Quality education without central examinations: The case of Flanders

Amrein-Beardsley A Berliner DC Rideau S (2010) Cheating in the first, second, and third degree: educators’ responses to high-stakes testing. Educational Policy Analysis Archives 18(14):1–36.

Au W (2007) High-stakes testing and curricular control: a qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher 36(5):258–267.

Beaver JK Weinbaum EH (2015) State test data and school improvement efforts. Educational Policy 29(3):478–503.

Carnoy M Loeb S (2002) Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24(4):305–331.

Cobb F Russell NM (2014) Meritocracy or complexity: problematizing racial disparities in mathematics assessment within the context of curricular structures, practices, and discourse. Journal of Education Policy 30(5):631–649.

Gipps C Stobart G (2009) Fairness in assessment. In: Wyatt-Smith C Cumming JJ (eds) Educational Assessment in the 21st Century: Connecting Theory and Practice. London: Springer, pp. 105–118.

Jürges H Schneider K (2010) Central exit examinations increase performance but take the fun out of mathematics. Journal of Population Economics 23:497–517.

Jürges H Richter WF Schneider K (2005) Teacher quality and incentives: theoretical and empirical effects of standards on teacher quality. FinanzArchiv / Public Finance Analysis 61:298–326.

Klein ED Van Ackeren I (2012) Challenges and problems for research in the field of statewide exams. A stock taking of differing procedures and standardization levels. Studies in Educational Evaluation 37:180–188.

Klenowski V (2014) Towards fairer assessment. Australian Education Research 41:445–470.

Neumann M Trautwein U Nagy G (2011) Do central examinations lead to greater grading comparability? A study of frame-of-reference effects on the university entrance qualification in Germany. Studies in Educational Evaluation 37(4):206–217.

OECD (2013) Synergies for Better Learning. An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2018) Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD.

Penninckx M Vanhoof J Quintelier A , et al. (2016) Scenario’s Voor Leer(Winst)Monitoring in Vlaanderen: Een Ontwerponderzoek Naar Haalbaarheid En Wenselijkheid. OBPWO 13.03. Brussel: Vlaams Ministerie voor Onderwijs en Vorming.

Schildkamp K Rekers-Mombarg L Harms TJ (2012) Student group differences in examination results and utilization for policy and school development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23(2):229–255.

Shewbridge C Hulshof M Nusche D , et al. (2011) School evaluation in the Flemish community of Belgium. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Paris: OECD.

Smagorinsky P Lakly A Johnson TS (2002) Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education 34(3):187–213.

Van Ackeren I Block R Klein ED , et al. (2012) The impact of statewide exit exams: a descriptive case study of three German states with differing low stakes exam regimes. Education Policy Analysis Archives 20(8):1–32.

Vanlommel K Van Gasse R Vanhoof J , et al. (2017) Teachers’ decision-making: data based or intuition driven? International Journal of Educational Research 83:75–83.

Vogler KE (2006) Impact of a high school graduation examination on Tennessee science teachers’ instructional practices. American Secondary Education 35(1):33–57.

Wang L Beckett GH Brown L (2006) Controversies of standardized assessment in school accountability reform: a critical synthesis of multidisciplinary research evidence. Applied Measurement in Education 19(4):305–328.

Wiliam D (2010) Standardized testing and school accountability. Educational Psychologist 45(2):107–122.

Wössmann L (2005) The effect heterogeneity of central examinations: evidence from TIMSS, TIMSS-Repeat and PISA. Education Economics 13(2):143–169.