The article aims to find predictors of study success from a teacher’s perspective that relate to the built environment. The research is based on a national online survey among 1752 teachers at 18 Dutch Universities of Applied Sciences. Multivariate data analyses were used to test the hypothesis that the quality of spatial and functional aspects at educational institutions is positively related to study success. The results show there is a statistically significant positive relationship between the perceived quality of cleanliness, classrooms, classroom conditions, front office and ICT with study success. Closed environments like offices and meeting rooms, but foremost the size of the education institution, relate negatively to study success. Based on the research findings it is clear that a prime consideration in educational built environment design is to facilitate social interaction, and to create meaningful, clean, self-contained and small-scale physical settings for users within large institutions.
BarkerRGGumpPV (1964) Big School, Small School: High School Size and Student Behaviour. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
BarretPSBaldryD (2003) Facilities Management: Towards Best Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
6.
BeckerF (2002) Organisational dilemmas and workplace solutions. Journal of Corporate Real Estate4(2): 129–149.
7.
BitnerMJ (1992) Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing56(2): 57–71.
8.
BlackmoreJBatemanDLoughlinJO’MaraJArandaG (2011) Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes. Centre for Research in Educational Futures and Innovation, Deakin University, East Melbourne.
9.
BonaiutoMBonnesMContinisioM (2004) Neighborhood evaluation within a multiplace perspective on urban activities. Environment and Behavior36(1): 41–69.
BoschSF (2006) Research priorities: How facilities affect learning outcomes. In: TannerCKLackneyJA (eds) Educational Facilities Planning: Leadership, Architecture, and Management. Boston: Pearson Education, 323–349.
12.
BowmanCAmbrosiniV (2000) Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management11: 1–15.
13.
BridgeRG (1979) The Determinants of Educational Outcomes: The Impact of Families, Peers, Teachers, and Schools. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company.
14.
CadotteERTurgeonN (1988) Dissatisfiers and satisfiers: Suggestions from consumer complaints and compliments. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior1: 74–79.
15.
CariniRMKuhGDKleinSP (2006) Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education47(1): 1–32.
16.
ChevalierALanotG (2002) The relative effect of family characteristics and financial situation on educational achievement. Education Economics10(2): 165–181.
17.
ClarkH (2002) Building education: The role of the physical environment in enhancing teaching and research. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
18.
Comité Européen de Normalisation (2006) EN 15221-1: European Standard in Facility Management – Part 1: Terms and Definitions. Brussels: CEN.
19.
CooperI (1985) Teachers’ assessment of primary school buildings: The role of the physical environment in education. British Educational Research Journal11(3): 253–269.
20.
CottonK (1996) School size, school climate, and student performance. School Improvement Research Series. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
21.
DuffyF (2000) Design and facilities management in a time of change. Facilities18(10/11/12): 371–375.
22.
DunnRHonigsfeldA.Shea DoolanLJ. (2009) Impact of learning-style instructional strategies on students' achievement and attitudes: Perceptions of educators in diverse institutions. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas82(3): 135–140.
23.
EarthmanGI (2002) School facility conditions and student academic achievement. Williams Watch Series: Investigating the Claims of Williams v. State of California. UCLA's Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access. Los Angeles: UCLA.
24.
EarthmanGILemastersLK (2009) Teacher attitudes about classroom conditions. Journal of Educational Administration47(3): 323–335.
25.
FieldA (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE.
26.
FraserBJFisherDL (1982) Predicting students’ outcomes from their perceptions of classroom psychosocial environment. American Educational Research Journal19(4): 498–518.
27.
FridaySCottsDG (1995) Quality Facility Management. New York: Wiley.
28.
GibbonsS (2002) Neighbourhood effects on educational achievement: Evidence from the Census and National Child Development Study. London: Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics and Political Science.
29.
GreenwaldRHedgesLV (1996) The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research66(3): 361–396.
30.
HerzbergFMausnerBSnydermanBB (1959) The Motivation to Work. New York: Wiley.
31.
HorsburghCRJr (1995) Healing by design. The New England Journal of Medicine333: 735–740.
32.
HutchinsonL (2003) Educational environment. British Medical Journal326: 810–812.
33.
JansenEPWA (1996) Curriculumorganisatie en studievoortgang [Curriculum organisation and study progress]. PhD diss., University of Groningen.
34.
JeynesWH (2002) Educational policy and the effects of attending a religious school on the academic achievement of children. Educational Policy16(3): 406–424.
35.
Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) (2006) Design spaces for effective learning: A guide to 21st century learning space design. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), University of Bristol.
36.
KaoGThompsonJS (2003) Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology29: 417–442.
37.
KokHBMobachMPOmtaSWF (2011) The added value of facility management in the educational environment. Journal of Facilities Management9(4): 249–265.
38.
KumarRO’MalleyPMJohnstonLD (2008) Association between physical environment of secondary schools and student problem behaviour: A national study, 2000–2003. Environment and Behavior40(4): 455–486.
39.
KuntzAM (2012) Reconsidering the workplace: Faculty perceptions of their work and working environments. Studies in Higher Education37(7): 769–782.
LeeVESmithJB (1993) The organisation of effective schools. In: Darling-HammondL (ed.) Review of Research in Education, Vol. 19. Washington, DC: American Education Research Association, 171–267.
42.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2009) A review of empirical evidence of school size effects: A policy perspective. Review of Educational Research79(1): 464–490.
43.
LeithwoodKDartBJantziDSteinbachR (1993) Building commitment for change and fostering organizational learning. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Education.
44.
LizzioAWilsonKSimonsR (2002) University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education27(1): 27–52.
45.
McKenzieKSchweitzerR (2001) Who succeeds at university? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students. Higher Education Research & Development20(1): 21–33.
46.
MarksHMPrintySM (2003) Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly39(3): 370–397.
47.
MendellMJHeathGA (2005) Do indoor pollutants and thermal conditions in schools influence student performance? A critical review of the literature. Indoor Air15(1): 27–52.
48.
MensahFKKiernanKE (2010) Gender differences in educational attainment: Influences of the family environment. British Educational Research Journal36(2): 239–260.
49.
MunroBH (1981) Dropouts from higher education: Path analysis of a national sample. American Educational Research Journal1(2): 133–141.
OpdenakkerM-CVan DammeJ (2007) Do school context, student composition and school leadership affect school practice and outcomes in secondary education?British Educational Research Journal33(2): 179–206.
52.
ParkJHChoiHJ (2009) Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society12(4): 11.
53.
PughmGTelhajS (2008) Faith schools, social capital and academic attainment: Evidence from TIMSS-R mathematics scores in Flemish secondary schools. British Educational Research Journal34(2): 235–267.
54.
RapoportA (1982) The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
55.
RasilaHMRothePNenonenS (2009) Workplace experience – a journey through a business park. Facilities27(13/14): 486–496.
56.
ReynoldsAJWalbergHJ (1991) A structural model of science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology83(1): 97–107.
57.
RientiesBBeausaertSGrohertTNiemantsverdrietSKrommersP (2012) Understanding academic performance of international students: The role of ethnicity, academic and social integration. Higher Education63(6): 685–700.
58.
RobertsLW (2009) Measuring school facility conditions: An illustration of the importance of purpose. Journal of Educational Administration47(3): 368–380.
SchneiderM (2002) Do School Facilities Affect Academic Outcomes?Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
61.
SilinsHCMulfordB (2002) Schools as learning organisations: The case for system, teacher and student learning. Journal of Educational Administration40(5): 425–446.
62.
TempleP (2007) Learning spaces for the 21st century: A review of the literature. York: Higher Education Academy.
63.
ThompsonJD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
64.
TintoV (1975) Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research45(1): 89–125.
65.
TrigwellKEllisRAHanF (2012) Relations between students’ approaches to learning, experienced emotions and outcomes of learning. Studies in Higher Education37(7): 811–824.
66.
UlineCTschannen-MoranM (2008) The walls speak: The interplay of quality facilities, school climate and student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration46(1): 55–73.
67.
Van Note ChismN (2002) A tale of two classrooms. New Directions for Teaching and Learning92: 5–12.
68.
VargoSLLuschRF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic to marketing. Journal of Marketing68(1): 1–17.
69.
WasleyPMFineMGladdenNE. (2000) Small schools: Great strides – A study of new small schools in Chicago. New York: Bank Street College of Education.
70.
WenglinskyH (1997) How money matters: The effect of school district spending on academic achievement. Sociology of Education70(3): 221–237.
71.
WoodruffRB (1997) Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science25(2): 139–153.
72.
WöβmannL (2003) Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics65(2): 117–170.
