Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Thermoplastic-based composites are becoming the preferred material for structural and non-structural components in the composite production industries. One of the most critical elements determining the characteristics and performance of fiber-reinforced composites is the fiber content. The fiber volume fraction (Vf) of carbon/polyamide410 (C-PA410) composite is evaluated using standard acid digestion, the unique two-stage thermogravimetry (TGA) method and 2D image processing method, with Vf values of 24.0%, 23.1%, and 18.3%, respectively. For statistical purposes, a substantial number of samples from each composite batch were tested and analyzed. The two-stage TGA approach used in this study, involves measuring the constituent content of carbon fiber thermoplastic composites in nitrogen first and subsequently in air. The standard acid digestion and the two-stage TGA method used in this study provided comparable results. The 2D image processing method, on the other hand, yields a lower volume fraction of fiber. The two-stage TGA approach has been proven to be more convenient in terms of accuracy, safety, and speed. This technique has been validated by testing a control specimen of a material (Toray Cetex® TC910 PA6) with a known weight fraction.

Keywords

Fiber volume fraction C-PA composite standard acid digestion TGA technique 2D image processing carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite

Introduction

Carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) are the most advanced materials used to make structural and non-structural parts in the composite industry today. In 2012, the global demand for carbon fiber-reinforced polymers was 141,000 metric tons, which is expected to reach 200,000 metric tons by 2023.¹ Even while thermoset-resin composites have been used in industry for decades, thermoplastic polymer composites are becoming the preferred material due to their superior toughness, chemical resistance, performance at elevated temperatures, weldability, and recyclability.²

The fiber content is among the most important factors influencing the properties of fiber-reinforced composites. Fiber volume fraction and orientation influence stiffness, strength, and heat conductivity, among other properties. As a result, developing a cost-effective, fast, automatable, and precise method for measuring the fiber content of composite materials is a major concern. Even though there are pros and cons to each method, standard methods published by ASTM D3171—Standard Test Methods for Constituent Content of Composite Materials (ASTM Standard D3171-15, 2015), an image processing method that uses 2D microscopic cross-section images, or the TGA approach, have all been used in literature for determining the fiber content of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites.

Numerous studies have devised TGA-based methods for estimating the constituent composition of thermoset composite materials.^3–7 Only a few researchers have studied thermoplastic composite materials^2,6,8 used thermo-gravimetric analysis in an air atmosphere to quantify the fiber volume fractions of two distinct PAN-based carbon fiber reinforced composites, which were then validated using microscopic images. Results obtained with CFRP by^2,4 using the TGA-based method also confirmed those obtained by the acid digestion method. Several macro TGA measurements of raw materials (fibers and matrix) and their composites were performed by^3,8 to assess their degradation in two different purge gases (air and nitrogen).

A two-stage thermogravimetric testing procedure in which specimens are first subjected to decomposition under nitrogen, then after cooling, reheated with a mass-rate-controlled heating program to eliminate remaining char under technical air is used by.⁹ Due to the oxidation and thermal degradation of carbon fibers, TGA application for CFRP is more challenging.^3,10,11

A reasonable agreement is observed between the actual carbon fiber content and the carbon fiber content measured using the carbonization in nitrogen (CIN) method after the carbon fiber thermoplastic and a thermosetting composite specimen are carbonized in a nitrogen atmosphere along with a neat resin specimen that is used for adjusting the resin carbonization percentage.^12,13

Another study¹⁴ used digital image processing (DIP) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images to perform micrograph analysis, which was then used to calculate fiber volume fractions, and comparable volume fraction values were obtained with the burn-off resin technique.

Even though several researchers employed various techniques to evaluate the constituent content of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites, a comprehensive examination of each technique is lacking in the literature. Furthermore, the two-stage TGA approach described above demands a particular kind of TGA machine (a modulated TGA machine) and requires a longer testing period. Therefore, a unique two-stage TGA procedure is used in this work to avoid the stages of cooling and reheating. In addition, this procedure can be implemented in ordinary TGA machines without modulated heating and cooling requirements. The process is also validated using SEM images taken before and after the char-burning stage. To give thorough information on the relative merits of each method, all other constituent content determination techniques have also been evaluated.

Material and experimental methods

The fiber content of the C-PA410 composite is determined using three methods in this research: conventional acid digestion, 2D image processing, and the TGA technique. In each method, a minimum of four tests was analyzed for statistical purposes. The goal of this research is to undertake a thorough examination of fiber content determination methods for C-PA composites and to utilize a unique TGA procedure for a more convenient method of assessing constituent content in carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites.

Standard acid digestion method

Materials and equipment

Five specimens of C/PA410 unidirectional composite tape from Sioen Industries were used for the experiments. For acid digestion, a Harry Gestigkeit SD 9–230 Electrical Sandbath for controlled heating, a laboratory desiccator with KNF Laboport N 820.3 FT.18 vacuum pump to filter the fibers using sintered glass filter crucibles with a pore size of 1–1.6 µm were used. Digestion Reagents were used according to ASTM3171: Hydrogen Peroxide, H₂O₂ 35% aqueous and Sulfuric Acid, H₂SO₄ 98% aqueous

Procedure description

Volumetric representative C-PA composite specimens placed in five separate 100 mL flasks with 25 mL of sulfuric acid were electrically heated in a sand bath. Then, a 40 mL aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide is added and cooled in water. The fibers are then filtered through sintered glass crucibles under vacuum, washed, and dried for an hour at 100°C.

2D image processing method

Specimen preparation

Ten specimens of 10 mm width cut from the tape’s edge and middle embedded in epoxy and polished are used for imaging under a light microscope (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Embedded specimens of C-PA410 composite and Leica DM ILM inverted Microscope.

Method and equipment

The raw image has 2560*1920 pixels in the row and column lines, and the magnification was 100, 500, and 1000 times. In the width direction of each specimen, 8–10 pictures were taken and analyzed.

The analysis using ImageJ software entails utilizing the threshold function to calculate the area percentage of fiber and matrix in each image. The fibers appear white in the black and white spectrum in the range of 0–65,536 numbers, whereas the matrix appears grey (Figure 2). The threshold function was then used to determine the corresponding percentages of fiber and matrix using the auto-threshold function, and a slight manual modification on the thresholding limit is made to select the entire fiber area. Finally, the area percentages were summarized using the analyze particle function.

Figure 2.

Microscopic image of C-PA tape specimen fiber layer (*500 magnification) and binarized image.

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) method

Materials and equipment’s

Thermomechanical measurements using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) were carried out with C/PA410 specimens of mass 16–19 mg. The composite specimens were taken from different areas of the tape. Measurements were performed at various temperatures and atmospheres. Air and nitrogen were utilized as purge gas and the gas flow rate was 100 mL/min for all the experiments. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) (XL30 by Philips) was used to analyze the specimens.

Procedure description

The experimental settings utilized in the following TGA procedures are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Experimental parameters and procedures of the TGA measurements.

No.	First Heating Cycle			Isothermal Stage		Second Heating Cycle
No.	Temp. Range (°C)	Heating Rate (°C/min)	Purge Gas	Time peri-od (min)	Temp. Range (°C)	Heating Rate(°C/min)	Purge Gas
E1	35–500	20	Nitrogen	60
E2	35–1000	10	Nitrogen
E3	35–1000	10	Air
E4	35–505	10	Nitrogen	15	505–550,	5,	Air
E4	35–505	10	Nitrogen	15	550–1000	10	Air
E5	35–505	10	Nitrogen	15
E6	35–505	10	Nitrogen	15	505–525	5	Air

Result and discussion

Density measurement

The density measurement result of the C-PA410 composite tape using Quantachrome Instruments’ Multipycnometer density measuring device is summarized in Table 2. The density values of matrix material (PA-410) (1.05 g/cm²) and carbon fiber (1.76 g/cm²) are taken from MatWeb material property data available online.

Table 2.

The summarized result of C-PA410 composite tape’s density measurement.

	Measured Density (g/cm²)
	Run 1	Run 2	Run 3	Run 4	Average	STDEV
C-PA composite	1.2098	1.2163	1.2235	1.2209	1.22	0.01

Standard acid digestion method

The weight and volume percentage of fiber (reinforcement) are derived. Five specimens are utilized to obtain a valid estimate, and the results of each are presented in Table 3.

Table 3.

Summarized results of weight and volume percentage of the reinforcement (fiber) content of C-PA composite specimens.

Specimen no.	Mass of the composite (mi) (g)	Mass of the fiber (MF) (g)	Density of the composite (g/cm³)	Density of the fiber (g/cm³)	Reinforcement content, weight Percentage (Wr), %	Reinforcement content, volume percentage (Vf), %
1	1.5062	0.5104	1,22	1.76	33.89	23.44
2	1.482	0.5266			35.53	24.58
3	1.400	0.4894			34.96	24.18
4	1.3789	0.4845			35.14	24.30
5	1.461	0.4997			34.20	23.66
Mean	1.45	0.5			34.7	24.0
STDEV	0.05	0.02			0.7	0.5

Reinforcement content, weight percent

W_{r} = (\frac{M_{f}}{M_{i}}) * 100

(1)

Where:

M_{i}

= Initial mass of the composite, g,

M_{f}

= Final mass of the fiber after digestion, g

M_{f} = M_{c r} - M_{c}

(2)

Where:

M_{c r}

= Mass of the crucible with reinforcement, g,

M_{c}

= Mass of the crucible mass, g

Reinforcement content, volume percentage

V_{r} = (\frac{M_{f}}{M_{i}}) * 100 * \frac{ρ_{c}}{ρ_{r}}

(3)

$ρ_{r}$ = density of the reinforcement, $g / {c m}^{3}$ , $ρ_{c}$ = density of the composite, $g / {c m}^{3}$

The SEM images of fiber residues (Figure 3) after the acid digestion, filtration, washing, and drying processes show that the fibers are unaffected by the chemicals used in the process and that the diameter of the fibers is uniform with a clean surface. Using the known values of mass and density of the composite specimen and residue fiber, a further calculation for weight and volume percent of the matrix and void volume is conducted. Table 4 displays the overview of the results.

Figure 3.

SEM images (X1000) of fiber residues after the digestion, filtration and oven drying process.

Table 4.

Summarized results of weight and volume percentage of the matrix and void content of C-PA composite specimens.

Specimen no.	Mass of the composite (mi) (g)	Mass of the fiber (MF) (g)	Density of the composite (g/cm³)	Density of the matrix (g/cm³)	Matrix content, weight Percent (W_m)	Matrix content, volume percent (V_m)	Void Volume (Vv)
1	1.5062	0.5104	1.22	1.05	66.11%	76.67%	(−0.11%)
2	1.482	0.5266			64.47%	74.76%	0.66%
3	1.4	0.4894			65.04%	75.42%	0.39%
4	1.3789	0.4845			64.86%	75.22%	0.48%
5	1.461	0.4997			65.80%	76.30%	0.04%
Mean	1.45	0.5			65.3%	75.7%	0.3%
STDEV	0.05	0.02			0.7	0.8	0.3

Matrix content, weight percent

W_{m} = (\frac{{M_{i} - M}_{f}}{M_{i}}) * 100

(4)

Matrix content, volume percent

V_{m} = (\frac{{M_{i} - M}_{f}}{M_{i}}) * 100 * \frac{ρ_{c}}{ρ_{m}}

(5)

$ρ_{m}$ = density of the matrix, $g / {c m}^{3}$

Void volume

V_{v} = 100 - (V_{r} + V_{m})

(6)

2D Image processing method

The volume fractions of fiber in perfect unidirectional composites can be seen as the mean of the average values of the percentage area of fibers in different composite specimens. In this study, a total of 30 images (*500 magnification) of 10 specimens were analyzed, with three sections of each specimen being analyzed. The average of three slices for each specimen is presented in Table 5. The average fiber volume fraction is 18.3%, whereas the standard deviation is 4.3. Due to the very varied fiber distribution of the C-PA410 composite tape, a large standard deviation was obtained. The image analysis showed that the number of fibers reduced considerably closer to the edge.

Table 5.

Percentage area of fiber and matrix of C-PA410 composite specimens using 2D image processing method.

Specimen number	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	Mean	STDEV
Mean of the average % area of the fiber	22.30	11.53	23.25	17.84	12.30	21.91	17.03	19.16	18.36	19.32	18.3	4.3
Mean of the average % area of matrix and void	77.70	88.47	76.75	82.16	87.70	78.10	82.97	80.84	81.63	80.68	81.7	4.3

In comparing the 2D image analysis approach to the conventional acid digestion method in this investigation, the volume percent of fiber is much less with the 2D image analysis technique. This is because the method relies on the two-dimensional cross-sections of the composite tape, which makes it challenging to obtain volumetric information and necessitates perfect unidirectional fiber orientations in a composite tape. Additionally, the segmentation of area fractions of fibers using the threshold function is affected by human skill in specimen preparation (grinding and polishing), which impacts the image quality. The image analysis technique, in contrast to other techniques, can offer additional microstructural details such as fiber size, shape, distribution, flaws, and the presence of voids.

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) method

Fiber weight content can be determined from TGA (thermogravimetric analysis) curves by analyzing the weight loss of a composite material containing fibers and a matrix material as it is heated. Since most fiber and matrix materials decompose in a different temperature range, we can identify the percentage of each constituent, but the major challenge is the overlap of the decomposition of char with the decomposition of fibers. Figure 4 shows how the composite material decomposes progressively as it is heated according to the four procedures described in Table 1.

Figure 4.

Weight loss percentage of C/PA410 specimens with increment in temperature (Procedure E1-E4).

Procedure E1

At the beginning of the temperature ramp, a negligible amount of weight reduction (0.86%–1.42%) occurred in all specimens. These explain the removal of moisture. The polymer then underwent a bulk decomposition (59.7%–63.9%) and stabilized once the temperature reached 500°C. The weight loss percentage of the polymers has shown variation, as described in Table 6, indicating that the mass percentage of polymer and fiber varies in the specimens taken from various regions of the composite tape. Three specimens mass decomposition converged at a mass loss of 63%, whereas the other specimens did so at a lower mass loss rate.

Table 6.

Weight loss % of dirt and moisture, and polymer in procedure E1 and E2.

Specimen number	Heating-up + isothermal Procedure (E1)		Dynamic heating Procedure (E2)
Specimen number	Weight loss % of dirt and moisture	Weight loss % of the polymer	Weight loss % of dirt and moisture	Weight loss % of the polymer
1	0.86	59.7	1.25	65.2
2	0.93	60.9	1.23	64.97
3	0.76	63.2	1.28	63.02
4	1.3	63.9	1.07	56.96
5	1.42	63.2	—	—
MEAN	1.1	62.0	1.2	62.5
STDEV	0.3	1.8	0.1	3.8

In this TGA technique, a carbon or carbonaceous char residue that cannot be further broken down into smaller volatile particles in a nitrogen atmosphere is left over as a consequence of the aromatic rings present in polyamide. Due to this, it is difficult to quantify the amount of remaining fibers, and the mass percentage of retained char must be determined.

Procedure E2

In this dynamic heating method, the specimen is heated at a constant rate from 35°C to 1000°C in a nitrogen atmosphere. Similar to procedure E1, the removal of dirt and moisture (1.07%–1.28%) happened in all specimens at the beginning of the temperature ramp, followed by a mass decomposition of polymer (56.96%–65.2%), which subsequently tends to stabilize after the temperature reaches 500°C.

Very minimal mass loss has been noticed in the 500°C–1000°C temperature range. Three specimens' mass degradation converged in a weight loss range of 63–65%. The results for the other two specimens showed outlier mass loss percentages. According to this investigation, the composite decomposed in a nitrogen atmosphere with almost negligible fiber mass loss, and the char produced by the PA’s decomposition did not degrade further.

Procedure E3

In this procedure, the specimen is heated constantly in an air atmosphere from 35°C to 1000°C and reveals two key stages of degradation, as shown in Figure 5. The first stage (33–490°C) was similar to the initial observation made under nitrogen. The degradation of the polymer matrix and the char that had already formed overlapped in the 490–525°C range. Because these two processes overlap in this temperature range, determining fiber volume fraction accurately becomes problematic.

Figure 5.

Weight loss (green) and weight loss rate (blue) vs time plot of C-PA410 specimens from 33-1000°C in air atmosphere.

At 525°C, a further degradation stage was found. The thermal degradation of carbon fibers and further degradation of char from fiber degradation occurred during the second degradation stage (525–650°C). Above 650°C, degradation in technical air led to full composite decomposition with no remnant. In this procedure, an average of 1.2% and 59.6% of moisture and polymer resulted, respectively. The calculated fiber volume fraction of C/PA410 using the first three TGA procedures is summarized in Table 7.

Table 7.

Calculated fiber volume fraction of C/PA410 using Procedure E1,E2 and E3.

Procedure	Mean weight percentage of fiber	Density of fiber (g/cm³)	Density of composite (g/cm³)	Fiber volume fraction (%)
Procedure E1	38.0	1.76	1.22	26.0
Procedure E2	37.0			25.6
Procedure E3	40.4			27.2

Assuming no voids, the volume percentage of fiber can be calculated by:

V_{f} = {% W}_{f} * \frac{ρ_{c}}{ρ_{f}}

(7)

$ρ_{f}$ = density of the fiber, $g / {c m}^{3}$ , $ρ_{c}$ = density of the composite, $g / {c m}^{3}$ , ${% W}_{f}$ = weight % of the fiber

Procedure E4

When nitrogen was used as an inert atmosphere in procedures E1 and E2, the matrix decomposed without causing any thermal impact on the carbon fibers but left a char residue. The amount of polymer matrix and the residual amount of char must be known accurately to determine fiber volume fraction. As a result, procedure E4 combines the first step of heating under nitrogen to degrade the polymer matrix solely, followed by the second stage of heating under technical air to decompose the char and fiber in sequence.

The decomposition pattern and stages obtained using the two-stage approach are shown in the rate of weight loss percentage plot (blue) of Figure 6. The first stage, which is dynamic heating in a nitrogen atmosphere followed by isothermal stay, caused the polymer matrix to degrade, leaving a small quantity of char behind with carbon fibers. The second stage, which is heating in the air atmosphere, resulted in two degradation steps, the first of which occurred between 505 and 525°C. This is a short transition phase of char degradation. Second, above this point, fiber degradation occurs at the maximum weight-loss rate with two decomposition peaks seen due to an increase in the heating rate from 5 °C/min to 10 °C/min to save operation time.

Figure 6.

Two stage weight loss (green) and weight loss rate (blue) vs time plot of C-PA410 specimens.

The results of this method are summarized in Table 8. The average weight percentage of fiber was 32.2%, with a 1.8% average weight percentage of char. The above findings show that utilizing two-stage thermogravimetry analysis is an accurate approach to determining the fiber volume fraction of C-PA410 composite specimens.

Table 8.

Weight percentage results of dirt and moisture, polymer, fiber, and char (procedure E4).

Specimen Number	Weight loss % of dirt and moisture	Weight loss % of the polymer	Weight % of the fiber + char	Weight % of the fiber	Weight % of the char
1	1.14	64.07	34.63	32.56	2.07
2	1.10	65.26	33.48	32.4	1.08
3	1.23	65.06	33.64	31.71	1.93
4	1.24	64.53	34.17	32.11	2.06
MEAN	1.2	64.7	34.0	32.2	1.8
STDEV	0.1	0.5	0.5	0.4	0.5

The summary of the calculated volume percentage of fiber is presented in Table 9. The difference of 1.8% between the TGA and standard acid digestion methods could account for the slight degradation of carbon fibers without sizing during TGA.

Table 9.

Calculated volume percentage of fiber (Procedure E4).

Specimen number	Weight % of the fiber	Density of the Composite (g/cm³)	Density of the fiber (g/cm³)	Volume % of the fiber
1	32.56	1.22	1.76	22.52
2	32.4			22.41
3	31.71			21.94
4	32.11			22.21
MEAN	32.2			22.3
STDEV	0.4			0.3

Procedure E4 on a control specimen

To verify the validity of procedure E4, we followed the same procedure to determine the Vf of a control specimen from a material (Toray Cetex® TC910 PA6) of known weight fraction. From the datasheet, the fiber weight fraction (Wf) of the unidirectional composite is 60%, and the density of the composite is 1.45 g/cm³. The results summarized in Table 10 proved that procedure E4 provides an accurate result of the weight percentage of the fiber, 59%, with a 1% margin of error from the actual weight percentage indicated in the datasheet.

Table 10.

Weight percentage results of dirt and moisture, polymer, fiber, and char of a control specimen (Toray Cetex® TC910 PA6) using procedure E4.

Specimen Number	Weight loss % of dirt and moisture	Weight loss % of the polymer	Weight % of the fiber	Weight % of the char	Volume % of the fiber
1	0.82	40.08	57.48	1.33	48.4
2	0.84	38.47	58.11	1.75
3	0.68	39.67	58.29	1.3
4	0.72	35.82	61.17	1.82
MEAN	0.8	38.5	58.9	1.6
STDEV	0.1	1.9	1.6	0.3

Procedure E5 and E6

The residue of the specimens was collected after heating up to 505°C and an isothermal stay of 15 min in a nitrogen atmosphere for procedure E5 and after an additional step of heating up to 525°C in an air atmosphere for procedure E6. SEM imaging was performed on these specimens that had been heated to the red-marked interruption point on the curve (Figure 6). Images of specimens taken in procedure five show char residue scattered over carbon fibers (Figure 7). The specimen had a form of loosely attached fibers after heating to 525°C in an air atmosphere according to procedure 6, and the SEM images indicate bundles of fibers with nearly no apparent char remaining (Figure 8).

Figure 7.

SEM images of specimen after heating up to 505°C and isothermal period of 15 min in nitrogen atmosphere (Procedure E5).

Figure 8.

SEM images of specimen after heating up to 505°C, isothermal period of 15 min in nitrogen atmosphere, and heating up to 525°C in air atmosphere (Procedure E6).

Correction of the TGA method

The fiber volume fraction value obtained by the TGA method described in procedure E4 is comparable to that obtained by the standard acid digestion method. However, the degradation of carbon fibers without sizing during the first stage of pyrolysis and the char-burning stage should be taken into consideration. To accomplish this, neat carbon fiber (T300) specimens are heated in nitrogen up to 505°C, isothermal for 15 min, followed by heating under air atmosphere up to 525°C with a similar heating rate used in procedure E4 (Figure 9). Then the degradation of carbon fibers during these stages is used to calibrate the two-stage TGA method. The results are summarized in Table 11.

Figure 9.

TGA correction run with procedure E4 on neat carbon fiber.

Table 11.

Summary of weight loss percentage of neat carbon fibers from TGA method correction run.

Specimen number	1	2	3	4	Average	Stdev
Weight loss % up to 525°C	0.643	0.921	0.72	0.89	0.8	0.1

Considering the correction value of the TGA method, the fiber volume fraction is 23.1%, which is 0.9% less than the result obtained from the standard acid digestion method (Table 12).

Table 12.

Summary of the fiber volume fraction results of the Standard Acid Digestion, 2D Image Processing, and the TGA Method.

	Standard acid digestion	2D image processing	TGA method
Mean fiber volume fraction (%)	24.0	18.3	23.1
STDEV	0.5	4.3	0.3

Comparing the four different TGA procedures used in this study, the first two TGA procedures carried out in a nitrogen environment overestimate the fiber percentage with an error of 8.0 and 6.6, while procedure E3 carried out in an air atmosphere results in a higher error, 13.1. Procedure E4’s two-stage TGA method, which uses nitrogen in the first stage and air in the second, yielded a comparatively lower error of 3.8 (Table 13).

Table 13.

Error percentage comparison between the four different TGA procedures.

Procedure	TGA fiber volume fraction (Vf)	Actual fiber volume fraction (Vf)	Error %
E1	26.0	24.0	8.0
E2	25.6	24.0	6.6
E3	27.2	24.0	13.1
E4 + correction	23.1	24.0	3.8

Conclusion

In this experimental study, the fiber content of a C-PA composite was assessed using three methods: standard acid digestion, 2D image processing, and the TGA method. Each method’s outcomes have been properly examined. Standard acid digestion, 2D image processing, and TGA were used to evaluate the Vf values of unidirectional C-PA410 specimens, yielding Vf values of 24.0%, 23.1%, and 18.3%, respectively. By using a unique two-stage TGA approach (in nitrogen and air atmosphere), comparable values between standard acid digestion and the TGA technique were obtained. Unlike the two-stage TGA methods described in the literature, this method excludes the cooling and reheating stages after the first stage, and it also doesn’t necessitate a special TGA machine with a mass-controlled heating program. The 2D image processing method provides a significantly lower volume fraction of fiber when compared to the standard acid digestion method. This is because the segmentation of area fractions of fibers using the threshold function is influenced by human skill in specimen preparation (grinding and polishing), which affects the image quality. Additionally, the method is based on the two-dimensional cross sections of the composite tape, which makes volumetric information difficult to get and requires ideal unidirectional fiber orientations in a composite tape. The 2D image processing method, unlike others, can provide extra microstructural information such as fiber size, shape, distribution, defects, and void existence.

Furthermore, a larger specimen size is used for determining the FVF of C/PA410 composites using the acid digestion method in accordance with the ASTM D3039 standard. This provides a representative measure of global FVF. However, this method is not capable of determining FVF variations at smaller scales of fiber/matrix level. In contrast, the 2D image processing method used smaller scale specimen sizes to determine the FVF, and it revealed FVF variations at smaller scales of fiber/matrix level. However, the results showed that even if we collected several images of the cross-section of the composite tape, the RVE size is quite large to get a representative measure of the global FVF of the composite material. Moreover, despite the fact that the sensitivity and accuracy of the TGA measurements can be impacted by the specimen size, utilizing 18–20 mg of a representative volume of the composite material showed that the two-stage TGA approach can be used to accurately measure global FVF.

The standard acid digestion method involves the use of strong acids, such as concentrated sulfuric acid, and subsequent boiling of the acid, which is both hazardous to laboratory personnel and harmful to the environment. The two-stage TGA approach used in this study involves two stages of decomposition, first in nitrogen and then in air. Because char formed by polymer decomposition cannot be removed in nitrogen and carbon fibers may begin to degrade in air, an optimized temperature for switching from nitrogen to air, as well as the temperature range spent in the air atmosphere to remove the char, must be carefully specified for the specific composite material with the exception of higher char temperature matrix materials. A TGA run on neat carbon fibers was performed to correct the degradation of carbon fibers without sizing during the first stage of pyrolysis and the char burning stage, and a correction value of 0.79% was introduced. The SEM images of specimens collected before and after heating in the air atmosphere are used to validate the two-stage TGA method. The two-stage TGA approach was used to determine the Vf of a material (Toray Cetex® TC910PA6) of known weight fraction and has proven to be more convenient in terms of accuracy, safety, and speed.

The two-stage TGA is a versatile technique that can be used to measure the fiber volume fraction of a variety of carbon fiber/thermoplastic composites, though it should be noted that the accuracy of the measurement may be affected by a number of factors, including the quality and homogeneity of the composite specimen, the heating rate and specific temperature range, environment, and dwell time used in the analysis.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research work was carried out in the frame of the HGPP project (International University Partnership Services for the Establishment of Postgraduate Programmes in Ethiopia) funded through GIZ GmbH and the International University Partnership for the Establishment of PhD Programmes in Ethiopia funded by the Ethiopian Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

ORCID iD

Kasahun Niguse Asfew

References

“Carbon fiber reinforced plastics demand worldwide 2010-2023 | Statista.” https://www.statista.com/statistics/380572/projection-demand-for-carbon-fiber-reinforced-plastics-globally/ (accessed 19 July 2021).

Giżyński

Romelczyk-Baishya

. Investigation of carbon fiber–reinforced thermoplastic polymers using thermogravimetric analysis. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2021; 34(1): 126–140. DOI: 10.1177/0892705719839450.

Bücheler

Kaiser

Henning

. Using thermogravimetric analysis to determine carbon fiber weight percentage of fiber-reinforced plastics. Compos Part B Eng 2016; 106: 218–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.028.

Moon

Bang

Choi

, et al. A technique for determining fiber content in FRP by thermogravimetric analyzer. Polym Test 2005; 24(3): 376–380. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.10.002.

Yee

Stephens

. A TGA technique for determining graphite fiber content in epoxy composites. Thermochim Acta 1996; 272(1–2): 191–199. DOI: 10.1016/0040-6031(95)02606-1.

Kim

Choi

Kumar

SKS

, et al. Thermo-gravimetric analysis method to determine the fiber volume fraction for PAN-based CFRP considering oxidation of carbon fiber and matrix. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2017; 102: 40–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.024.

Huang

Gao

. Comparison of four methods for determining fiber content of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 2016; 21(3): 251–258. DOI: 10.1080/1023666X.2016.1139395.

Mohsin

MAA

Iannucci

Greenhalgh

. Fibre-volume-fraction measurement of carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using thermogravimetric analysis. Heliyon 2019; 5(1): e01132. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01132.

Grund

Orlishausen

Taha

. Determination of fiber volume fraction of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer using thermogravimetric methods. Polym Test 2019; 75: 358–366. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.02.031.

10.

Dolo

Férec

Cartié

, et al. Model for thermal degradation of carbon fiber filled poly(ether ether ketone). Polym Degrad Stab 2017; 143: 20–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.06.006.

11.

Régnier

Fontaine

. Determination of the thermal degradation kinetic parameters of carbon. J Therm Anal Calorim 2001; 64: 789–799.

12.

Wang

Ning

Vaidya

, et al. Fiber content measurement for carbon fiber–reinforced thermoplastic composites using carbonization-in-nitrogen method. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2018; 31(1): 79–90. DOI: 10.1177/0892705716679481.

13.

Wang

Ning

Vaidya

, et al. Development of a carbonization-in-nitrogen method for measuring the fiber content of carbon fiber reinforced thermoset composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2015; 73: 80–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.025.

14.

Morales

Claure

Alvarez

, et al. Evaluation of fiber content in GFRP bars using digital image processing. Composites Part B: Engineering 2020; 200: 108307. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108307.

Investigation of fiber content evaluation methods of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Material and experimental methods

Standard acid digestion method

Materials and equipment

Procedure description

2D image processing method

Specimen preparation

Method and equipment

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) method

Materials and equipment’s

Procedure description

Result and discussion

Density measurement

Standard acid digestion method

Reinforcement content, weight percent

Reinforcement content, volume percentage

Matrix content, weight percent

Matrix content, volume percent

Void volume

2D Image processing method

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) method

Procedure E1

Procedure E2

Procedure E3

Procedure E4

Procedure E4 on a control specimen

Procedure E5 and E6

Correction of the TGA method

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References