The study intended to investigate the role of destructive leadership behavior, and teachers’ demographic characteristics on teachers’ social engagement with students in colleges of teacher education in the State of Amhara. A mixed method with an explanatory sequential design was employed. 397 teachers and 366 students participated in the quantitative data collection (questionnaire), whereas the qualitative data were collected with the help of interviews with college deans and teachers. Data collected through a questionnaire was analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics. On the other hand, narration and interpretation were employed for qualitative data analysis. Findings revealed that deans’ destructive leadership behavior was exhibited significantly. Teachers were socially engaged with students (t (396) = 58.902, d = 0.54, p = .000). Deans’ destructive leadership behavior and demographic characteristics explain teachers’ social engagement with students. However, demographic characteristics only have a minimal contribution in explaining teachers’ social engagement with students. In conclusion, demographic characteristics have no role in teachers’ social engagement with students but destructive leadership behavior plays a role. Finally, recommendations were forwarded to potential stakeholders.
AaslandMSSkogstadANotelaersG, et al. (2010) The prevalence of destructive leadership behavior. British Journal of Management21(2): 438–452.
2.
AbeyaGFrewA (2016) An assessment of educational leaders’ multicultural competencies in Ethiopian public universities. European Scientific Journal12(10): 387–402. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574384
3.
AhsanMJKhalidMH (2023) Laissez-Faire Leadership. In Leadership Approaches in Global Hospitality and Tourism. Copenhagen Business School, Denmark: IGI Global, 61–72.
4.
AnithaJ (2014) Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management63(3): 308–323.
5.
AryDJacobsLSorensenC (2010) Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed). University of Exeter, Exeter: Cengage Learning.
6.
AydinASarierYUysalŞ (2013) The effect of school principals’ leadership styles on teachers’ organization commitment and job satisfaction. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri13: 806–811.
7.
AyenalemKAAbateSGMohammedSJ, et al. (2022) Academic collaboration in Ethiopian high er education institutions: From a senior-junior staff support perspective. Heliyon8(12): 1–10.
8.
BamfordMWongCALaschingerH (2013) The influence of authentic leadership and areas of work-life on work engagement of registered nurses. Journal of Nursing Management21(3): 529–540
9.
BesieuxTDriesenHEuwemaM, et al. (2015) Team empowerment and performance: Feedback as leverage for continuous development.
ChanESHoSKIpFF, et al. (2020) Self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction among teaching assistants in Hong Kong’s inclusive education. Sage Open10(3): 1–11.
12.
ChristianMSGarzaASSlaughterJE (2011) Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology64(1): 89–136.
13.
CreswellJW (2012) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 4th ed.Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
14.
CreswellJWCreswellJD (2018) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.
15.
EinarsenSAaslandMSSkogstadA (2007) Destructive leadership behavior: A definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly18(3): 207–216.
16.
ETP (2023) Ethiopian Education and Training Policy, Ministry of Education, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
17.
FekedeTTynjäläP (2015) Professional learning of teachers in Ethiopia: Challenges and implications for reform. Australian Journal of Teacher Education40(5): 1–26.
HartmanRLBarberEG (2020) Women in the workforce: The effect of gender on occupational self- efficacy, work engagement, and career aspirations. Ender in Management: An International Journal35(1): 92–118.
20.
HaydonTMacSuga-GageASSimonsenB, et al. (2012) Opportunities to respond: A key component of effective instruction. Beyond Behavior22(1): 23–31.
21.
HollisLP (2015) Bully university? The cost of workplace bullying and employee disengagement in American higher education. SAGE Open.
22.
HooblerJMBrassDJ (2006) Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology91(5): 1125–1133.
23.
IbrahimYIRahelNKGemechuGT (2017) Academic staff turnover the intention in Madda Walabu University, Bale Zone, South-East Ethiopia. International Journal of Higher Education6(3): 21–28.
24.
Klahn cuñaBMaleT (2022) Toxic Leadership and Academics’ work engagement in higher education: Across sectional study from Chile. Educational Management Administration & Leadership17411432221084474.
25.
KlassenRMYerdelenSDurksenTL (2013) Measuring teachers’ engagement: Development of the Engaged Teachers Scale (ETS). Frontline Learning Research1(2): 33–52.
26.
KrejcieRMorganD (1970) Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement30(3): 607–610.
27.
LeeYEissenstatSJ (2018) An application of work engagement in the job demands-resources model to career development: Assessing gender differences. Human Resource Development Quarterly29(2): 143–161.
28.
LeraMD (2015) Leadership challenges to transformative change for quality education in public universities: A case of Wolayta Sodo University. African Education Research Journal3(3): 170–183.
29.
Machado-TaylorMDLWhiteKGouveiaO (2014) Job satisfaction of academics: Does gender matter?Higher Education Policy27(3): 363–384.
30.
MameliCBiolcatiRPassiniS, et al. (2018) School context and subjective distress: The influence of teacher justice and school-specific well-being on adolescents’ psychological health. School Psychology International39(5): 526–542.
31.
MantikeiBChristaURSintaniL, et al. (2020) The role of responsible leadership in determining the triple-bottom-line performance of the Indonesian tourist industry. Contemporary Economics14(4): 463–474.
MerkineBBisaYAyeleA (2019) The relationship between student-teachers interaction and academic achievement of trainee teachers in Dilla College of Teacher Education. Global Journal of Human-Social Science19(3): 35–48.
34.
MitikuAAHondeghemATroupinS (2017) Administrative leadership: Understanding the preferred leadership roles of the Ethiopian civil service managers. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies7(5): 1–39.
35.
MoremiTB (2019) Work Engagement and Burnout Among Public and Private School Teachers. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg. Masters theses.
36.
Mourssi-AlfashM (2014) Workplace bullying and its Influence on the perception of organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior in higher education. Doctoral dissertation, Capella University. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global (1524003793).
37.
MuffKDelacosteCDyllickT (2022) Responsible leadership competencies in leaders around the world: Assessing stakeholder engagement, ethics and values, systems thinking, and innovation competencies in leaders around the world. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management29(1): 273–292.
38.
MuijsD (2004) Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. Sage Publications. https:// doi.org/10.18276/ejsm.2016.20-01
39.
MulatuDBefikaduZ (2017) Governance of Ethiopia public universities in southern region: Professional & administrative accountability perspective. OSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR- JHSS)22(5): 86–98,
40.
NaumanSZhengCAhmadR (2021) Employee career outlook and turnover: Unleashing the roles of career adaptability and career satisfaction in international construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management147(11): 04021150.
41.
PallantJ (2016) SPSS Survival Manual: A Step-By-Step Guide to Data Analysis using IBM SPSS. University of Melbourne: Routledge.
42.
ParistiowatiMRahmawatiYFitrianiE, et al. (2022) Developing preservice chemistry teachers’ engagement with sustainability education through an online project-based learning summer course program. Sustainability14(3): 1783.
43.
ParkCKLimDHJuB. (2016) Transformational Leadership and Teachers’ Engagement in an International Context. In Handbook of Research on Global Issues in the Next-Generation Teacher Education, 22–42.
44.
PaulikK (2020) Some psychological factors related to work engagement in teachers. The New Educational Review59: 203–213.
45.
PawlowskaBBraunSPeusC, et al. (2010) Academic Leadership: The Effect of Leader-Follower Incongruence and Cognitive Processes on Perceptions of Leader Adversity. In: SchynsBHansbroughT (eds) When Leadership Goes Wrong: Destructive Leadership, Mistakes, and Ethical Failures. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc, 479–512.
46.
RahimRJabeenN (2021) Exploring the effects of despotic leadership on employee engagement, employee trust and task performance. Management Science Letters11(2021): 223–232.
47.
RaniDLAbdieA (2017) Top management's ethical leadership and its relation to organizational commitment. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences6(2): 141–152.
48.
RizaniFSyamAYLisandriL (2022) Mediating effect of earnings management on financial performance: The importance of good corporate governance. Australasian Accounting,Business and Finance Journal16(4): 14–28.
49.
RobertVVandenbergheC (2022) Laissez-faire leadership and employee well-being: The contribution of perceived supervisor organizational status. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology31(6): 940–957.
50.
SalinD (2003) Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and participating in structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations56: 1213–1232.
51.
SamuelZTilahunSEjiguD, et al. (2023) The Status of Teachers Collaboration in Ethiopian Public Universities found in the Amhara region. Heliyone12848.
52.
SaxenaVSrivastavaRK (2015) Impact of employee engagement on employee performance–Case of manufacturing sectors. International Journal of Management Research and Business Strategy4(2): 139–174.
53.
SchaubroeckJWalumbwaFOGansterDC, et al. (2007) Destructive leader traits and the neutralizing influence of an “enriched” job. The Leadership Quarterly18(3): 236–251.
54.
SchweitzerMEOrdóñezLDoumaB (2004) Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal47(3): 422–432.
55.
SellamiALSawalhiRRomanowskiMH, et al. (2022) Definitions of educational leadership–Arab educators’ perspectives. International Journal of Leadership in Education25(5): 767–786.
56.
ShawJBEricksonAHarveyM (2011) A method for measuring DL and identifying types of destructive leaders in organizations. The Leaders Quarterly22(4): 575–590.
57.
ShuckBHerdAM (2012) Employee engagement and leadership: Exploring the convergence of two frameworks and implications for leadership development in HRD. Human Resource Development Review11(2): 156–181.
58.
TesfawTA (2014) The relationship between transformational leadership and job satisfaction the case of government secondary school teachers in Ethiopia. Educational Management Administration &Leadership42(6): 903–918.
59.
TomaSGCatanăŞGrădinaruC (2020) Leadership: An overview. Manager32: 51–59.
WhitneyTCooperJTLingoAS (2017) Increasing student engagement through opportunities to respond. Kentucky Teacher Education Journal: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Kentucky Council for Exceptional Children3(2): 46–62.
62.
YanQBlighMCKohlesJC (2014) Absence makes the errors go longer: How leaders inhibit learning from errors. Zeitschrift für Psychologie222: 233–245.
63.
YavasA (2016) Sectoral differences in the perception of toxic leadership. Social and Behavioral Sciences2(229): 267–276.
64.
YidnekachewE (2015) Academic Freedom in Public Universities: A Lived Experience in Wollo University. Ethiopia: Wollo University.
65.
ZafarSMuhammadF (2022) Impact of Destructive Leadership and Corporate Governance on ethical practices in Financial Sector of Pakistan. Doctoral thesis, Durham University.
66.
Zahed-BabelanAKoulaeiGMoeinikiaM, et al. (2019) Instructional leadership effects on teachers’ work engagement: Roles of school culture, empowerment, and job characteristics. CEPS Journal9(3): 137–156.
67.
ZineldinMHytterA (2012) Leaders’ negative emotions and leadership styles influence subordinates’ well-being. International Journal of Human Resource Management23: 748–758.
