This pilot study investigated the acceptability and usefulness of 4 weekly Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) education sessions (delivered face-to-face and online) for family carers of individuals diagnosed with behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). These sessions were adapted from the Family-directed Approach to Brain injury (FAB)-PBS program to the FTD population.
Methods
A pre-test post-test mixed-methods design was utilized. Primary outcome measures included a Carer Confidence questionnaire and post-intervention Feedback Questionnaire. Assessments were conducted prior to the 4-week education program, immediately following the final session and a 3 months follow-up.
Results
Ten family carers completed the 4 PBS education sessions and indicated that the program was helpful in providing behaviour support. No significant changes in confidence ratings were found before and following the education sessions. A majority of participants, however, reported positive changes to their approach in providing behaviour support, with key themes including ‘recognising the function of behaviour’, ‘changing their own behaviour’ and ‘promoting a calmer approach’.
Conclusions
The FAB-PBS education sessions demonstrate to be an acceptable approach to increasing the capability of family carers in providing behaviour support to individuals with FTD, which will need to be confirmed in a larger feasibility study.
Coyle-GilchristITSDickKMPattersonK, et al.Prevalence, characteristics, and survival of frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes. Neurology. 2016;86(18):1736-1743.
2.
BakkerCde VugtMEvan VlietD, et al.Predictors of the time to institutionalization in young- versus late-onset dementia: Results from the needs in young onset dementia (NeedYD) study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(14):248-253.
3.
DraperBWithallA. Younger-onset dementia. Intern Med J. 2016;46(7):779-786.
4.
ChappellNLDlittBHHollanderMJMillerJAMcWilliamC. Comparative costs of home care and residential care. Gerontol. 2004;44(3):389-400.
5.
PiguetOHornbergerMShelleyBPKippsCMHodgesJR. Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2009;72(8):732-737.
6.
GhoshADuttABhargavaPSnowdenJ. Environmental dependency behaviours in frontotemporal dementia: Have we been underrating them?J Neurol. 2013;260(3):861-868.
7.
MarczinskiCADavidsonWKerteszA. A longitudinal study of behavior in frontotemporal dementia and primary progressive aphasia. Cognit Behav Neurol. 2004;17(4):185-190.
8.
FisherAConnollyTO’ConnorCMKellyG. Positive behaviour support for people with dementia. Alzheimer's Dementia. Under Review.
9.
HaassCNeumannM. Frontotemporal dementia: From molecular mechanisms to therapy. J Neurochem. 2016;138(suppl 1):3-5.
10.
TsaiRMBoxerAL. Treatment of frontotemporal dementia. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2016;16(11):319-334.
11.
National Disability Insurance Scheme (Restrictive Practices and Behaviour Support) Rules 2018 (Austl.). 2018.
12.
PiguetOKumforFHodgesJ. Diagnosing, monitoring and managing behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Med J Aust. 2017;207(7):303-308.
13.
DyerSMHarrisonSLLaverKWhiteheadCCrottyM. An overview of systematic reviews of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018;30(3):295-309.
14.
MagierskiRSobowTSchwertnerEReligaD. Pharmacotherapy of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: State of the art and future progress. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:1168.
15.
AyalonL. Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions for the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with dementia. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(20):2182.
16.
VinickD. Dementia-friendly design: Hogeweyk and beyond. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(683):300-300.
17.
PoulosCJBayerABeaupreL, et al.A comprehensive approach to reablement in dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;3(3):450-458.
18.
O’ConnorCMClemsonLBrodatyH, et al.The tailored activity program (TAP) to address behavioral disturbances in frontotemporal dementia: A feasibility and pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(3):299-310.
LivingstonGBarberJRapaportP, et al.START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) study: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a manual-based coping strategy programme in promoting the mental health of carers of people with dementia. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(61):1-242.
21.
GitlinLNWinterLDennisMPHodgsonNHauckWW. Targeting and managing behavioral symptoms in individuals with dementia: A randomized trial of a nonpharmacological intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(8):1465-1474.
22.
LeblancLA. Integrating behavioral psychology services into adult day programming for individuals with dementia. Behav Modif. 2010;34(5):443-458.
FeeneyTJAchilichJ. Structured flexibility and context-sensitive behavioral support for the chronically cranky. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(4):709-723.
25.
HassiotisARobothamDCanagasabeyA, et al.Randomized, single-blind, controlled trial of a specialist behavior therapy team for challenging behavior in adults with intellectual disabilities. Am J Psychiatr. 2009;166(11):1278-1285.
26.
KincaidD. Staying true to our PBS roots in a changing world. J Posit Behav Interv. 2018;20(1):15-18.
27.
O'ConnorCMCMioshiEKaizikCFisherAHornbergerMPiguetO. Positive behaviour support in frontotemporal dementia: A pilot study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020;31(4):507-530.
28.
KincaidDDunlapGKernL, et al.Positive behavior support: A proposal for updating and refining the definition. J Posit Behav Interv. 2016;18(2):69-73.
29.
GoreNJMcGillPToogoodS, et al.Definition and scope for positive behavioural support. Int J Positive Behav Sup. 2013;3(2):14-23.
30.
FeeneyTJAchilichJ. Structured flexibility and context-sensitive behavioral support for the chronically cranky. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34:709-723.
31.
BirdMLlewellyn-JonesRHKortenASmithersH. A controlled trial of a predominantly psychosocial approach to BPSD: Treating causality. Int Psychogeriatr. 2007;19(5):874-891.
32.
BirdMLlewellyn-JonesRHKortenA. An evaluation of the effectiveness of a case-specific approach to challenging behaviour associated with dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2009;13(1):73-83.
33.
de OliveiraAMRadanovicMHomem de MelloPC, et al.An intervention to reduce neuropsychiatric symptoms and caregiver burden in dementia: Preliminary results from a randomized trial of the tailored activity program-outpatient version. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr. 2019;34(9):1301-1307.
34.
BurleyCLivingstonGKnappMWimoANormanRBrodatyH. Time to invest in prevention and better care of behaviors and psychological symptoms associated with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020;32(5):567-572.
35.
FisherABellonMLawnSLennonS. Identifying current practices and supports in behaviour management following ABI in South Australian community settings: A delphi study. Brain Impair. 2017;18(2):211-225.
36.
TurnerBFlemingJOwnsworthTCornwellP. Perceived service and support needs during transition from hospital to home following acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(10):818-829.
37.
O’ConnorMCFisherACheungSCCagaJPiguetO. Supporting behaviour change in younger-onset dementia: mapping the needs of family carers in the community. Aging Ment Health. 2021. AHEAD-OF-PRINT.
38.
FisherABellonMLawnSLennonS. The development of a positive behaviour support programme for families following acquired brain injury. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2018;25(10):358-551.
39.
FisherABellonMLawnSLennonSSohlbergM. Family-directed approach to brain injury (FAB) model: A preliminary framework to guide family-directed intervention for indviduals with brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:854-860.
40.
FisherABellonMLawnSLennonS. Family perspectives on the acceptability and usefulness of the FAB positive behaviour support program: A pilot study. Brain Injury. 2021;35(5):609-619.
41.
ChiN-CDemirisG. A systematic review of telehealth tools and interventions to support family caregivers. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(1):37-44.
42.
KimSShawCWilliamsKNHeinM. Typology of technology-supported dementia care interventions from an in-home telehealth trial. West J Nurs Res. 2019;41(12):1724-1746.
43.
NgKPChiewHJHameedS, et al.Frontotemporal dementia and COVID-19: Hypothesisgeneration and roadmap for future research. Alzheimer's Dementia: Translational Res Clin Intervent. 2021;6:e12085.
44.
TomlinsonSRLGoreNMcGillP. Training individuals to implement applied behavior analytic procedures via telehealth: A systematic review of the literature. J Behav Educ. 2018;27:172-222.
45.
GerowSRadhakrishnanSDavisTN, et al.Parent-implemented brief functional analysis and treatment withcoaching via telehealth. J Appl Behav Anal. 2021;54:54-69.
FisherA. A Family-Directed Approach to Brain Injury in Community Settings: The Development of a Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) Program. Electronic Thesis Collection College of Nursing and Health Sciences. Flinders University; 2017.
48.
HottBLLimbergDOhrtJHSchmitMK. Reporting results of single-case studies. J Counsel Dev. 2015;93(4):412-417.
49.
MioshiEHsiehSSavageSHornbergerMHodgesJR. Clinical staging and disease progression in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2010;74(20):1591-1597.
50.
GelinasIGauthierLMcIntyreMGauthierS. Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer’s disease: The disability assessment for dementia. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53:471-481.
51.
HsiehH-FShannonSE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-1288.
52.
KuckartzU. Three basic methods of qualitative text analysis. In: KuckartzU, ed. Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014:65-121.
53.
LawsonEJamesI. The application of positive behavioural support to dementia: Insights from experts in behaviours that challenge. FPOP Bulletin. 2019;147:14-23.
54.
FosterAMArmstrongJBuckleyA, et al.Encouraging family engagement in the rehabilitation process: a rehabilitation provider's development of support strategies for family members of people with traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(22):1855-1862.
55.
GagnonALinJStergiou-KitaM. Family members facilitating community re-integration and return to productivity following traumatic brain injury - motivations, roles, and challenges. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(5):433-441.
56.
KreutzerJSGervasioAHCamplairPS. Primary caregivers’ psychological status and family functioning after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1994;8(3):197-210.
57.
GibsonJLPenningtonRCStenhoffDMHopperJS. Using desktop videoconferencing to deliver interventions to a preschool student with autism. Topics Early Childhood Special Edu Primary Care. 2010;29(4):414.
58.
LindgrenSWackerDSuessA, et al.Telehealth and autism: Treating challenging behavior at lower cost. Pediatrics. 2016;132(S2):S167-S175.
59.
Van LangenhoveTLeytonCEPiguetOHodgesJR. Comparing longitudinal behavior changes in the primary progressive aphasias. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;53(3):1033-1042.
60.
FisherALennonSBellonMLawnS. Family involvement in behaviour management following acquired brain injury (ABI) in community settings: A systematic review. Brain Inj. 2015;29(6):661-675.
61.
KirkMAMooreJEWiltsey StirmanSBirkenSA. Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations’ impact: The model for adaptation design and impact (MADI). Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):56.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
