This article explores how leadership can help to enable student voice to occur in schools. We find that the relationship between teachers and the school leader is a critical context for enabling voice. Specifically, we find that the following concepts were important for efforts to enable and foster student voice: (1) clear vision of school that is incorporated deeply into practice as ‘the way we do things here’; (2) allowing opt-in strategies for teachers when possible; (3) recognizing that implementation across classrooms and personnel will vary depending on individual contexts, beliefs, and experiences.
CaminoL. (2005) ‘Pitfalls and promising practices of youth-adult partnerships: An evaluator’s reflections’. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 75−85.
2.
CervoneB. (2002, May) Taking Democracy in Hand: Youth action for educational change in the San Francisco Bay area. Providence, RI: What Kids Can Do and The Forum for Youth Investment.
3.
ColatosA. M.MorrellE. (2003) ‘Apprenticing urban youth as critical researchers: Implications for increasing equity and access in diverse urban schools’. In RubinB.SilvaE. (eds) Critical Voices in School Reform: Students living through change (pp.113−31). London: Routledge Falmer.
4.
Cook-SatherA. (2002) ‘Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education’. Educational Researcher, 31(4): 3−14.
5.
Della PortaD.DianiM. (1999) Social Movements: An Introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
6.
EcclesJ.GootmanJ. A. (2002) Community Programs to Promote Youth Development. Committee on Community-Level Programs for Youth. Washington, DC: Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences Education, National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. National Academies of Science.
7.
FieldingM. (2001) ‘Students as radical agents of change’. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2): 123−41.
8.
FieldingM. (2004) ‘Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities’. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2): 295−311.
9.
FlanaganC. A.FaisonN. (2001) ‘Youth civic development: Implications of research for social policy and programs’. Social Policy Report, 15(1).
10.
GinwrightS. A. (2005) ‘On urban ground: Understanding African-American intergenerational partnerships in urban communities’. Journal of Community Psychology, 33: 101−10.
11.
HartR. (1992) ‘Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship’. UNICEF Innocenti Essays, Vol. 4.
12.
KirshnerB.O’DonoghueJ.McLaughlinM. W. (2005) Youth-adult research collaborations: Bringing youth voice to the research process’. In MahoneyJ. L.LarsonR. W.EcclesJ. S. (eds) Organized Activities as Contexts of Development: Extracurricular activities, after-school, and community programs (pp.131−56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
KirshnerB. (2008) Guided participation in three youth activism organizations: Facilitation, apprenticeship, and joint work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1): 60−101.
14.
LeonardP.LeonardL. (2001) ‘Assessing aspects of professional collaboration in schools: Beliefs versus practices’. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 47(1): 4−23.
15.
McQuillanP. J. (2005) ‘Possibilities and pitfalls: A comparative analysis of student empowerment’. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4): 639−70. doi: 10. 3102/00028312042004639.
16.
MitraD. L. (2004) ‘The significance of students: can increasing “student voice”, in schools lead to gains in youth development’. Teachers College Record, 106(4): 651−688.
17.
MitraD. L. (2005) ‘Adults advising youth: Leading while getting out of the way’. Education Administration Quarterly, 41(3): 520−53.
18.
OakesJ.LiptonM. (2002) Teaching to Change the World. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Ochoa-BeckerA. S.MortonM. L.AutryM. M.JohnstadS.MerrillD. (2001) ‘A search for decision making in three elementary classrooms’. Theory and Research in Social Education, 261−89.
20.
RudduckJ. (2007) ‘Student voice, student engagement, and school reform’. In ThiessenD.Cook-SatherA. (eds) International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary Schools, pp.587−610. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
21.
SergiovanniT.StarrattR. (1998) Supervision: A redefinition, 6th edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
22.
SerriereS.C.MitraD.L.CodyJ. (2010) ‘Youth citizens taking action: Better school lunches, and more’. Social Studies and the Learner, November.
23.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1994) ‘Grounded theory methodology: An overview’. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds) The Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp.273−84. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
ZeldinS. (2004) ‘Youth as agents of adult and community development: Mapping the processes and outcomes of youth engaged in organizational governance’. Applied Developmental Science, 8: 75−90.
