This article suggests that the implementation of human resource policies such as teacher performance appraisal (TPA) is a disturbance to the school organizational climate. Based on my cross-examination of both school managers’ and teachers’ discourse, I suggest that a new leadership approach needs to be developed at the school level to effectively coordinate TPA implementation in such a way that it can enhance teacher professional growth.
AlfesKShantzDTrussCSoaneC (2013) The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: A moderated mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management24(2):330–351.
2.
AndersenJ (2010) Public versus private managers: How public and private managers differ in leadership behavior. Public Administration Review70(1):131–141.
3.
ArmstrongMTaylorS (2014) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Philadelphia: Kogan.
BarlevyGNealD (2012) Pay for percentile. American Economic Review102(5):1805–1831.
6.
BrinsfieldC (2014) Employee voice and silence in organizational behavior. In: WilkinsonADonagheyJDundonTFreemanR (eds) Handbook of Research on Employee Voice. Northampton: Edward Edgar, 114–134.
7.
CasavantCCollinsWFaginski-StarkEMcCandlessJTenczaM (2012) Perceptions of the principal evaluation process and performance criteria: A qualitative study of the challenge of principal evaluation. Boston: Boston College.
8.
CooksonP (2013) Class Rules: Exposing Inequality in American High Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
9.
DoriathBMontaiguRPonceletYRichonHG (2013) L’evaluation des enseignants. Inspection Generale de l’Education Nationale. Paris, France.
10.
EpsteinJ (1985) A question of merit: Principals’ and parents’ evaluations of teachers. Educational Researcher14(7):3–10.
11.
GittellJSeidnerRWimbushJ (2010) A relational model of how high-performance work systems work. Organization Science21(2):490–506.
12.
HanushekE (2011) The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economic of Education Review30(3):466–479.
13.
HargreavesA (1994) Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teachers’ Work and Culture in the Postmodern Age. New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
HerzbergFI (1966) Work and the Nature of Man. Oxford: World Publishing Company.
15.
HoodC (1995) The new public management in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting Organizations and Society20(2):93–109.
16.
HuselidM (1995) The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal38(3):635–672.
17.
IvancevichJKonopaskeRMattesonM (2014) Organizational Behavior and Management. New York: McGraw Hill.
18.
JohnsonSMPapayJPFiarmanSEMungerMSQazilbashEK (2010) Teacher to teacher: Realizing the potential of peer assistance and review. Washington: Center for American Progress.
19.
KehoeRWrightP (2013) The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management39(2):366–391.
20.
LarsenMA (2009) Stressful, hectic, daunting: A critical policy study of the Ontario teacher performance appraisal system. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy95:1–44.
21.
McCaffreyDFSassTRLockwoodJRMihalyK (2009) The intertemporal variability of teacher effect estimates. Education Finance and Policy4:572–606.
22.
MaharajS (2014) Administrators’ views on teacher evaluation: Examining Ontario’s teacher performance appraisal. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy152:1–58.
23.
MarksEPintyS (2003) Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Education Administration Quarterly39(3):370–397.
24.
MedleyDCokerH (1987) The accuracy of principals’ judgments of teacher performance. The Journal of Educational Research80(4):242–247.
MenueyB (2005) Teachers’ perceptions of professional incompetence and barriers to the dismissal process. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education18(4):309–325.
27.
MinguyC (1978) Évaluation du personnel enseignant dans les écoles élémentaires et les écoles secondaires du Quebec. Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Québec.
28.
MoneELondonM (2014) Employee Engagement Through Effective Performance Management: A Practical Guide for Managers. New York: Routledge.
29.
MurphyR (2013) Testing teachers: What works best for teacher evaluation and appraisal. The Sutton Trust, London.
30.
NormoreAH (2004) Performance appraisals of school administrators in one Canadian school district: A contemporary model. Alberta Journal of Educational Research50(3):283–298.
PapayJP (2012) Refocusing the debate: Assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard Educational Review82(1):123–141.
33.
PapayJPJohnsonSM (2012) Is PAR a good investment? Understanding the costs and benefits of teacher peer assistance and review programs. Educational Policy26(5):696–729.
34.
PhillipsJPhillipsP (2016) Handbook of Training and Measurement Evaluation. New York: Routledge.
35.
PowerMLaughlinR (1992) Critical theory and accounting. In: AlvessonMWillmottH (eds) Critical Management Studies. London: SAGE, 113–135.
36.
RichardMMichaudP (1982) La pratique de l’évaluation des enseignants au Nouveau-Brunswick, au Québec et Ontario. Revue des Sciences de l’Education8(2):255–270.
37.
RossJBruceC (2007) Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education23(2):146–159.
38.
RothsteinJ (2010) Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics125(1):175–214.
39.
ShanahanT (2010) Teacher merit pay: A literature review. Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association, Toronto.
40.
StanleyA (2003) Next Generation Leader. New York: Multnomah.
41.
SteinbergMGarrettR (2016) Classroom composition and measured teacher performance: What do teacher observation scores really measure?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis38(2):293–317.
42.
VakolaMBouradasD (2005) Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: An empirical investigation. Employee Relations27(5):441–458.
43.
WeinerLJeromeD (2014) Urban Teaching: The Essentials. New York: Teachers College Press.
44.
WeisbergD, SextonS, MulhernJ and KeelingD (2009) The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. The New Teacher Project, Brooklyn.
