Effect of surface-modified nanoparticles on the mechanical properties and crystallization behavior of PP/CaCO 3 nanocomposites

Abstract

The aim of this work was to study the effect of surface-modified calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) nanoparticles in the mechanical properties and crystallization behavior of polypropylene (PP) homopolymer. Pimelic acid (Pa) was used as a surface modifier for nano-CaCO₃ (nCC). Three compositions of PP/nCC composites were prepared in a corotational twin-screw extruder machine with nCC content of 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%. The results of scanning electron microscopy showed that the Pa treatment enhanced the interfacial adhesion between the filler and the matrix, indicating the improvement in the compatibility between PP and nCC. The measurements of the mechanical properties showed that the elastic modulus (E _c) and impact strength (S _IC) of the composites increased at first and then decreased with the addition of fillers, and the tensile yield stress (σ _yc) was reduced at the same time. The crystallization properties of virgin PP and its composites were studied with differential scanning calorimetry. The results demonstrated that, in comparison with virgin PP and PP/nCC, the addition of the Pa-treated nCC fillers led to a higher crystallization temperature, and nucleation and crystallization were improved at the same time.

Keywords

Nanocomposites pimelic acid thermal properties mechanical properties scanning electron microscopy

Introduction

Polymer nanocomposites are a new class of particle-filled polymer composites in which at least one dimension of the dispersed particles is in the nanometer range. Polymer nanocomposites have attracted increasing attention in recent years because of their significant improvement in physical and/or chemical properties over the matrix polymers.^1–3 It is well known that nanoparticles play an important role in their application to polymer nanocomposites. Polymer-based nanocomposites have been extensively studied in research and application because the addition of the nanoparticles provides an increased stiffness, toughness, and dimensional stability. The aggregation of the nanoparticles, however, owing to their high surface energy, strongly decreases the properties of the nanocomposites, which enormously limits their engineering applications. Many studies indicated that the excellent properties of nanocomposites distinctly depend on the particle dispersion which has close relationship with the manufacturing method.^4,5 Many manufacturing methods, such as in situ polymerization,⁶ intercalation method,⁷ sol–gel method,⁸ and melt compounding,⁹ have been used to prepare the composites. In all these methods, melt compounding has been regarded as a prevalent means for reasons of economy, practicability, and environment friendliness.

Polypropylene (PP) is one of the most widely used commercial semi-crystalline polymers. The main attraction of PP is its high-performance-to-cost ratio. However, its utilization has been limited because of its poor impact strength (S _IC) and relatively low service temperature. PP can also be easily modified to achieve greatly enhanced properties. It is now well recognized that the use of inorganic fillers is a useful tool for improving stiffness, toughness, hardness, chemical resistance, dimension stability, and gas barrier properties of PP.^10, ¹¹ The effects of inorganic fillers on the mechanical and physical properties of the PP composites strongly depend on the filler size, shape, aspect ratio, interfacial adhesion, surface characteristics, and degree of dispersion.^12, ¹³ Of these inorganic fillers, calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) is most commonly used mainly for its availability in readily usable form and low cost. Therefore, the PP composites filled by micro-CaCO₃ (mCC) and nano-CaCO₃ (nCC) have been extensively studied.^14–16 When compared with PP/mCC composites, PP/nCC composites have attracted considerable interests, because it is believed that the tremendous interfacial area between the filler and the polymer helps to influence the composite’s properties to a great extent. Yang et al.¹⁵ demonstrated that nCC particles had better toughening effect on improving the S _IC of PP matrix than mCC particles. However, good adhesion does not exist between the fillers and thermoplastic matrices. As a nonpolar substance, PP cannot easily combine with the polar CaCO₃. Furthermore, when the particle size of CaCO₃ measures up to the nanometer, the defect is much more obvious: with decreasing particle size, the specific surface area increases, and both the surface free energy and the cohesion forces become stronger, so it is difficult to get good dispersion in the PP matrix because of particle reunification. Therefore, to improve the properties of the nanocomposite, it is necessary to investigate the surface modification of nCC. The conventional surface treatment is coating the particles with an organic compound such as stearic acid and titanate-coupling agents. Macromolecular compatibilizer¹⁷ and irradiation-induced graft polymerization¹⁸ are also used to modify the surface of the particles. The coating process of chemical deposition is a new method for modifying the surface of inorganic particles.¹⁹ However, there has been little study on the modification of nCC particles covered with pimelic acid (Pa). We recently found that Pa can act as an efficient surface modifier for wollastonite,²⁰ suggesting that Pa could have the same effect on CaCO₃.²¹ Thus, Pa was used as a surface modifier for nCC. Surface treatment significantly influenced the crystallization behavior of PP/nCC composites due to the changing interfacial interaction between nCC particles and PP matrix. The surface treatment of nCC could change the heterogeneous nucleation effect of nCC on PP. Similar result was obtained when surface was modified with an aluminate-coupling agent.²² In this work, we mainly developed a study of the mechanical and crystalline properties of PP/nCC-Pa composites.

Experimental

Materials

The grade of PP used in this work was SEETEC homopolymer PP (LG Chem, South Korea). This acts as the matrix. The homopolymer PP has a density of 0.90 g/cm³ and a melt flow rate of 14 g/10 min (2.16 kg at 230°C). We were interested in the effect of surface modification of filler particles on the dispersion and properties of compounds; we studied both unmodified nCC and nCC surface modified by a Pa (analytical reagent and identified as Pa), both kindly supplied by SK Corporation (South Korea). Ethanol (analytical reagent) (Hyo Sung Co. Anyang, South Korea) was commercially available and used as received. CaCO₃ nanoparticles were supplied by Shiraishi Kogyo Kaisha Ltd (Japan) and had a density of 2.7 g/cm³ and a diameter of 60–80 nm.

Sample preparation

Surface treatment of CaCO₃ nanoparticles

Unmodified nCC was prepared by drying its water suspension in an oven at 100°C to constant weight. Surface treatment of nCC was as follows: 150 g nCC was put into a 500-ml three-necked flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer. Subsequently, a solution of 1.5 g Pa (1% Pa) or 4.5 g Pa (3% Pa) was added to 250 ml ethanol. The mixture was reacted for 1 h at 80°C under vigorous stirring. Then the ethanol was distilled out and the Pa-treated nCC (nCC-Pa) was dried to constant weight at 90°C.

Preparation of PP/nCC-Pa composites

Before melt mixing, PP- and surface-treated CaCO₃ nanoparticles were dried in a vacuum oven at 80°C for 6 h and then cooled down to room temperature. The materials were stored in a desiccator prior to processing. nCC, in four different concentrations (5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%), was added to PP to produce binary composites. All the materials were simultaneously added into the extruder after previous mixing. Blending with different filler concentrations was carried out in a twin-screw extruder (Brabender plasticorder, model: PLE-331). The capacity of the mixing chamber being 30 ml. The processing temperature, rotor speed, and blending time were set at 180°C, 60 r/min, and 10 min, respectively. The sample weight of each blending was controlled at 60 g. After 10 min, the mixing chamber of the Brabender apparatus was opened and the resulting mixing was taken out. The resultant mixture was compression-molded in a hot press at 190°C for 5 min between two steel plates under a pressure of 7 MPa. Finally, the pressure was released and the mold removed from the plates. This was followed by cooling to room temperature between two thick-metal blocks kept at room temperature. A template frame was used to ensure a constant film thickness (1 mm). The samples were cut into standard shapes and sizes (according to the ASTM D-638-91 standard) for testing the mechanical properties. The specimens were then sealed in plastic bags as they waited the processing and analysis. There were three composites, PP/nCC, PP/nCC-1Pa, and PP/nCC-3Pa, in this experiment, and the Pa concentrations were 0, 1, and 3 wt%, respectively. The concentration of PP was 100 wt%, when the concentration of nCC was 0%.

Mechanical properties measurements

Mechanical properties of virgin PP and PP/nCC nanocomposites were studied in both tensile and impact tests. Standard specimens were sampled from the compression molded sheet and then conditioned at a temperature of 25 ± 2°C and the relative humidity of 50 ± 5% for 24 h. Tensile testing was performed on a screw-driven universal testing machine (Instron 4466) equipped with a 10 kN electronic load cell and mechanical grips. The tests were conducted at a crosshead speed of 30 mm/min, and data were acquired by a computer. All tests were carried out according to the ASTM D638-91 standard, and five replicates were tested for each sample to get an average value. Izod impact tests of notched samples were carried out according to ASTM D256-93a standard, the instruments was Ceast pendulum impact tester (Model 6545/000). The dimension of the specimens (length × width × thickness) was 63.50 × 13 × 3.20 mm³.

Morphological observation

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JEOL, Japan JSM-6360LV) was employed to study the fracture surfaces of all tested samples. The SEM samples were held in liquid nitrogen for 30 min and then broken into two pieces. The fractured surfaces of the specimen were coated with a thin layer (10–20 nm) of gold palladium.

DSC measurements

The melting and crystalline behaviors of virgin PP and samples were measured with a Perkin Elmer DSC-7 (Perkin Elmer, Inc, Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA). First, virgin PP and samples were heated from 25 to 250°C for 10 min to eliminate all of the thermal history in the materials. Then, the samples were cooled to 25°C at a cooling rate (R) of 10°C/min to obtain their crystalline characteristics. Last, the samples were heated to 250°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min to obtain their melting characteristics. The temperature and heat capacity scales were calibrated from the melting scans of high-purity indium and zinc samples at the same heating rate. All measurements were carried out under the nitrogen atmosphere environment. The sample weight was in the range of 5–8 mg.

Results and discussion

Mechanical properties and dispersion of nanoparticles in PP matrix

CaCO₃ nanoparticles were incorporated to PP homopolymer in order to achieve better S _IC and reinforcement of the matrix. Figure 1 shows the effect of nCC, nCC-1Pa, and nCC-3Pa concentrations on the elastic modulus (E _c) of PP/nCC, PP/nCC-1Pa, and PP/nCC-3Pa composites, respectively. It can be seen that when the weight fraction of nCC is less than 15%, that is, φ < 15 wt%, E _c of all three composites increases with increasing φ and then decreases. There is a maximum value of E _c at φ = 15%. The maximum E _c value of PP/nCC composite was 793.8 MPa. In contrast, the maximum E _c of PP/nCC-1Pa and PP/nCC-3Pa composites were 835.8 and 865.3 MPa, about 31 and 36% higher than that of the virgin PP, respectively. According to the trend of the E _c variation, the PP/nCC-3Pa composite increased more obviously than PP/nCC composite. The large increase in E _c suggests an efficient stress transfer from polymer matrix to inorganic fillers. A significant increase in the E _c was observed for 15 wt% nCC; and beyond 15% nCC, the values started to decrease. The decrease was related to the weak bond strength, adhesion, or lower molecular interaction caused by the higher content of the filler (nCC) in the PP matrix structure.²³ Usually, nCC increased the stiffness and E _c. Although nCC increased the bond strength, and the molecular interaction decreased because of excessive stress, there was shrinkage between the filler and PP. However, in this study, the addition of more than 15% nCC to PP reduced the modulus. The addition of more than 15% nCC not only increased stress but also increased microcracks and provided weak adhesion between the filler and matrix. Especially when the filler content was greater than 15%, the modulus decreased.

Figure 1.

Effects of the filler content (φ, wt%) on the elastic modulus (E _c) of PP/nCC, PP/nCC-1Pa, and PP/nCC-3Pa composites. PP: polypropylene; nCC: nano-calcium carbonate; Pa: pimelic acid.

S _IC is an important characteristic for impact toughness of materials. Figure 2 shows the relationship between the S _IC and the content of nCC. It can also be observed from Figure 2 that when φ < 15%, S _IC for all three composites increases with increasing φ and then decreases. There is a maximum of S _IC at φ = 15%. The results show that the impact toughness of PP can be improved to some extent when PP is filled with suitable concentration of nCC. This peak phenomenon of the curve of S _IC versus φ can be explained as follows: the nCC fillers will act as inclusions that produce stress concentration and will cause matrix yielding and plastic deformation, which will absorb part of the impact energy and result in enhancing impact toughness correspondingly. With further increasing concentration of nCC, the S _IC of PP/nCC composites decreased. This is attributed to the poor compatibility between PP and nCC. The nCC particles had polar, hydrophilic surfaces and high surface free energy, which was incompatible with nonpolar, hydrophobic, and low free energy PP; thus, they could not be wetted by the molten matrix. The addition of unmodified nCC in the PP matrix induced lost of stress concentrators, which led to negative effects on the mechanical properties. Thus, the S _IC of PP/nCC composites decreased. In order to improve the dispersion of the filler in the polymeric matrix and increase in the interfacial adhesion between filler and matrix, Pa is introduced to modify PP/nCC composites. After PP/nCC composites are modified with Pa, the impact properties are better than those of PP/nCC composites and virgin PP, and increase with the increase in Pa content. The maximum S _IC of PP/nCC-1Pa and PP/nCC-3Pa composites were 13.8 and 15.6 kJ/m² and about 221 and 263% higher than that of the virgin PP, respectively. As stated above, Pa improved the compatibility of PP matrix and nCC. At the same time, nCC reacted with Pa to form calcium pimelate. It is believed that Pa can cover or pack nanoparticles, therefore reduce the surface energy of nanoparticles and improve the dispersion of nCC in PP. On the other hand, as a reactive polar small molecule, Pa is prone to diffuse into the agglomerates of nanoparticles and prevents them from agglomerating. With the action of high temperature and shear stress during the process, Pa can homopolymerize or graft to PP, consequently improving the interfacial action between the nanoparticles and the matrix and raising the impact properties of the composites.

Figure 2.

Effects of the filler content on the impact strength (S _IC) of PP/nCC, PP/nCC-1Pa, and PP/nCC-3Pa composites. PP: polypropylene; nCC: nano-calcium carbonate; Pa: pimelic acid.

Figure 3 illustrates the correlation between the tensile yield stress (σ_yc) and the content of nCC of the three nanocomposites. It can be seen that when φ < 5%, the σ_yc of all three composites increases slightly with increasing φ. For φ > 5%, σ_yc decreases gently, but PP/nCC-3Pa and PP/nCC-1Pa were higher than that of PP/nCC. The maximum appears at φ = 5%. It means that the σ_yc of PP can be enhanced to some extent, when PP is filled with suitable content of nCC. The decrease in the σ_yc of the obtained composite at higher filler content (φ > 5%) was attributed to the agglomeration of the nCC particle’s weak interfacial adhesion that existed between the PP matrix and the nanoparticles, and hence the load-bearing capacity of cross-sectional area of composites decreased, and only a small amount of stress could be transferred from the matrix to inorganic particles; hence, the tensile stress showed decrement in the magnitude; in this case, agglomerated particles easily debonded from the matrix and could not bear any fraction of external load ultimately decreasing the tensile stress. These results are consistent with the results of the research study carried out by by Li et al.²⁴ In contrast, outstanding effectiveness of nCC-Pa increasing the Tensile strength (TS) of PP composites was demonstrated. As the concentration of the filler increased in the composites filled with nCC-Pa, the TS was first remarkably increased and then decreased. When the concentration of the filler was 5 wt%, the maximum TS found was 36.1 MPa for nCC-1Pa and 36.4 MPa for nCC-3Pa, which was 2 and 3% higher than that of the unmodified composite, respectively. Altogether, the mechanical properties of the three composites were as follows: PP/nCC-3Pa > PP/nCC-1Pa > PP/nCC, a composite with good mechanical properties could be achieved when the filler loading was 15 wt%.

Figure 3.

Effects of the filler content on the tensile yield stress (σ_yc) of PP/nCC, PP/nCC-1Pa, and PP/nCC-3Pa composites. PP: polypropylene; nCC: nano-calcium carbonate; Pa: pimelic acid.

Figure 4(a) to (c) presents SEM micrographs of the impact-fracture surface of PP/nCC, PP/nCC-1Pa, and PP/nCC-3Pa nanocomposites, respectively, with 10 wt% filler. The particles of nCC in Figure 4(a) were dispersed in the matrix of PP irregularly, and some big aggregates were exposed on the fracture surface, with a particle size greater than 3 μm. By observing these aggregations, we found that they were formed of many primary particles. The PP/nCC sample had a large particle size of 3–4 μm. From an analysis of the mechanical properties, we determined that this composite exhibited impact energy only slightly higher than that of virgin PP and much lower than that of the PP/nCC-3Pa composites. Figure 4(b) and (c) presents photographs of the impact fracture surface of PP/nCC-1Pa and PP/nCC-3Pa composites. In PP/nCC-1Pa, there were no aggregates and the average particle size was smaller than that of nCC. When the amount of the Pa covering the nCC particles increased, the dispersion of the nCC-3Pa particles in the PP matrix became more uniform, as Figure 4(c) demonstrates. Most nCC-3Pa particles were under 80 nm, and the combination of nCC-3Pa particles with the PP matrix was very close; this was the main reason for the high toughness.

Figure 4.

Scanning electron micrographs of composites (10 wt% filler): (a) PP/nCC, (b) PP/nCC-1Pa, and (c) PP/nCC-3Pa. PP: polypropylene; nCC: nano-calcium carbonate; Pa: pimelic acid.

Melting and crystallization behavior of PP and its nanocomposites

Figure 5 shows the nonisothermal crystallization curves of PP and PP/10 wt% nCC (nCC10), PP/nCC10-1Pa (nCC10-1Pa), and PP/nCC10-3Pa (nCC10-3Pa) composites at the cooling rate of 10°C/min. From these curves, it can be seen that the addition of nCC10, nCC10-1Pa, and nCC10-3Pa fillers significantly change the crystallization behavior of PP. It is found that the crystallization peak of the specimens shifts to a high temperature, and the movement of nCC10-3Pa was the most obvious. Table 1 represents the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data for nonisothermal crystallization and melting. T _oc, T _pc, T _mp, ▵H _m, ▵T, and X _c are the onset crystallization temperature, peak crystallization temperature, melting peak temperature, melting enthalpy, crystallization ratio, and value of crystallinity, respectively. The onset crystallization temperatures (T _oc) and the peak crystallization temperatures (T _pc) of PP and its nanocomposites against several cooling rates (5, 10, 15, and 20°C) are shown in Figure 6(a) and (b). It can be seen that the addition of nCC10-1Pa and nCC10-3Pa fillers increases the T _pc to about 4–9°C higher than that of PP at different cooling rates, indicating that fillers can act as nucleating agent of PP. Many other nanopaticles were also found to have nucleation effect for PP crystallization.^16,25 However, nCC10 induced only a slight increase in the crystallization temperature (T _pc) in the range of 1–3°C at different cooling rates.

Figure 5.

DSC crystallization curves of virgin PP, PP/10 wt% nCC (nCC10), nCC10-1Pa, and nCC10-3Pa composites. DSC: differential scanning calorimetry; PP: polypropylene; nCC: nano-calcium carbonate; Pa: pimelic acid.

Figure 6.

(a) The onset crystallization temperatures (T _oc) and (b) the peak crystallization temperatures (T _pc) of virgin PP, nCC10, nCC10-1Pa, and nCC10-3Pa composites. PP: polypropylene; nCC: nano-calcium carbonate; Pa: pimelic acid.

Table 1.

DSC crystalline parameters of virgin PP and composites.

Sample	T _oc (°C)	T _pc (°C)	T _mp (°C)	▵H _m (J/g)	T _mp − T _pc = ▵T (°C)	X _c (%)
Virgin PP	119.5	113.6	163.8	84.3	50.2	46.4
nCC10	122.5	115.4	164.4	86.2	49.0	47.6
nCC10−1Pa	124.8	118.5	165.1	85.7	46.6	46.8
nCC10−3Pa	128.4	121.1	165.3	87.4	44.2	48.3

DSC: differential scanning calorimetry; PP: polypropylene; nCC: nano-calcium carbonate; Pa: pimelic acid.

After the process of crystallization, the samples were reheated. The DSC heating curves of PP and nanocomposites are displayed in Figure 7. It indicates that there are nearly no changes in the shape of curves for virgin PP and nanocomposites. Both virgin PP and nanocomposites seem to have the same value of melting temperature (T _mp). These values are listed in Table 1. On the basis of the area of heating curves in Figure 7, the degrees of crystallinity X _c for virgin PP and its nanocomposites can be calculated by the following equation²⁶

Figure 7.

DSC melt curves of virgin PP, nCC10, nCC10-1Pa, and nCC10-3Pa composites. DSC: differential scanning calorimetry; PP: polypropylene; nCC: nano-calcium carbonate; Pa: pimelic acid.

X_{c} = \frac{Δ H}{(1 - ϕ) Δ H_{0}} \times 100 %

where ▵H is the endothermal enthalpy of the sample, ▵H ₀ is the endothermal enthalpy of PP when it crystallizes completely, φ is the mass fraction of the filler. Values of X _c for PP and nanocomposites are also listed in Table 1. The degree of crystallinity for nanocomposites is higher than that of virgin PP. The degree of crystallinity of nCC10-1Pa and nCC10-3Pa increased by up to 1 and 4% than that of virgin PP, respectively.

Figure 8 shows the DSC nonisothermal crystallization curves of nCC-3Pa with different filler contents. These curves imply that the crystallization temperature increased with increasing concentration of nCC-3Pa. DSC crystalline parameters of nCC10-3Pa with different filler contents are listed in Table 2. The data demonstrate that the concentration of the nCC10-3Pa fillers had some influence on PP crystallites; the crystallization temperature increased by 5.5, 7.5, 10.1, and 13.3°C when the filler concentration was 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%, respectively. Additionally, the degree of crystallinity of PP was increased by the addition of the nCC-3Pa filler. The minimum X _c value of nCC20-3Pa was achieved with a loading of 20 wt%; it was 52.1%. From the DSC data, we concluded that the presence of nCC10-1Pa and nCC10-3Pa markedly influenced the crystallization behavior of PP after the surface treatment of nCC particles with Pa, the nucleating ability of PP was improved by the addition of the fillers.

Figure 8.

DSC crystalline curves of PP/nCC-3Pa with different filler contents: (1) 5, (2) 10, (3) 15, and (4) 20 wt%. DSC: differential scanning calorimetry; PP: polypropylene; nCC: nano-calcium carbonate; Pa: pimelic acid.

Table 2.

DSC crystalline parameters of PP/nCC-3Pa (nCC-3Pa) with different filler contents.

Sample	T _pc (°C)	▵H _c (J/g)	X _c (%)
Virgin PP	113.6	84.3	46.4
nCC5-3Pa	119.1	85.7	46.9
nCC10-3Pa	121.1	87.4	48.3
nCC15-3Pa	123.7	88.1	49.2
nCC20-3Pa	126.9	89.3	52.1

DSC: differential scanning calorimetry; PP: polypropylene; nCC: nano-calcium carbonate; Pa: pimelic acid.

Conclusions

From the above discussion, we can gain the following conclusions:

In this work, PP/nCC, PP/nCC-1Pa, and PP/nCC-3Pa nanocomposites were prepared by melt blending. The E _c and Izod S _IC of the PP/nCC composites were obviously increased as the nCC content increased, but the σ_yc first slightly increased and then decreased as the nCC content increased.

When φ < 15%, the E _c and S _IC of the notched specimens enhance with increasing φ, then drops down gently. The maximum E _c and S _IC occurs at φ = 15% in the range from 0 to 20%. In addition, modification with Pa further increased the E _c and S _IC of the composites.

When φ < 5%, the σ_yc increases with addition of φ and then decreases gradually. It appears that the maximum σ_yc occurs at φ = 5% in the range from 0 to 20%.

Unlike untreated nCC, SEM micrographs show a uniform size distribution for nCC-Pa, which dispersed well in PP. After surface modification by the Pa, the adhesion between the filler particles and PP matrix was enhanced and the aggregation could be avoided.

DSC measurements show that, in comparison with virgin PP and PP/nCC, the addition of the nCC-Pa fillers led to a higher crystallization temperature, and nucleation and crystallization improved at the same time.

Footnotes

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Luyt

Dramićanin

Antić

Djoković

. Morphology, mechanical and thermal properties of composites of polypropylene and nanostructured wollastonite filler. Polym Test 2009; 28: 348–356.

Saminathan

Selvakumar

Bhatnagar

Fracture studies of polypropylene/nanoclay composites. Part I: effect of loading rates on essential work of fracture. Polym Test 2008; 27: 296–307.

Chen

Wan

Zhang

. Effect of nano-CaCO₃ on mechanical properties of PVC and PVC/Blendex blend. Polymer 2004; 45: 5985–5994.

Gopakumar

Page

DJYS

. Polypropylene/graphite nanocomposites by thermo-kinetic mixing, Polym Eng Sci 2004; 44(6): 1162–1169.

Kiss

Fekete

Pukanszky

Aggregation of CaCO₃ particles in PP composites: effect of surface coating. Compos Sci Technol 2007; 67(7-8): 1574–1583.

Jiang

Bin

Matsuo

. Electrical and mechanical properties of polyimide-carbon nanotubes composites fabricated by in situ polymerization. Polymer 2005; 46(18): 7418–7424.

Song

Wang

Fan

Liao

. Thermal analysis of poly (vinyl alcohol)/graphite oxide intercalated composites. Polym Degrad Stabil 2001; 73(1): 29–31.

Sonobe

Kikuta

Takagi

. Dispersion and alignment of organic-clay composites with in polysilicate thin films by the sol-gel method. Chem Mater 1999; 11(4): 1089–1093.

Dondero

Gorga

. Morphological and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube/polymer composites via melt compounding. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 2006; 44(5): 864–878.

10.

Bartczak

Argon

Cohen

Weinberg

Toughness mechanism in semi-crystalline polymer blends: II. high-density polyethylene toughened with calcium carbonate filler particles. Polymer 1999; 40: 2347–2365.

11.

Tabtiang

Venables

. The performance of selected unsaturated coatings for calcium carbonate filler in polypropylene. Eur Polym J 2000; 36: 137–148.

12.

Mitsuishi

Kodama

Kawasaki

. Mechanical properties of polypropylene filled with calcium carbonate. Polym Eng Sci 1985; 25: 1069–1073.

13.

Demjen

Pukanszky

Jozsef

. Evaluation of interfacial interaction in polypropylene/surface treated CaCO₃ composites. Compos Part A 1998; 29: 323–329.

14.

Mai

Rong

Ruan

Zhang

. Phase structure and mechanical properties of ternary polypropylene/elastomer/nano-CaCO₃ composites. Compos Sci Technol 2007; 67: 2997–3005.

15.

Yang

Sun

Feng

. Mechanical properties and morphologies of polypropylene with different sizes of calcium carbonate particles. Polym Compos 2006; 27: 443–450.

16.

Huang

Chen

Yao

. Non-isothermal crystallization behavior of polypropylene with nucleating agents and nano-calcium carbonate. Eur Polym J 2005; 41: 2753–2760.

17.

Avella

Cosco

Lorenzo

Errico

. Influence of CaCO₃ nanoparticles shape on thermal and crystallization behavior of isotactic polypropylene based nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim 2005; 80: 131–136.

18.

Rong

Zhang

Friedrich

. Irradiation-induced surface graft polymerization onto calcium carbonate nanoparticles and its toughening effects on polypropylene composites. Polym Eng Sci 2005; 45: 529–538.

19.

Hanprasopwattana

Srinivasan

Sault

Datye

. Titania coatings on monodisperse silica spheres (characterization using 2-propanol dehydration and TEM). Langmuir 1996; 12: 3173–3179.

20.

Meng

Dou

. Effect of pimelic acid on the crystallization, morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/wollastonite composites. Mater Sci Eng Part A 2008; 492: 177–184.

21.

Dou

. Effect of metallic salts of pimelic acid and crystallization temperatures on the formation of crystalline form in isotactic poly (propylene). J Macromol Sci Phys 2007; 46: 1063–1080.

22.

Wan

Xie

Guo

Zhou

Cao

. Effects of nanoparticle treatment on the crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of polypropylene/calcium carbonate nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 2006; 102: 3480–3488.

23.

Barbosa

Capiati

. Processability and mechanical properties of ternary composites PP/EPDM/GF. Polym Compos 2000; 21: 377–386.

24.

Tjong

Meng

Zhu

. Fabrication and properties of poly (propylene carbonate)/calcium carbonate composites. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 2003; 41: 1806–1813.

25.

Hao

Yuhai

Kancheng

. Non-isothermal crystallization behavior of PP/Mg(OH)₂ composites modified by different compatibilizers. Thermochim Acta 2007; 457(1-2): 27–34.

26.

Mark

. Thermal characterization of polymeric materials, Edith A. Turi, Ed., Academic, New York, 1981, 972 pp. Price: $98.00. J Polym Sci Polym Lett Ed 1982; 20(5): 281–282.

Effect of surface-modified nanoparticles on the mechanical properties and crystallization behavior of PP/CaCO 3 nanocomposites

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Experimental

Materials

Sample preparation

Surface treatment of CaCO3 nanoparticles

Preparation of PP/nCC-Pa composites

Mechanical properties measurements

Morphological observation

DSC measurements

Results and discussion

Mechanical properties and dispersion of nanoparticles in PP matrix

Melting and crystallization behavior of PP and its nanocomposites

Conclusions

Footnotes

Funding

References

Surface treatment of CaCO₃ nanoparticles