Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article starts from the recognition that senior staff contribute to the operation of further education college governance through working time, professional insight and public performance. The theoretical underpinning for the article draws upon social identity theory, governance accountability and the psychological contract for senior staff as employees of the governing body. The article reports the findings from a research study seeking to gain a greater understanding of the ways in which senior staff contribute to further education college governance and their perceptions of their role and performance in relation to college governance. 102 senior staff responded to a questionnaire, and three case examples of further education colleges in England were involved in this study. The article concludes with three recommendations to college governing bodies as to how they might improve senior staff contributions to effective governing of colleges.

Keywords

further education college leadership governing bodies psychological contract senior staff social identity theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Association of Colleges (2011) Foundation Code of F.E. Governance. London: AoC.

Association of Colleges (2013) www.aoc.co.uk.

BIS (2011) New Challenges, New Chances: Next Steps in Implementing the Further Education Reform Programme London. London: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills.

Code Steering Group (2010) Good Governance: A Code for the Voluntary and Community Sector. London: ACEVO and partners.

Coffee

(2006) Gatekeepers: The Professions and Corporate Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Conway

Briner

(2004) Role of the psychological contract. Presentation to the 2004 CIPD Annual Psychology at Work Conference.

Cowton

(2008) Governing the corporate citizen: Reflections on the role of professionals. In: Luetge

Conill

Schoenwaelder-Kuntze

(eds) Corporate Citizenship, Contractarianism and Ethical Theory: On Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Haslam

Reicher

Platow

(2011) The New Psychology of Leadership. Hove: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis).

Hill

(2007) The role and performance of college governing bodies in relation to the employment of principals of further education colleges. In: Collinson

(ed.) Researching in the Learning and Skills Sector: By the Sector, On the Sector, For the Sector. Lancaster: Centre for Excellence in Leadership.

10.

Lorsch

(1995) Empowering the Board. Harvard Business Review 73(1): 107–117.

11.

Lorsch

MacIver

(1989) Pawns or potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards. Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston, MA.

12.

Mace

(1971) Directors: Myth and reality. Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston, MA.

13.

Matthews

Snell

Chapman

(2011) Case Studies in Governance Arrangements in the Further Education Sector. Coventry: LSIS.

14.

Ofsted (March 2013) Local Accountability and Autonomy in Colleges. London: Ofsted.

15.

Roberts

McNulty

Stiles

(2005) Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management 16: 5–26.

16.

Rousseau

(1995) Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

17.

van der Walt

Ingley

(2000) Evaluating board effectiveness: The changing context of strategic governance. Journal of Change Management 1(4): 313–331.

18.

Western

(2008) Leadership: A Critical Text. London: SAGE.

Appreciating the contribution of senior managers to further education college governance in England

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References