Predicting Progressive Delamination of Stiffened Fibre-Composite Panel and Repaired Sandwich Panel by Decohesion Models

Abstract

An approach employing decohesive models with mixed damaged scale and using total fracture energy was developed to simulate the delamination process of a stiffened fibre-composite panel and a repaired composite sandwich panel. Two decohesive material models - a bilinear interfacial decohesive function and the other a cubic polynomial interfacial decohesive function - were developed by using total fracture energy G_c, and based on using interface elements. In comparison with traditional numerical methods in fracture mechanics, this approach automatically predicts the failure load, crack path and the residual stiffness in the fracture process. Applications in this article are delamination analysis of a stiffened fibre-composite panel under four-point bending conditions and a repaired composite sandwich panel under four-point bending test. Comparisons between modeling predictions and experimental observations show that these decohesive models perform well. This article compares the problem of numerical convergent failure between two decohesive material models.

Keywords

interfacial decohesion models interface finite element delamination growth composite materials and repairs mixed damage scale

References

1. Chen, J. , Crisfield, M.A. , Kinloch, A.J. , Busso, E.P. , Matthews, F.L. and Qiu, Y. (1999). Predicting progressive delamination of composite material specimens via interface elements. Journal of Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures, 6(4): 301-317.

2. Crisfield, M.A. , Mi, Y. , Davies, G.A.O. and Hellweg, H.B. (1997). Finite element method and the progressive failure modelling of composite structures. In: Owen, D.R.J. et al. (eds.), Computational Plasticity: Fundamentals and Applications, Part I. CIMNE: Barcelona. pp. 239-254.

3. Rahulkumar, P. , Jagota, A. , Bennison, S.J. and Saigal, S. (1999). Cohesive element modeling of viscoelastic fracture: application to peel testing of polymers. Journal of Solids and Structures, 1: 1-24.

4. Tvergaard, V. , Hutchinson, J.W. (1993). The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 41: 1119-1135.

5. Cui, W. and Wisnom, M.R. (1993). A combined stress-based and fracture-mechanics-based model for predicting delamination in composites. Composites, 6: 467-474.

6. Research report, EPSRC Grant GR/l33047, March 1999, No. 9, Centre for Composite Materials of Imperial College, London, UK.

7. Mespoulet, S. (1998). Through-thickness test methods for laminated composite materials. PhD Thesis, Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College.

8. Kruege, R. , Mingue, P.J , O’Brien, T.K. (1999). A method for calculating strain energy release rates in preliminary design of composite skin/stringer debonding under multi-axial loading. NASA Langley Research Center, TM-209365, ARL-TR-2012.

9. Report from DLR (Germany) 1999: BE-3444/BREU-0183.

10.

10. Chen, J. , Crisfield, M.A. , Kinloch, A.J. , Matthews, F.L. , Busso, E.P. and Qiu, Y. (1998). The application of interface elements in predicting progressive delamination of composite material specimens. In: Proceedings of NATO Advanced Studies Institute on Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures, Troia, Portugal, 12-24 July. Vol. 4, pp. 1-16.