ and the monomer.

Figure 7.

Non-covalent electron donor-acceptor interactions of fullerene: (a) binding of acrylonitrile with fullerene; and (b) Binding of styrene acrylonitrile monomer with fullerene.¹⁰⁶ Reproduced with permission from ACS.

Figure 8.

Illustration of the formation of an electron donor-acceptor interactions.¹⁰⁶ Reproduced with permission from ACS.

Figure 9.

Potential energy curve of acrylonitrile/fullerene (AN-C60) with the C-C bond of AN aligned to the center of the hexagon on C60.¹⁰⁶ Reproduced with permission from ACS.

Figure 10 predicts the physical linkings probabilities of the poly (cyanostyrene-ran-styrene), poly (styrene-ranacrylonitrile), and poly (dimethyl amino ethyl methacrylate-ran-methyl methacrylate) matrices towards the fullerene molecules.¹⁰⁶ The electron donor or withdrawing behavior of block copolymers were dependent upon the nature of main chain functionality. Pereira and co-workers¹⁰⁷ reported on the non-covalently reinforced fullerene C₆₀ and C₆₁-butyric acid methyl ester additives in the poly (methyl methacrylate) matrix. Fullerene nanoparticles were loaded up to 3 wt%. Inclusion of 1 wt% nanoparticles enhanced the thermal properties, compared with the neat matrix and 3 wt% nanofiller addition (Table 3). The thermo-oxidative stability of the nanomaterials was decreased at higher nanofiller addition due to nanoparticle aggregation effects.

Figure 10.

Structures of the copolymers used in this study.¹⁰⁶ (a) poly (styrene-ranacrylonitrile); (b) poly (cyanostyrene-ran-styrene); and (c) poly (dimethyl amino ethyl methacrylate-ran-methyl methacrylate). Reproduced with permission from ACS.

Table 3.

Thermo-oxidative stability of poly (methyl methacrylate) and poly (methyl methacrylate)/C₆₀ nanocomposite in air.¹⁰⁷ Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.

PMMA (wt.%)	C₆₀ (wt.%)	T_2%	T_max
100	0	280	348
99	1	303	381
97	3	302	375
C₆₁-butyric acid methyl ester	1	324	383

Kausar et al.¹⁰⁸ formed the solution blends of poly (vinyl butyral-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl acetate)/polystyrene and filled with fullerene and graphene oxide based nanofiller. The resulting nanocomposites increased the tensile strength from 22.1 to 28.3 MPa with increasing loading level of 0.1–5 wt%. Furthermore, fullerene based nanoparticle addition caused positive effects on the electrical conductivity of the nanomaterials to enhance in the range of 1.8–2.5 Scm⁻¹, showing the reinforcement effects, formation of matrix-nanofiller interactions, and percolation effects.

Viewpoints

The polymer/fullerene nanocomposites form an important class of polymer/nanocarbon nanomaterials. Properties of these materials have been found dependent upon the fullerene incorporation method in the matrices, interactions between the polymer-fullerene, and the amount of fullerene molecules added to the polymers.^109,110 Although, the fullerene nanocomposites have been developed with the different types of polymers belonging from the categories of thermoplastics, thermosets, rubbers, and conductive matrices, but most of research has focused the development of thermoplastic polymer/fullerene nanomaterials. The reason is the immense research focus on developing the nanocomposites of thermoplastic polymers due to their facile processing and specific properties. In the polymer/nanocarbon nanocomposites, type of nanofiller reinforcement (covalent or non-covalent) is always important to define the nanocomposite properties and end uses. In the case of thermoplastic polymer/fullerene, non-covalent reinforcement has been mostly studied and found effective to form the technologically viable materials. The thermoplastic polymers such as polyamides, polyurethanes, poly (methyl methacrylate), and related block copolymers have been studied with the fullerene nanofiller prepared through physical reinforcement method. Majority of research observed on the polymer/fullerene nanocomposites employed the thermoplastic matrices with non-covalent fullerene addition. Table 4 outline few fullerene reinforced thermoplastic systems depicting the thermal, mechanical, electrical, and physical features of the nanocomposites. It is important to mention these properties for the non-covalently or physically linked thermoplastic polymers/fullerene nanomaterials.¹¹¹ Enhancements in the electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of the nanocomposites depends upon numerous factors including the fullerene contents, nanofiller dispersion and nanoparticle orientation,¹¹² nanofiller percolation network formation in matrix, matrix-nanofiller interface formation,¹¹³ polymer type and molecular weight, fabrication method used and parameters.¹¹⁴ Despite of the fact that the interactions in these nanomaterials are not covalent, fine nanofiller dispersion and reinforcement effects on the physical properties were attained.¹¹⁵

Table 4.

Thermal, mechanical, electrical, physical properties of thermoplastic polymer/fullerene nanocomposites.

Polymer matrix	Nanofiller	Fabrication technique	Features	Ref.
Poly (m-phenylene isophthalamide)	Heteroarm star fullerene C₆₀ core macromolecule	Solution method	Homogeneous dispersion; particle size 0.3-2 µm; tensile/yield strength and elastic modulus nanocomposites 49-55 MPa; T_g 253 °C–260°C; Gas separation	[56]
Polyamide 12	Fullerene С₆₀	Mechanical mixing	Young’s modulus 0.85-1.04 GPa; tensile strength 67-72 MPa; Increase in mechanical properties by 20% T_g 325-329 K; dielectric properties	[57]
Polyurethane	Fullerene С₆₀	Solution method	Photocatalytic effect	[79]
Polyurethane from poly (ethylene adipate) tolylene 2,4-diisocyanate and polycaprolactone diol	Fullerene С₆₀	Solution method	Tensile strength 86.9-90.3 MPa; tensile modulus 33.3-47.6 GPa; T_max 521°C; char yield 45%	[80]
Polyurethane/poly (2-chloro-5-methoxyaniline)	Fullerene С₆₀	Solution method	T_max 501-633°C; electrical conductivity 10⁻² to 1.3 Scm⁻¹	[81]
Thermoplastic polyurethane	Fullerene С₆₀	Molecular dynamics simulations	Strong decoupling translational-rotational diffusion; low ratio translational-rotational diffusion coefficient (D_T/D_R) with C₆₀ addition	[82]
Syndiotactic poly (methyl methacrylate)	Fullerene C₆₀	In situ polymerization	T_g 131 °C–136°C; dynamic fragilities 75-102; Average energy changes	[100]
Poly (methyl methacrylate)	Fullerene C₆₀	Molecular dynamic simulation	Young’s modulus 3.77 GPa; Glass transition temperature 358-364 K; representative volume elements, RVE 500K	[102]
Poly (methyl methacrylate)	Fullerene C₆₀	Solution casting	Dielectric properties; Electrical modulus 743-1,386,755 kHz	[103]
Polyacrylonitrile	Fullerene C₆₀	In situ polymerization	Change in T_g with fullerene contents	[106]
Poly (methyl methacrylate)	Fullerene C₆₀ ^6,6; -phenyl-C₆₁-butyric acid methyl ester	Melt processing	Thermo-oxidative stability; T₂ 303 °C–324°C T_max 348 °C–341°C	[107]
Polystyrene	Fullerene C₆₀ ^6,6; -phenyl-C₆₁-butyric acid methyl ester	Melt processing	Thermo-oxidative stability; T₅ 347 °C–367°C T_max 414 °C–417°C	[107]
Poly (vinyl butyral-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl acetate)/polystyrene blend	Fullerene/graphene oxide	Solution method	Tensile strength 22.1-28.3 MPa; electrical conductivity 1.8-2.5 Scm⁻¹	[108]

Controlled grafting of chains on the fullerene surface has been found to enhance the heat stability of the thermoplastic polymer/fullerene nanomaterials. As compared to physically interacted polystyrene/fullerene nanocomposite with maximum degradation temperature in the rage of 400 °C–420 °C,¹⁰⁷ the reported system on covalently grafted polystyrene/fullerene revealed higher maximum degradation temperature of about 550°C.^116–118 Similarly, compared with the physically interacted polyurethane/fullerene or polyamide/fullerene nanocomposites,^56,57,80,81 enhanced degradation temperature of 598°C, strength of 98 MPa, and Young’s modulus of 58 GPa have been observed for a reported covalently linked system.⁶² Similarly, covalently interacted polymer/fullerene nanocomposites have been found effective for electrical conductivity enhancement of these system.¹¹⁹ Despite of these facts, the physically interacted polymer/fullerene nanocomposites have been frequently developed and studied for potential applications.

Literature reports on the potential of these nanomaterials in wide ranging fields of energy (supercapacitors, solar cells, fuel cell, etc.), electronics (batteries, sensors, microelectronics), membranes, packages, textiles, space/automotives, and biomedical fields.^120,121 To avoid the aggregation problems of the non-covalent filled nanocomposites, functional fullerene nanoparticles have been used.^122–124 Consequently, the physical interactions govern the interfacial aspects, dispersion, and resulting features of the polymer-fullerene nanomaterials.^125–127

Conclusions

This front-line review is undoubtedly a crucial effort focusing the polymer/fullerene nanocomposites having non-covalently linked nanostructure. Particularly, most of the polymer/fullerene nanocomposite research has been detected regarding the physically reinforced fullerene thermoplastics matrices, which are covered in this article. Accordingly, the non-covalently linked polymer/fullerene nanocomposites revealed exclusive microstructural and physical property profiles leading to the high performance nanocomposites. Briefly, this cutting-edge article summarizes critical characteristics of the fullerene reinforced thermoplastic matrix nanocomposites. In this concern, most widely used thermoplasts include polyamide, polyurethane, polystyrene, poly (methyl methacrylate), and block copolymers. Facile techniques have been used to incorporate the fullerene molecules in the matrices. The resulting properties of the nanomaterials depend upon the type of polymer used, nanofiller form, nanofiller dispersion, matrix-nanofiller interactions, synthesis technique, and other aspects. Synergistic effects between the matrix and nanoparticles have been found essential for better scattering and percolation properties of the nanomaterials. Consequently, electrical conductivity of such systems may be significantly high even >2 Scm⁻¹. The glass transition temperature and degradation temperatures have also been detected high >200°C and >600°C, respectively. Non-covalent reinforcement of fullerene nanoparticles in thermoplastic matrices have also resulted in high tensile strength and young’s modulus values close to 100 MPa and >50 GPa, respectively. Subsequently, the high-tech physically linked thermoplastic polymer/fullerene nanocomposites have found important advantages for vital industrial sectors like aerospace, automotive, energy storage and production, and electronics devices.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Ayesha Kausar

References

Üçpinar Durmaz

Aytac

. The synergistic effects of micro-and nano-fillers on the properties of polyamide 11/poly (lactic acid) blend. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2023: 08927057231205453.

Kausar

. Current state-of-the-art of carbonaceous nanofiller coated carbon fiber in polymeric nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2022: 08927057221139590.

Wypych

. Functional fillers: chemical composition, morphology, performance, applications. Elsevier, 2023.

Morimune-Moriya

. Polymer/nanocarbon nanocomposites with enhanced properties. Polym J 2022; 54(8): 977–984.

Kausar

. State-of-the-art of polyimide films reinforced with fullerene-design, features and applications. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2023: 08927057231173596.

Zuev

. Polymer nanocomposites containing fullerene C60 nanofillers. In: Macromolecular Symposia. Wiley Online Library, 2011.

Penkova

Acquah

Piotrovskiy

, et al. Fullerene derivatives as nano-additives in polymer composites. Russ Chem Rev 2017; 86(6): 530–566.

Kausar

. Polymer/fullerene nanocomposites: design and applications. Elsevier, 2023.

Gopal

Muthu

Sivanesan

. A A Comprehensive Compilation of Graphene/Fullerene Polymer Nanocomposites for Electrochemical Energy Storageomprehensive compilation of graphene/fullerene polymer nanocomposites for electrochemical energy storage. Polymers 2023; 15(3): 701.

10.

Kausar

. Polymeric nanocomposite with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane and nanocarbon (fullerene, graphene, carbon nanotube, nanodiamond)—Polymeric nanocomposite with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane and nanocarbon (fullerene, graphene, carbon nanotube, nanodiamond)—futuristic headwaysuturistic headways. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials 2023; 62(7): 921–934.

11.

Wössner

Wassy

Weber

, et al. [n] [n]Cyclodibenzopentalenes as Antiaromatic Curved Nanocarbons with High Strain and Strong Fullerene Bindingyclodibenzopentalenes as antiaromatic curved nanocarbons with high strain and strong fullerene binding. J Am Chem Soc 2021; 143(31): 12244–12252.

12.

Gergeroglu

Yildirim

Ebeoglugil

. Nano-carbons in biosensor applications: an overview of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and fullerenes (C60). SN Appl Sci 2020; 2(4): 1–22.

13.

Buseck

Tsipursky

Hettich

, et al. Fullerenes from the geological environment. Science 1992; 257(5067): 215–217.

14.

Ito

Nishioka

Akita

, et al. An aromatic micelle with bent pentacene-based panels: encapsulation of perylene bisimide dyes and graphene nanosheets. Chem Sci 2020; 11(26): 6752–6757.

15.

Xie

, et al. Frequency tuning of two-dimensional nanoelectromechanical resonators via comb-drive mems actuators. in 2019 20th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems & Eurosensors XXXIII ( TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXXIII ). 2019. IEEE.

16.

Kim

Lee

Seo

, et al. Near-complete blocking of multivalent anions in graphene oxide membranes with tunable interlayer spacing from 3.7 to 8.0 angstrom. J Memb Sci 2019: 592, 117394.

17.

Sarathy

Westbrook

Mehl

, et al. Comprehensive chemical kinetic modeling of the oxidation of 2-methylalkanes from C7 to C20. Combust Flame 2011; 158(12): 2338–2357.

18.

Guo

Diener

Chai

, et al. Uranium stabilization of C28: a tetravalent fullerene. Science 1992; 257(5077): 1661–1664.

19.

Jaiswal

Tiwari

Bahadur

. Inter-stellar space discovery, spectroscopic structure identification and application of C60 buckminsterfullerene. Int J Eng Res Gen Sci 2021; 9: 12–19.

20.

David

Míguez-Lago

Cruz

, et al. Heptagon-heptagon-containing saddle-shaped nanographenes: self-association and complexation studies with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fullerenesontaining saddle-shaped nanographenes: self-association and complexation studies with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fullerenes. Organic Materials 2021; 03(01): 051–059.

21.

Berné

Tielens

. Formation of buckminsterfullerene (C60) in interstellar space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109(2): 401–406.

22.

Ariga

Shrestha

. Zero-to-one (or more) nanoarchitectonics: Zero-to-one (or more) nanoarchitectonics: how to produce functional materials from zero-dimensional single-element unit, fullereneow to produce functional materials from zero-dimensional single-element unit, fullerene. Mater Adv 2021; 2(2): 582–597.

23.

Chen

Shrestha

Ariga

. Zero-to-two nanoarchitectonics: Zero-to-Two Nanoarchitectonics: Fabrication of Two-Dimensional Materials from Zero-Dimensional Fullereneabrication of two-dimensional materials from zero-dimensional fullerene. Molecules 2021; 26(15): 4636.

24.

Yang

, et al. Zero-Zero-Dimensional Carbon Nanomaterials for Fluorescent Sensing and Imagingimensional carbon nanomaterials for fluorescent sensing and imaging. Chem Rev 2023; 123(18): 11047–11136.

25.

Nie

Zhou

, et al. Controllability of polymer crystal orientation using heterogeneous nucleation of deformed polymer loops grafted on two-dimensional nanofiller. J Phys Chem B 2017; 121(27): 6685–6690.

26.

Abbasian

Omidvar-Askary

. The optimization of dispersant content in alumina castable containing nano-titania. Advanced Ceramics Progress 2018; 4: 16–22.

27.

Mane

SKB

Shaishta

Manjunatha

. One-dimensional polymeric nanocomposites: an introduction. In: One-Dimensional Polymeric Nanocomposites: Synthesis to Emerging Applications. CRC Press, 2023, pp. 1–20.

28.

Khodadadi

Golestanian

Aghadavoudi

. Two modified multiscale modeling approaches for determination of two-phase and hybrid nanocomposite properties. Proc IME C J Mech Eng Sci 2022; 236(1): 496–510.

29.

Lin

Liang

, et al. Graphene oxide as a promising nanofiller for polymer composite. Surf Interfaces 2023: 37, 102747.

30.

Chandrashekar

Hegde

Krishna

, et al. Non-covalent surface functionalization of nanofillers towards the enhancement of thermal conductivity of polymer nanocomposites: Non-covalent surface functionalization of nanofillers towards the enhancement of thermal conductivity of polymer nanocomposites: A mini review mini review. Eur Polym J 2023: 198, 112379.

31.

Zheng

Wang

Zhu

, et al. Recent advances in the construction and properties of carbon-based nanofillers/polymer composites with segregated network structures. Mater Today Commun 2023: 36, 106773.

32.

Maurya

Sinha

Kumar

, et al. A review: A review: Impact of surface treatment of nanofillers for improvement in thermo mechanical properties of the epoxy based nanocompositesmpact of surface treatment of nanofillers for improvement in thermo mechanical properties of the epoxy based nanocomposites. Mater Today Proc 2023; 78: 164–172.

33.

Goodwin

, et al. Microscopy approaches to assess surface morphological changes of graphene oxide/waterborne polyurethane coatings exposed to UV radiation, 2019.

34.

Šupová

Martynková

Barabaszová

. Effect of nanofillers dispersion in polymer matrices: a review. Sci Adv Mater 2011; 3(1): 1–25.

35.

Thomas

Mishra

Asiri

. Sustainable polymer composites and nanocomposites. Springer, 2019.

36.

Akharame

, et al. Nanostructured polymer composites for water remediation. In: Nanostructured Materials for Treating Aquatic Pollution. Springer, 2019, pp. 275–306.

37.

Zare

. Modeling approach for tensile strength of interphase layers in polymer nanocomposites. J Colloid Interface Sci 2016; 471: 89–93.

38.

Philippe

Schaumann

. Interactions of dissolved organic matter with natural and engineered inorganic colloids: a review. Environ Sci Technol 2014; 48(16): 8946–8962.

39.

Shaikh

Kubade

. Effect of nanofillers on rolled polymer nanocomposites: a review. Mater Today Proc 2023.

40.

Janudin

, et al. Synthetic nanofillers: preparation and properties. In: Synthetic and Natural Nanofillers in Polymer Composites. Elsevier, 2023, pp. 3–27.

41.

Vaithylingam

Ansari

Shanks

. Recent advances in polyurethane-based nanocomposites: a review. Polym Plast Technol Eng 2017; 56(14): 1528–1541.

42.

Wang

Ruan

, et al. Recent advances in high-strength and high-toughness polyurethanes based on supramolecular interactions. Polym Chem 2022; 13(17): 2420–2441.

43.

Elessawy

El-Sayed

Ali

, et al. One-pot green synthesis of magnetic fullerene nanocomposite for adsorption characteristics. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2020; 34: 101047.

44.

Tayfun

Kanbur

Abaci

, et al. Mechanical, flow and electrical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane/fullerene composites: Mechanical, flow and electrical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane/fullerene composites: Effect of surface modification of fullereneffect of surface modification of fullerene. Compos B Eng 2015; 80: 101–107.

45.

Min-Wang

, et al. Polyamide layer modulation for PA-TFC membranes optimization: developments, mechanisms, and implications. Separation and Purification Technology 2023: 311, 123200.

46.

Xie

Chen

, et al. Fabrication of novel thin-film nanocomposite polyamide membrane by the interlayer approach: Fabrication of novel thin-film nanocomposite polyamide membrane by the interlayer approach: A review review. Desalination 2023; 554: 116509.

47.

Liu

Peng

Lin

, et al. The The Crystallization Behavior Regulating Nature of Hydrogen Bonds Interaction on Polyamide 6,6 by Poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)rystallization behavior regulating nature of hydrogen bonds interaction on polyamide 6, 6 by poly (vinyl pyrrolidone). Chin J Polym Sci 2023; 41(3): 394–404.

48.

Yan

Zhu

Liu

, et al. Improving interfacial adhesion and mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composites with environment-friendly water-based sizing agent. Compos B Eng 2023; 258: 110675.

49.

Liu

Wang

Yang

, et al. New insights into adsorption mechanism of pristine and weathered polyamide microplastics towards hydrophilic organic compounds. Environ Pollut 2023; 317: 120818.

50.

Sharma

Kumar

Jain

, et al. Bio-based polyamide nanocomposites of nanoclay, carbon nanotubes and graphene: a review. Iran Polym J (Engl Ed) 2023; 32(6): 773–790.

51.

Dencheva

Gaspar

Filonovich

, et al. Fullerene-modified polyamide 6 by in situ anionic polymerization in the presence of PCBM. J Mater Sci 2014; 49(14): 4751–4764.

52.

Zuev

Ivanova

. Mechanical and electrical properties of polyamide-6-based nanocomposites reinforced by fulleroid fillers. Polym Eng Sci 2012; 52(6): 1206–1211.

53.

Sudareva

Saprykina

Yudin

VEN

, et al. Comparison of bonds existing between C60 fullerene and polyamide molecules in various nanocomposite materials. Fullerenes, Nanotub Carbon Nanostruct 2015; 23(9): 807–817.

54.

Sudareva

Penkova

Kostereva

, et al. Properties of casting solutions and ultrafiltration membranes based on fullerene-polyamide nanocomposites. Express Polym Lett 2012; 6, 178, 188(3).

55.

Beranová

Klouda

Vávra

. C60 Fullerene Derivative: preparation of a water-soluble fullerene derivative in reaction with peracetic acid. in Conference proceedings Nanocon 2009. 2009.

56.

Faykov

Polotskaya

Kuryndin

, et al. The The Effect of Complex Modifier Consisting of Star Macromolecules and Ionic Liquid on Structure and Gas Separation of Polyamide Membraneffect of complex modifier consisting of star macromolecules and ionic liquid on structure and gas separation of polyamide membrane. Membranes 2023; 13(5): 516.

57.

Zuev

Shlikov

. Polyamide 12/fullerene C60 composites: investigation on their mechanical and dielectric properties. J Polym Res 2012; 19(8): 1–6.

58.

Zhao

Chen

Zhu

, et al. Synthesis and photophysical properties of polyamides containing in-chain porphyrin and [60] fullerene. J Nanopart Res 2012; 14(3): 765.

59.

Nayana

, et al. Future of nanotechnology and functionalized nanomaterials. In: Functionalized Nanomaterials Based Supercapacitor: Design, Performance and Industrial Applications. Springer, 2023, pp. 655–677.

60.

Liu

Jiang

Wang

, et al. Recent advances in selenophene-based materials for organic solar cells. Materials 2022; 15(22): 7883.

61.

Keskin

Gocek

Ozkoc

. Mechanical and morphological properties of buckminster fullerene (C60) added glass fiber reinforced polyamide 66 multiscale composites. In: Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publ, 2015.

62.

Kausar

. Waterborne polyurethane-coated polyamide/fullerene composite films: Waterborne polyurethane-coated polyamide/fullerene composite films: Mechanical, thermal, and flammability propertiesechanical, thermal, and flammability properties. Int J Polym Anal Char 2016; 21(4): 275–285.

63.

Zuev

Shlikov

. Polyamide 12/fullerene C60 composites: investigation on their mechanical and dielectric properties. J Polym Res 2012; 19(8): 9925.

64.

Kemona

Piotrowska

. Polyurethane Polyurethane Recycling and Disposal: Methods and Prospectsecycling and disposal: methods and prospects. Polymers 2020; 12(8): 1752.

65.

Heiran

Ghaderian

Reghunadhan

, et al. Glycolysis: an efficient route for recycling of end of life polyurethane foams. J Polym Res 2021; 28(1): 22.

66.

Kaikade

Sabnis

. Polyurethane foams from vegetable oil-based polyols: a review. Polym Bull 2023; 80(3): 2239–2261.

67.

Hepburn

. Polyurethane elastomers. Springer Science and Business Media, 2012.

68.

Lin

Zheng

Zhang

Huang

Guo

Jin

. Synthesis and properties of epoxy-polyurethane/silica nanocomposites by a novel sol method and in-situ solution polymerization route. Appl Surf Sci 2014; 303: 67–75.

69.

Lei

Zhou

Fang

, et al. Eco-friendly waterborne polyurethane reinforced with cellulose nanocrystal from office waste paper by two different methods. Carbohydr Polym 2019; 209: 299–309.

70.

, et al. Fabrication and properties of antimicrobial flexible nanocomposite polyurethane foams with in situ generated copper nanoparticles. J Mater Res Technol 2022; 19: 3603–3615.

71.

Imre

Gojzewski

Check

, et al. Properties and Properties and Phase Structure of Polycaprolactone-Based Segmented Polyurethanes with Varying Hard and Soft Segments: Effects of Processing Conditionshase structure of polycaprolactone-based segmented polyurethanes with varying hard and soft segments: effects of processing conditions. Macromol Chem Phys 2018; 219(2): 1700214.

72.

Wang

Luo

Wang

, et al. Methanol degradation mechanisms and permeability phenomena in novolac epoxy and polyurethane coatings. J Coat Technol Res 2021: 18, 831–842.

73.

Guo

Zhang

, et al. Extremely Extremely Strong and Tough Biodegradable Poly(urethane) Elastomers with Unprecedented Crack Tolerance via Hierarchical Hydrogen-Bonding Interactionstrong and tough biodegradable poly (urethane) elastomers with unprecedented crack tolerance via hierarchical hydrogen-bonding interactions. Adv Mater 2023: 35; 2212130.

74.

Zeng

Chen

Sha

, et al. Highly stretchable fatty acid chain-dangled thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers enabled by H-bonds and molecular chain entanglements. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2022; 10(35): 11524–11532.

75.

Chen

Deng

Zhao

, et al. Novel piperazine-containing oligomer as flame retardant and crystallization induction additive for thermoplastics polyurethane. Chem Eng J 2020; 400: 125941.

76.

Zhang

Palumbo

Kim

, et al. Flexible Flexible Graphene-, Graphene-Oxide-, and Carbon-Nanotube-Based Supercapacitors and Batteriesraphene-, graphene-oxide-, and carbon-nanotube-based supercapacitors and batteries. Ann Phys 2019; 531(10): 1800507.

77.

Kausar

Ahmad

Zhao

, et al. Nanocomposite Nanocomposite Foams of Polyurethane with Carbon Nanoparticles—Design and Competence towards Shape Memory, Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Shielding, and Biomedical Fieldsoams of polyurethane with carbon nanoparticles—design and competence towards shape memory, electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding, and biomedical fields. Crystals 2023; 13(8): 1189.

78.

Kausar

Ahmad

Aldaghri

, et al. Shape Shape Memory Graphene Nanocomposites—Fundamentals, Properties, and Significanceemory graphene nanocomposites—fundamentals, properties, and significance. Processes 2023; 11(4): 1171.

79.

Lundin

Giles

Cozzens

, et al. Self-cleaning photocatalytic polyurethane coatings containing modified C60 fullerene additives. Coatings 2014; 4(3): 614–629.

80.

Kausar

. Estimation of thermo-mechanical and fire resistance profile of epoxy coated polyurethane/fullerene composite films. Fullerenes, Nanotub Carbon Nanostruct 2016; 24(6): 391–399.

81.

Kausar

. Polyurethane/Poly (2-chloro-5-methoxyaniline) and carbon nano-onion-based nanocomposite: physical properties and anti-corrosion behavior. Materials Research Innovations, 2018.

82.

Shen

, et al. Structural and dynamical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane/fullerene nanocomposites: a molecular dynamics simulations study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2023; 25(40): 27352–27363.

83.

Shikha

Jacob

. Pentaerythritol derived phosphorous based bicyclic compounds as promising flame retardants for thermoplastic polyurethane films. J Appl Polym Sci 2020: 50375.

84.

Zhang

Xiang

Zhu

, et al. Flexible and high-performance piezoresistive strain sensors based on carbon nanoparticles@ polyurethane sponges. Compos Sci Technol 2020; 200: 108437.

85.

Zhang

, et al. Lightweight, multifunctional microcellular PMMA/Fe3O4@ MWCNTs nanocomposite foams with efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos Appl Sci Manuf 2017; 100: 128–138.

86.

Anjum

Shaikh

Tiwari

. Experimental investigations of channel profile and surface roughness on PMMA substrate for microfluidic devices with mathematical modelling. Optik 2022: 261, 169154.

87.

Ghasemi

Jahani

Moradi

, et al. Different Modification Methods of Poly Methyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement for Orthopedic Surgery Applicationsodification methods of poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement for orthopedic surgery applications. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2023; 11(8): 485-492.

88.

Pawar

. A review article on acrylic PMMA. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng 2016; 13(2): 1–4.

89.

Poddar

Vishwakarma

Moholkar

. Rheological and mechanical properties of PMMA/organoclay nanocomposites prepared via ultrasound-assisted in-situ emulsion polymerization. Kor J Chem Eng 2019; 36(5): 828–836.

90.

Kubiak

Yan

Pietrasik

, et al. Toughening PMMA with fillers containing polymer brushes synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Polymer 2017; 117: 48–53.

91.

Okolieocha

Beckert

Herling

, et al. Preparation of microcellular low-density PMMA nanocomposite foams: Preparation of microcellular low-density PMMA nanocomposite foams: Influence of different fillers on the mechanical, rheological and cell morphological propertiesnfluence of different fillers on the mechanical, rheological and cell morphological properties. Compos Sci Technol 2015; 118: 108–116.

92.

Stefanov

, et al. Laser characterization of the depth profile of complex refractive index of PMMA implanted with 50 keV silicon ions. In: 17th International School on Quantum Electronics: Laser Physics and Applications. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2013.

93.

Ali

Karim

Buang

. A review of the properties and applications of poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Polym Rev 2015; 55(4): 678–705.

94.

Faghih

Sharp

. Solvent-based bonding of PMMA–PMMA for microfluidic applications. Microsyst Technol 2019; 25(9): 3547–3558.

95.

Moncayo-Matute

Vázquez-Silva

Peña-Tapia

, et al. Finite Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cranial Implant Manufactured with PMMA and PEEK: A Mechanical Comparative Studylement analysis of patient-specific 3D-printed cranial implant manufactured with PMMA and PEEK: a mechanical comparative study. Polymers 2023; 15(17): 3620.

96.

Czapura

Stando

Janas

. (Digital presentation) preparation and characterization of PMMA-SWCNT nanocomposites. In: Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts 243. The Electrochemical Society, Inc, 2023.

97.

Arıcı

Kaçmaz

Kamali

Ege

. Influence of graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes on physicochemical properties of bone cements. Mater Chem Phys 2023; 293: 126961.

98.

Angela

, et al. Surface modification of nanodiamonds. Nanodiamonds in Analytical and Biological Sciences: Principles and Applications 2023: 52–72.

99.

Wang

Guo

Zhu

. Polymers containing fullerene or carbon nanotube structures. Prog Polym Sci 2004; 29(11): 1079–1141.

100.

Iida

Liu

, et al. Electrical switching behavior of a [60] fullerene-based molecular wire encapsulated in a syndiotactic poly (methyl methacrylate) helical cavity. Angew Chem 2013; 125(3): 1083–1087.

101.

Cho

Jung

Ham

, et al. Charge storage variations of organic memory devices fabricated by using C60 molecules embedded in an insulating polymer layer with Au and Al electrodes. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2010; 10(7): 4797–4800.

102.

Izadi

Ghavanloo

Nayebi

. Elastic properties of polymer composites reinforced with C60 fullerene and carbon onion: Elastic properties of polymer composites reinforced with C60 fullerene and carbon onion: Molecular dynamics simulationolecular dynamics simulation. Phys B Condens Matter 2019; 574: 311636.

103.

Nasr

Ahmed

. AC conductivity and dielectric properties of PMMA/fullerene composites. Mod Phys Lett B 2010; 24(09): 911–919.

104.

Wang

, et al. Chain flexibility and glass transition temperatures of poly (n-alkyl (meth) acrylate) s: Chain flexibility and glass transition temperatures of poly(n-alkyl (meth)acrylate)s: Implications of tacticity and chain dynamicsmplications of tacticity and chain dynamics. Polymer 2021; 213: 123207.

105.

Katiyar

Bag

Nigam

. Thermal properties of fullerene (C60) containing poly (alkyl methacrylate) s. Thermochim Acta 2013; 557: 55–60.

106.

Teh

Linton

Sumpter

, et al. Controlling non-covalent interactions to modulate the dispersion of fullerenes in polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 2011; 44(19): 7737–7745.

107.

Pereira

Gaspar

Fernandes

, et al. Impact of fullerenes on the thermal stability of melt processed polystyrene and poly (methyl methacrylate) composites. Polym Test 2015; 47: 130–136.

108.

Kausar

. Formation and properties of poly (vinyl butyral-co-vinyl alcohol-co-vinyl acetate)/polystyrene composites reinforced with graphene oxide-nanodiamond. Am J Polym Sci 2014; 4: 54–62.

109.

Singhal

Pivin

Avasthi

. Ion beam irradiation-induced tuning of SPR of Au nanoparticles in fullerene C 70 matrix: dependence of energy loss. J Nanopart Res 2013; 15(5): 1641.

110.

Huang

Shen

Zhang

, et al. Efficient oxygen reduction catalysts of porous carbon nanostructures decorated with transition metal species. Adv Energy Mater 2020; 10(11): 1900375.

111.

Raimondo

Naddeo

Vertuccio

, et al. Multifunctionality of structural nanohybrids: Multifunctionality of structural nanohybrids: the crucial role of carbon nanotube covalent and non-covalent functionalization in enabling high thermal, mechanical and self-healing performancehe crucial role of carbon nanotube covalent and non-covalent functionalization in enabling high thermal, mechanical and self-healing performance. Nanotechnology 2020; 31(22): 225708.

112.

Osman

Elhakeem

Kaytbay

, et al. A comprehensive review on the thermal, electrical, and mechanical properties of graphene-based multi-functional epoxy composites. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022; 5(2): 547–605.

113.

Huang

Zeng

, et al. A review of the electrical and mechanical properties of carbon nanofiller-reinforced polymer composites. J Mater Sci 2019; 54: 1036–1076.

114.

Yousfi

Samuel

Soulestin

, et al. Rheological considerations in processing self-reinforced thermoplastic polymer nanocomposites: a review. Polymers 2022; 14(3): 637.

115.

Latif

Ali

Lee

, et al. Thermal and thermal and mechanical properties of Nano-Carbon-Reinforced polymeric nanocomposites: A reviewechanical properties of nano-carbon-reinforced polymeric nanocomposites: a review. J Compos Sci 2023; 7(10): 441.

116.

Brazhkin

Lyapin

Popova

Klyuev

Naletov

. Mechanical properties of the 3D polymerized, sp 2–sp 3 amorphous, and diamond-plus-graphite nanocomposite carbon phases prepared from C 60 under high pressure. J Appl Phys 1998; 84(1): 219–226.

117.

Harris

. Fullerene polymers: Fullerene Polymers: A Brief Review brief review. Chimia 2020; 6(4): 71.

118.

Laranjeira

Marques

Mezouar

, et al. Bonding frustration in the 9.5 GPa fcc polymeric C60. Physica Rapid Research Ltrshysica Status Solidi (RRL)–Rapid Research Letters 2017; 11(12): 1700343.

119.

Bronnikov

Podshivalov

Kostromin

, et al. Electrical conductivity of polyazomethine/fullerene C60 nanocomposites. Phys Lett 2017; 381(8): 796–800.

120.

Wang

Xie

, et al. Fabrication of highly ordered P3HT: PCBM nanostructures and its application as a supercapacitive electrode. Nanoscale 2012; 4(12): 3725–3728.

121.

Momodu

Bello

Dangbegnon

, et al. P3HT: PCBM/nickel-aluminum layered double hydroxide-graphene foam composites for supercapacitor electrodes. J Solid State Electrochem 2015; 19(2): 445–452.

122.

Fazio

Ridolfo

Neri

. Thermally thermally activated noble metal nanoparticles incorporated in Electrospun Fiber-based Drug Delivery Systemsctivated noble metal nanoparticles incorporated in electrospun fiber-based drug delivery systems. Current Nanomaterials 2019; 4(1): 21–31.

123.

Teresi

Marullo

Gambarotti

, et al. Improvement of oxidation resistance of polymer-based nanocomposites through sonication of carbonaceous nanoparticles. Ultrason Sonochem 2020; 61: 104807.

124.

Kausar

. Shape memory polyurethane/graphene nanocomposites: Shape memory polyurethane/graphene nanocomposites: Structures, properties, and applicationstructures, properties, and applications. J Plast Film Sheeting 2020; 36(2): 151–166.

125.

Guo

Mei

. Assessment of the toxic potential of graphene family nanomaterials. J Food Drug Anal 2014; 22(1): 105–115.

126.

Szeluga

Kumanek

Trzebicka

. Synergy in hybrid polymer/nanocarbon composites. A review, Synergy in hybrid polymer/nanocarbon composites. A review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2015; 73: 204–231.

127.

Lee

Chen

Peng

, et al. Polymer-based composites by electrospinning: Polymer-based composites by electrospinning: Preparation & functionalization with nanocarbonsreparation & functionalization with nanocarbons. Prog Polym Sci 2018; 86: 40–84.

Nanocomposites of thermoplastic matrices with non-covalent fullerene reinforcement—Structural diversity,physical impact and potential

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Fullerene

Dispersion Properties of Carbon Nanoparticles in Polymer Matrices

Polyamide Matrices with Fullerene Reinforcement

Polyurethane Nanocomposite with Fullerene Nanofiller

Thermoplastic Copolymers and Block Copolymers Reinforced with Fullerene

Viewpoints

Conclusions

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References