Bennett (1999) ` One Drop of Blood: teacher appraisal Mark 2' Teacher Development , 3 (3), pp. 411-428.
2.
Boyd, E., Altbach, P. and Whitelaw, M. (1994) The Academic Profession: an international perspective , New Jersey, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
3.
Campbell, A. (2002) Implementing Appraisal: a case study of the implementation of an appraisal system, Unpublished Ed.D. thesis, The Open University.
4.
Cullen, K. (1997) `Headteacher appraisal: a view from the inside' , Research Papers in Education, 12 (2), pp. 177-204.
5.
Currie, Jan,and Vidovich,L. (2000) ` Privatizationand competition policies for Australian universities', International Journal of Educational Development20 (2000), pp. 135-151.
6.
D'Apollonia, S. and Abrami, P.C. (1997) `Navigating students' rating of instruction', American Psychologist, 52, pp. 1198-1208.
7.
Deem. R. (2000) `New Managerialism' and the Management of UK Universities, End of Award Report of the Findings of an ESRC Funded Project, Department of Education Research and the Management School, Lancaster University .
8.
Elliott, J. (1983) Teacher Evaluation and Teaching as a Moral Science , Cambridge Institution of Education (mimeo).
9.
Elliott, G. and Crossley, M. (1997) `Contested values in further education', Educational Management and Administration, 25 (1), pp.79-92.
10.
Fiddler B. and Cooper, R. (eds.) (1992) Staff Appraisal and Staff Management in Schools and Colleges: a guide to implementation, Harlow , Longman.
11.
Fitzgerald, T. (2001) `Potential paradoxes in performance appraisal: emerging issues for New Zealand schools', in Middlewood, D. and Cardo, C. (eds.) Managing Teacher Appraisal and Performance: A comparative approach , London: Routledge Falmer
12.
Grace, G. (1985) `Judging teachers: the social and political contexts of teacher evaluation', British Journal of Sociology of Education , 6 (1), pp.3-16.
13.
Greenwald, A.G. and Gillmore, G.M. (1997) `Grading leniency is a removablecontaminantofstudentratings ', American Psychologist, 52, pp. 1209-1217.
14.
Hutchinson, B. (1997) `Appraising appraisal: some tensions and some possibilities ', in Kydd, L., Crawford, M. and Riches, C. (eds.) Professional Developmentfor Educational Management, Buckingham, Open University Press.
15.
Ko, E. (2001) Performance Appraisal in Higher Education: the impact of new managerialism on the motivation of academic staff, University of Bristol, unpublished Ed.D. thesis.
16.
Kyriacou, C. (1995) `An evaluation of teacher appraisal in schoolswithinoneLocalEducationAuthority' , School Organisation, 15 (2), pp. 109-116.
17.
Magennis, S. (1993) `Appraisal systems and their contribution to quality in teaching', in Ellis, R. (ed.) Quality Assurance in University Teaching, Buckingham , The Open University Press.
18.
Marsh,H.W.andRoche,L.A.( 1997)`Makingstudents' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: the critical issues of validity, bias, and utility', American Psychologist, 52, pp. 1187-1197.
19.
Middlewood, D. (2001) `Managing teacher appraisal and performance in the united Kingdom: pendulum swings', in Middlewood, D. and Cardno, C. (eds.) Managing Teacher Appraisal and Performance: A comparative approach , London: RoutledgeFalmer.
20.
Mortimore, P. and Mortimore, J. (1991) `Teacher appraisal: back to the future', School Organisation, 11 (2), pp. 125-143.
21.
Peaker, G. (1986) `Teacher management and appraisal in two school systems in the southern USA', Journal of Education for Teaching , 12 (1), pp. 77-83.
22.
Poster, C. and Poster, D. (1997) `The nature of appraisal', in Kydd, L., Crawford, M. and Riches, C. (eds.) Professional Development for Educational Management, Buckingham, Open University Press.
23.
Powney,J.( 1991) ` Theappraisal of teachersin middle management roles', Research Papers in Education, 6 (3), pp.171-195.
24.
Randle, K. and Brady, N. (1997a) `Further Education and the new managerialism', The Journal of Further and Higher Education, 21 (2), pp. 229-239.
25.
Randle, K. and Brady, N. (1997b) `Managerialismand professionalism in the `Cinderella Service'', Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 29 (1), pp. 121—139.
26.
Simons, H. and Elliott, J. (eds.) (1989) Rethinking Appraisal and Assessment , Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
27.
Troman, G. (1996) `Models of the `good' teacher: defining and redefining teacher quality' in Woods, P. (ed.) Contemporary Issues in Teaching and Learning, Buckingham , The Open University.
28.
Trow, M. (1994) `Managerialism and the academic profession: the case of England', Higher Education Policy, 17 (2), pp. 11-18.
29.
Turner, G., and Clift, P. (1988) Studies in Teacher Appraisal, Lewes, The Falmer Press
30.
Walsh, K. (1988) `Appraising the teachers: professionalism and control' , in Dale R, et al. (eds.) Frameworks for Teaching, Milton Keynes, The Open University Press.
31.
Wilson, R. (1998) `New research casts doubt on value of student evaluations of professors' The Chronicle of Higher Education, January16,1998,accessedon-lineat http://chronicle.com/data/articles.dir/art-44.dir/issue-19.dir/19a01201.htm
