Mental Status Testing in the Elderly Nursing Home Population

Abstract

The clinical utility of selected brief cognitive screening instruments in detecting dementia in an elderly nursing home population was examined. One hundred twenty nursing home residents (mean age 87.9) were administered the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS). The majority of the subjects (75%) were also administered the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS). Both clinically diagnosed demented (n=57) and non-demented (n=63) subjects participated in the study. Dementia was diagnosed in accordance with DSM-III-R criteria by physicians specializing in geriatric medicine. Using standard cutoffs for impairment, the 3MS, MMSE, and DRS achieved high sensitivity (82% to 100%) but low specificity (33% to 52%) in the detection of dementia among nursing home residents. Positive predictive values ranged from 52% to 61%, and negative predictive values from 77% to 100%. Higher age, lower education, and history of depression were significantly associated with misclassification of non-demented elderly subjects. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses revealed optimal classification of dementia with cutoff values of 74 for the 3MS, 22 for the MMSE, and 110 for the DRS. The results suggest that the 3MS, MMSE, and DRS do not differ significantly with respect to classification accuracy of dementia in a nursing home population. Elderly individuals of advanced age (i.e., the oldest-old) with lower education and a history of depression appear at particular risk for dementia misclassification with these instruments. Revised cutoff values for impairment should be employed when these instruments are applied to elderly residents of nursing homes and the oldest-old.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Anthony JC , LeResche L , Niaz U , et al. Limits of the ‘Mini-Mental State’ as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patients. Psychol Med 1982; 12:397–408.

2. Dick JPR , Guiloff RJ , Stewart A , et al. Mini-Mental State Examination in neurological patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47:496–499.

3. Nadler JD , Richardson ED , Malloy PF . Detection of impairment with the MMS. Neuropsych Neuropsychol Behau Neurol 1994; 7:109–113.

4. Naugle RI , Kawczak, K. Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Cleve Clin J Med 1989; 56:277–281.

5. Nelson A , Fogel BS , Faust D. Bedside cognitive screening instruments: a critical assessment. J Nerv Ment Dis 1986; 174:73–83.

6. Schwamm LH , van Dyke C , Kiernan RJ , et al. The Neuro-behavioral Cognitive Status Examination: comparison with the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination in a neurosurgical population. Ann Intern Med 1987; 107:486–491.

7. Folstein MF , Folstein SE , McHugh PR . “Mini-Mental State” A practical method for grading cognitive state of patients for the clinicians. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12:189–198.

8. Benedict RHB , Brandt J. Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination for the detection of amnesia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1992; 5:233–237.

9. Faustman WO , Moses JA , Csernansky JG . Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination in predicting neuropsychological functioning in a psychiatric sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1990; 81:126–131.

10.

10. Feher EP , Mahurin RK , Doody RS , et al. Establishing the limits of the Mini-Mental State. Arch Neurol 1992; 49:87–92.

11.

11. Lamarre CJ , Patten SB . Evaluation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination in a general psychiatric population. Can J Psychiatry 1991; 36:507–511.

12.

12. Grace J, Nadler JD, White DA, et al. Folstein versus Modified Mini-Mental State Exam in geriatric stroke: stability, validity, and screening utility. Arch Neurol in press.

13.

13. Pfeffer RI , Kurosaki TT , Harrah CH , et al. A survey diagnostic tool for senile dementia. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 114:515–527.

14.

14. Teng EL , Chui HC . The Modified Mini-Mental State Exam. J Clin Psychiatry 1987; 48:314–318.

15.

15. Teng E , Chui HC , Gong A. Comparisons between the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and its modified version—the 3MS test. Psychogeriatrics: Biomedical and Social Advances. Tokyo: Excerpta Medica, 1990: 189–192.

16.

16. Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., 1988.

17.

17. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd Ed. Rev.. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.

18.

18. Metz CE, Herman B, Wang P, et al. LABROC1 program, 1993.

19.

19. Metz CE, Herman B, Shen J, et al. CLABROC program, 1993.

20.

20. O'Connor DW , Pollitt PA , Hyde JB , et al. The reliability and validity of the Mini-Mental State in a British Community Survey. J Psychiatr Res 1989; 23:87–96.

21.

21. Montgomery KM, Costa L. Neuropsychological test performance of a normal elderly sample. Paper presented at the International Neuropsychological Society meeting, Mexico City, 1983.

22.

22. Brayne C , Calloway P. The association of education and socioeconomic status with the Mini-Mental State Examination and the clinical diagnosis of dementia in elderly people. Age Ageing 1990; 19:91–96.

23.

23. Crum RM , Anthony JC , Bassett SS , Folstein MF . Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State by age and education level. JAMA 1993; 269:2386–2391.

24.

24. Uhlmann RF , Larson EB . Effect of education on the Mini-Mental State Examination as a screening test for dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39:876–680.

25.

25. Bleecker ML , Bolla-Wilson K , Kawas C , Agnew J. Age-specific norms for the Mini-Mental State Exam. Neurology 1988; 38: 1565.

26.

26. Caine E. The neuropsychology of depression: The pseudodementia syndrome. In: Grant I , Adams K , Eds. Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatry disorders. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986: 221–243.

27.

27. Sweet JJ , Newman P , Bell B. Significance of depression in clinical neuropsychological assessment. Clin Psychol Rev 1992; 12:21–45.