Abstract
Background
Accurate sleep assessment is key to promoting healthy aging, yet self-reported measures often diverge from actigraphy. The factors driving these discrepancies in older adults remain unclear.
Methods
This cross-sectional secondary analysis examined the prevalence and correlates of subjective-objective sleep discrepancies in 195 community-dwelling older adults (69.84 ± 6.83 years old, 78.97% women) without dementia using baseline data from two clinical trials. Time in bed (TIB), sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST), and sleep efficiency were collected via ≥3 days of actigraphy, sleep diaries, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Discrepancies were calculated as self-reported minus actigraphy values, using ±15 min (±15% for sleep efficiency) as thresholds. Validated scales assessed insomnia, sleepiness, pain, and depression. Computerized batteries assessed processing speed, attention, executive function, working memory, and episodic memory.
Results
Discrepancies greater than ±15 min (or ±15%) were prevalent: 88.50% for TST, 81.25% for TIB (PSQI), 45.71% for TIB (diary), 45.87% for SOL, and 42.20% for sleep efficiency. Adjusted multinomial logistic regression revealed that more severe insomnia symptoms were significantly associated with reduced odds of over-reporting sleep efficiency on the PSQI (OR = 0.82, 95% CI [0.72, 0.94]). Although no longer significant after correcting for multiple comparisons, better verbal episodic memory was associated with greater odds of over-reporting sleep efficiency (OR = 2.11, 95% CI [1.10, 4.07]) and lower odds of under-reporting diary-based TIB (OR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.13, 0.76]).
Conclusion
Cognitive function and insomnia are linked to sleep discrepancies and may affect perceived sleep quality, warranting careful interpretation of self-reported sleep in older adults.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
