Theory of action accounts of problem-solving: How a Japanese school communicates student incidents to parents

Abstract

The importance of trust in institutions in Japan is a common theme that emerges from literature on Japanese institutions. This article presents a problem-based methodology investigation into a Japanese educational institution, and how a Japanese educational leader deals with student incidents. A theory of action detailing strategies chosen in that institution for communicating student incidents to parents, a set of constraints that explains how those strategies came to be chosen, and the likely consequences of those strategies is described. Our analysis reveals that the goal of maintaining relationships and avoiding conflict with parents in order to maintain trust in the institution drive decisions about how to communicate with parents about student incidents. However, we conclude that the chosen strategies are unlikely to achieve the desired ends. We conclude by proposing an alternative theory of action that is more likely to achieve the stated aims of the school leader.

Keywords

interpersonal communication Japanese educational leadership organizational learning problem-based methodology theories of action

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ando

Asakura

Simons-Morton

(2005) Psychosocial influences on physical, verbal, and indirect bullying among Japanese early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence 25(3):268–297.

Argyris

(1993) Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Argyris

(1996) Actionable knowledge: Design causality in the service of consequential theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 32(4):390–406.

Argyris

(2000) Flawed Advice and the Management Trap: How Managers Can Know When They’re Getting Good Advice and When They’re Not. New York: Oxford University Press.

Argyris

Schön

(1974) Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Argyris

Schön

(1996) Organisational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Bjork

(2000) Responsibility for improving the quality of teaching in Japanese schools: The role of the principal in professional development efforts. Education and Society 18(3):21–43.

Chang

(2009) An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review 21(3):193–218.

Chikudate

(2002) Collective myopia and disciplinary power behind the scenes of unethical practices: A diagnostic theory on Japanese organisation. Journal of Management Studies 39:289–307.

10.

Furlong

(2008) The Japanese hikikomori phenomenon: Acute social withdrawal among young people. The Sociological Review 56(2):309–325.

11.

Hattori

(2006) Social withdrawal in Japanese youth: A case study of thirty-five hikikomori clients. Journal of Trauma Practice 4(3–4):181–201.

12.

Kudomi

(1999) Teachers facing the confusion and conflicts in today’s Japan. Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies 31(2):69–83.

13.

Kurokawa

Ishibashi

Oshima

. (2012) Chapter 5: Organisational issues of the Parties involved in the accident. The National Diet of Japan: Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. Japan: The National Diet of Japan. Available at: http://wayback.archive-it.org/2438/20121020010756/http://naiic.go.jp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/NAIIC_Eng_Chapter5_web.pdf (accessed 13 December 2015).

14.

Morita

(1996) Bullying as a contemporary behavior problem in the context of increasing ‘societal privatization’ in Japan. Prospects 26(2):311–329.

15.

Nickles

(1981) What is a problem that we may solve it? Synthese 47(1):85–118.

16.

OECD (2011) Lessons from PISA for the United States. Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en (accessed 13 December 2015).

17.

OECD (2016) PISA 2015 results in focus. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf (accessed 06 January 2017).

18.

Okano

Tsuchiya

(1999) Education in Contemporary Japan: Inequality and Diversity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Robinson

(1993) Problem-Based Methodology: Research for the Improvement of Practice. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

20.

Robinson

Lai

(1999) The explanation of practice: Why Chinese students copy assignments. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 12(2):193–210.

21.

Saito

Sato

(2012) Lesson study as an instrument for school reform. Management in Education 26(4):181–186.

22.

Tajan

(2015) Japanese post-modern social renouncers: An exploratory study of the narratives of Hikikomori subjects. Subjectivity 8(3):283–304.

23.

Treml

(2001) Bullying as a social malady in contemporary Japan. International Social Work 44(1):107–117.

24.

Willis

Bartell

(1990) Japanese and American principals: A comparison of excellence in educational leadership. Comparative Education 26(1):107–123.

25.

Yoneyama

(2012) The Japanese High School: Silence and Resistance. New York: Routledge.

26.

Yoneyama

Naito

(2003) Problems with the paradigm: The school as a factor in understanding bullying (with special reference to Japan). British Journal of Sociology of Education 24(3):315–330.