The first part of this series in the last edition of MiE told the fictionalised story of an Ofsted inspection. This current article provides insight into the method of fictionalised story writing used by the author. A concluding article to be published in the next issue of MIE will offer a review of the literature on Ofsted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, T. & Claxton, G. (2000) The Intuitive Practitioner, Open University.
2.
Clandinin, J. & Connelly, M. (1995) Teachers' Professional Knowledge Landscapes, Teachers' College Press.
3.
Connelly, M. & Clandinin, J. (1999) Shaping a Professional Identity: Stories of Educational Practice,Teachers' College Press.
4.
Cullingford, C. (1999) (ed) An Inspector Calls: Ofsted and its effect on school standards, Kogan Page.
5.
Day, C. et al (2000) Leading Schools in Times of Change, Open University.
6.
Evans, M. & Lomax, P.Working in partnership to implement teacher research, in P. Lomax (ed) Quality Management in Education , Routledge, ch9: 137-149.
7.
Lomax, P. (2000) Coming to a better understanding of educative relations through learning from individuals' representations of their action research , Reflective Practice, Volume 1, Number 1, 2000 pp43-55.
8.
Macbeath, J. (1999) Schools Must Speak for Themselves: The case for school self-evaluation.
9.
Ofsted (1995) Guidance on the Inspection of Nursery & Primary Schools, HMSO.
10.
Ofsted (2000) Handbook for Inspecting Primary and Nursery Schools with Guidance on Self-Evaluation , HMSO.
11.
Tomlinson, H., Gunter, H. & Smith, P. (ed) ( 1999) Living Headships: Voices, Values and Vision, Paul Chapman.
