The study aimed to identify the influence of head teachers’ change facilitator styles (CFS) on teachers’ concerns about ICT integration. The three CFS (responder, manager and initiator) were studied in relation to its influence on teachers’ seven stages of concern (unconcerned, informational, personal, management, consequence, collaboration and refocusing) about ICT integration. Both styles and concerns are embodied in the concerns-based adoption model, which guided the theoretical framework of the study. This quantitative study used CFS and stages of concerns questionnaire to collect data from 276 secondary school teachers. Initially, teachers’ concerns were explored, followed by head teachers’ CFS and their influence on teachers’ concerns about ICT integration. The results showed that secondary school teachers’ concerns, regarding ICT integration, were at the initial stages as reflected by their high mean scores on personal and informational stages. Findings inform about the responder as a dominant CFS used by secondary school head teachers. The data suggest differences in terms of the influence of head teachers’ three CFS on teachers’ concerns about ICT integration.
Al-FuraihSAAAl-AwidiHM (2018) Teachers’ change readiness for the adoption of smartphone technology: personal concerns and technological competency. Technology, Knowledge and Learning65(23):1–24.
2.
Al-HarthiASA (2016) Technological self-efficacy among school leaders in Oman: preliminary study. Journal of Further and Higher Education41(6):760–772.
3.
Al-RawajfihKFongFSIdrosSNS (2010) Stages of concern in integrating e-learning in discovery schools. Asian Social Science6(8):54–63.
4.
Al-SharijaM (2012) Leadership practices of Kuwaiti secondary school principals for embedding ICT. Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
5.
AndersonRDexterS (2005) School technology leadership: an empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly41(1):49–82.
6.
BaglibelMSamanciogluMOzmantarZK, et al. (2014) The relationship between school principals’ perceived change facilitator styles and teachers’ attitudes towards change. International Studies in Educational Administration42(3):55–67.
7.
BalochFA (2007) Role of head teachers, in Karachi Pakistan, in professional development of teachers through collaborative learning. Master’s Thesis, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
8.
BlauIPresserO (2013) e-Leadership of school principals: increasing school effectiveness by a school data management system. British Journal of Educational Technology44(6):1000–1011.
9.
BrukeRBarronS (2012) Project Management Leadership: Building Creative Teams, 2nd edn. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
10.
CetinkayaB (2012) Understanding teachers in the midst of reform: teachers’ concerns about reformed sixth grade mathematics curriculum in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology8(3):155–166.
11.
ChangIH (2012) The effect of principals’ technological leadership on teachers’ technological literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary schools. Journal ofEducational Technology & Society15(2):328–340.
12.
ChenWHoJMNgDFS (2013) School leadership in ICT implementation: perspectives from Singapore. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher22(3):301–311.
13.
CheungDYipD (2004) How science teachers’ concerns about school-based assessment of practical work vary with time: the Hong Kong experience. Research in Science & Technological Education22(2):153–169.
14.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
CreswellJ (2009) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach, 3rd edn. London: Sage Publications.
16.
DemetriadisSBarbasAMolohidesA, et al. (2003) Cultures in negotiation: teachers’ acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools. Computers & Education41(1):19–37.
17.
DexterS (2011) School technology leadership: artifacts in systems of practice. Journal of School Leadership21(2):166–189.
18.
FaisalAAzeemMAyshaF, et al. (2012) Impact of educational leadership on institutional performance in Pakistan. Journal of Public Administration and Governance2(1):57–94.
19.
FullanM (2007) The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
FullerF (1969) Concerns of teachers: a developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal6(21):207–226.
21.
GeorgeAAHallGEStiegelbauerSM (2006) Measuring Implementation in Schools: The Stages of Concern Questionnaire. Report. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
22.
GurrD (2004) ICT, leadership in education and e-leadership. Discourse25(1):113–124.
23.
Hadjithoma-GarstkaC (2011) The role of the principal’s leadership style in the implementation of ICT policy. British Journal of Educational Technology42(2):311–326.
24.
HallGEGeorgeAA (1999) The impact of principal change facilitator style on school and classroom culture. In: FreibergHJ (ed.) School Climate: Measuring, Improving and Sustaining Healthy Learning Environments. Philadelphia, PA: Palmer Press.
25.
HallGEHordSM (1987) Change in Schools: Facilitating the Process. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
HallGENegroniIAGeorgeAA (2013) Examining relationships between urban principal change facilitator style and student learning. International Journal of Leadership and Change1(1):36–46.
28.
HallGERutherfordWHordSM (1984) Effects of three principal styles on school improvement. Educational Leadership41(5):22–29.
29.
HallGEWallaceRDossettW (1973) A Developmental Conceptualization of the Adoption Process Within Educational Institutions. Report. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.
30.
HaoYLeeKS (2017) Inquiry of pre-service teachers’ concern about integrating Web 2.0 into instruction. European Journal of Teacher Education40(2):1–19.
31.
HinkleDEWiersmaWJursSG (2003) Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 5th edn. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
32.
HollingsworthMMrazekR (2004) Information Technology Leadership in Education: An Alberta Needs Assessment. Learning and Technology Research, Stakeholder Technology Branch. Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Learning.
33.
JogezaiNA (2019) Leadership change facilitation styles and teachers’ concerns about ICT integration. PhD Thesis, Universiti Sains, Pulau Penang, Malaysia.
34.
JogezaiNAIsmailSAMMBalochFA (2018) Secondary school teachers’ concerns about ICT integration: perspectives from a developing part of the globe. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education14(12):1–12.
JongMSYTsaiC (2016) Understanding the concerns of teachers about leveraging mobile technology to facilitate outdoor social inquiry learning: the EduVenture experience. Interactive Learning Environments24(2):328–344.
37.
KearsleyGLynchW (1994) Educational leadership in the age of technology: the new skills. In: KearsleyGLynchW (eds) Educational Technology: Leadership Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
38.
LiuYHuangC (2005) Concerns of teachers about technology integration in USA. European Journal of Teacher Education28(1):35–48.
39.
MishraPKoehlerMJ (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record108(6):1017–1054.
40.
NeumanWL (2014) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Pearson Education Limited.
41.
NiaziS (2012) School leadership and educational practices in Pakistan. Academic Research International7(2):312–319.
42.
NiekerkMVBlignautS (2014) A framework for information and communication technology integration in schools through teacher professional development. Africa Education Review2:236–253.
43.
OttestadG (2013) School leadership for ICT and teachers’ use of digital tools. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy8(2):107–125.
44.
ParkJHJeongDW (2013) School reforms, principal leadership, and teacher resistance: evidence from Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Education33(1):34–52.
45.
PepeTM (2016) Teacher perceptions and attitudes of classroom technology integration related to iPad. PhD Thesis, Walden University.
46.
PutehSNSalamKAAJusoffK (2011) Using CBAM to evaluate teachers’ concerns in science literacy for human capital development at the preschool. World Applied Sciences Journal14:81–87.
47.
QutoshiSBKhakiJ (2014) The role of a principal/headteacher in school improvement: a case study of a community-based school in Karachi, Pakistan. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education8(2):86–96.
48.
SamanciogluMBaglibelMBozbayindirF, et al. (2015) Educational leaders’ and teachers’ opinions about changes in the Turkish education system: a qualitative case study. International Journal of Leadership and Change3(1):41–50.
49.
SarafidouJONikolaidisDI (2009) School leadership and teachers’ attitudes towards school change: the case of high schools in Greece. International Journal of Learning16(8):431–440.
50.
SchrumLLevinBB (2016) Educational technologies and twenty-first century leadership for learning. International Journal of Leadership in Education19(1):17–39.
51.
SenunS (2002) The relationship between change facilitator styles of secondary school principals and school climate as perceived by teachers in the Church of Christ schools in Thailand. PhD Thesis, Illinois State University.
52.
SheningerE (2014) Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
53.
StangorC (1998) Research Method for the Behavioral Sciences. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
54.
StewartSK (2012) Principal change facilitator style and student achievement: a study of schools in the middle. PhD Thesis, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
55.
SultanaN (2015) Application of concerned based adoption model (CBAM) for launching the information technology based teacher education programme at AIOU. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities4(3):153–166.
56.
TanSC (2010) School technology leadership: lessons from empirical research. In: SteelCHKeppellMJGerbicPHousegoS (eds) Curriculium, Technology and Transformationfor an Unkonw Future. Sydney, Australia: Ascilite.
57.
ThomasJMBennisWG (1972) The Management of Change and Conflict. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.
58.
VermeulenMKreijnsKVan BuurenH, et al. (2017) The role of transformative leadership, ICT-infrastructure and learning climate in teachers’ use of digital learning materials during their classes. British Journal of Educational Technology48(6):1427–1440.
59.
YeeDL (2000) Images of school principals’ information and communications technology leadership. Technology, Pedagogy and Education9(3):287–302.
60.
Yuen HK, LawNWWongKC (2003) ICT implementation and school leadership: case studies of ICT integration in teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration41(2):158–170.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
