This paper critically analyses neoliberal education policies, prioritizing market efficiency over ecological stewardship and social responsibility. This article argues that the resultant market-driven focus in educational leadership necessitates a transformative shift. A model emphasizing sustainability, civic duty, social justice, and community engagement is proposed, alongside practical strategies for integrating ecological literacy, ethical decision-making, and collaborative practices within educational institutions. The timely call for this paradigm shift is central to the article's significance, addressing urgent ecological and social challenges through responsible stewardship. This research contributes to the growing body of literature calling for transformative change within education. The article's significance lies in its timely call for a shift to address urgent ecological and social challenges through Steward-Leadership, for citizen stewards of the planet.
AppleM (2000) Between neoliberalism and neoconservatism. In: Globalisatin and education. London: Routledge, 57–78.
2.
AuldEMorrisP (2023) Global Salvation Inc.: Sir Michael Barber’s education for the apocalypse and the church of Deliverology®. Comparative Education59(3): 341–361.
BallS (2012) Global Education Inc. New Policy Networks and the Neo-Liberal Imaginary. Abingdon: Routledge.
5.
BatesR (2008) States, markets and communities: is there room for educational leadership?Journal of Educational Administration and History40(3): 195–208.
6.
BeachJ (2021) The Myths of Measurement and Meritocracy: Why Accountability Metrics in Higher Education Are Unfair and Increase Inequality. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
D’AlisaGFedericoDKallisG (2015) Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era. London: Routledge.
9.
EacottS (2016) Demythologising ‘leadership': The Trojan Horse of managerialism. In: SamierE (eds) Ideologies in educational administration and leadership. London: Routledge, 159–175.
10.
FriereP (1968) Pedagogia do Oprimido. 1st edn.. Sao Paulo: Paz e terra.
11.
GadottiM (2009) Eco-pedagogy: extending the educational theory of Paulo Freire to sustainability. Young people, education, and sustainable development: Exploring principles, perspectives, and praxis. In: CorcoranPOsanoP (eds) Young People, Education and Sustainable Development. Leiden: Brill, 107–112.
12.
Gardner-McTaggartA (2022) Educational leadership and global crises; reimagining planetary futures through social practice. International Journal of Leadership in Education25(4): 647–663.
13.
Gardner-McTaggart A (2025) Sustainable educational leadership and the climate crisis; Knowledge, power and positive futures. In: Arar K, Guarjardo M, Tian M, et al. (eds) Educational Leadership for an Equitable, Resilient and Sustainable Future. Abingdon: Routledge.
14.
Gardner-McTaggart A and Palmer N (2018) Global citizenship education, technology, and being. Globalisation, Societies and Education 16(2): 268-281.
15.
GillS (2012) Global crises and the crisis of global leadership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GirouxH (2014) Neoliberalism's War on Higher Education. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
17.
GunterH (2002) Leaders and Leadership in Education. London: Sage.
18.
HabermasJ (2019) Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
19.
HarveyD (2007) Neoliberalism as creative destruction. 2007: The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science610(1): 21–44.
20.
JessenTDBanNCClaxtonNX, et al. (2022) Contributions of Indigenous Knowledge to ecological and evolutionary understanding. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment20(2): 93–101.
21.
JonesBBallS (2023) Neoliberalism and education. Oxon & New York: Routledge.
22.
KliampaA (2024) Transforming education in an era of climate change. From economic growth to degrowth discourses and cases of eco-logical practices in education. Doctoral Thesis. University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
23.
KliampaA (2025) Chapter 5. Combating Global Climate and Knowledge Crises through Sustainable Educational Leadership. In: Gardner-McTaggartA (ed.) Sustainable Educational Leadership and the Climate Crisis. London: Routledge, 152–174.
24.
McCowenT (2023) The climate crisis as a driver for pedagogical renewal in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education28(5): 933–952. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2197113
25.
McLeodS (2011) Albert Bandura's social learning theory. London: Simply Psychology.
26.
MonbiotGHutchinsonP (2024) Invisitble Doctrine; The Secret History of Neoliberalism. London. Penguin.
27.
OjalaMCunsoloAOgunbodeC, et al. (2021) Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: A narrative review. Annual Review of Environment and Resources1(35–58): 46.
28.
OzgaJ (2016) Trust in numbers? Digital education governance and the inspection process. European Educational Research Journal15(1): 69–81.
29.
OzgaJ (2020) The politics of accountability. Journal of Educational Change21(1): 19–35.
30.
OzgaJLingardB (2007) Globalisation, education policy and politics. In: The RoutledgeFalmer reader in education policy and politics. London: Routledge, 75–92.
31.
RaoMPowellR (2021) The climate crisis and the rise of eco-anxiety. BMJ Opinion6.
ShieldsC (2024) Transformative Leadership in Education: Equitable, Inclusive, and Quality Education in an Uncertain and Complex World. New York: Taylor & Francis.
34.
ShieldsCHesbolK (2020) Transformative leadership approaches to inclusion, equity, and social justice. Journal of School Leadership1(3-22): 30.
35.
SilovaI (2021) Facing the anthropocene: Comparative education as sympoiesis. Comparative Education Review65(4): 587–616.
36.
SmythJ (2016) Critical perspectives on educational leadership in the context of the march of neoliberalism. In: SamierE (eds) Ideologies in educational administration and leadership. London: Routledge, 147–158.
37.
TröhlerDMaricicV (2021) Data, trust and faith: the unheeded religious roots of modern education policy. Globalisation, Societies and Education19(2): 138–153. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1872371.
38.
WrightN (2001) Leadership,‘bastard leadership’ and managerialism: confronting twin paradoxes in the Blair education project.Educational Management & Administration23(3): 275–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X010293003
