Late-career physicians (LCPs) are at risk for cognitive changes that may affect their ability to practice medicine. This review aggregates and discusses research that has examined cognitive functioning among physicians, typically when clinically referred for various medical and psychological reasons that may interfere with their ability to practice medicine. Special consideration is devoted to the role of approaches for examining cognitive functioning (e.g., cognitive screening, cognitive testing, & neuropsychological assessment), normative challenges, and cultural factors that should be considered when evaluating a physician. Based on published studies, there is evidence supportive of the use of cognitive testing and neuropsychological assessment among physicians in a fitness for duty setting. However, prospective studies designed to identify physicians at-risk (i.e., to prevent medical error) are lacking. Additional research is warranted to establish physician-based normative reference groups and aid in test interpretation and prognostication. Moreover, given limitations associated with cognitive testing in isolation, there is a potential role for comprehensive neuropsychological assessment to identify cognitive changes in physicians and provide a supportive pathway to preserve physicians’ ability to practice medicine.
YoungAChaudhryHJPeiXArnhartKDuganMSteingardSA. FSMB census of licensed physicians in the United States, 2018. JMR. 2019;105(2):7–23.
2.
KindigDASchmelzerJRHongW. Age distribution and turnover of physicians in nonmetropolitan counties of the United States. Health Serv Res. 1992;27(4):565.
3.
Centers for Workforce Studies. Physician Specialty Data Book. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2014.
4.
EvaKW. The aging physician: changes in cognitive processing and their impact on medical practice. Acad Med. 2002;77(10):S1–S6.
5.
SalthouseTA. Selective review of cognitive aging. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010;16(5):754–760.
6.
SalthouseTA. Trajectories of normal cognitive aging. Psychol Aging. 2019;34(1):17.
7.
HaradaCNLoveMCNTriebelKL. Normal cognitive aging. Clin Geriatr Med. 2013;29(4):737–752.
8.
WahlinÅMacDonaldSWde FriasCMNilssonL-GDixonRA. How do health and biological age influence chronological age and sex differences in cognitive aging: moderating, mediating, or both?. Psychol Aging. 2006;21(2):318.
9.
Van BoxtelMPPaasFGHouxPJAdamJJTeekenJCJollesJ. Aerobic capacity and cognitive performance in a cross-sectional aging study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(10):1357–1365.
10.
KramerAFBhererLColcombeSJDongWGreenoughWT. Environmental influences on cognitive and brain plasticity during aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(9):M940–M957.
11.
WilliamsBWFlandersPWelindtDWilliamsMV. Importance of neuropsychological screening in physicians referred for performance concerns. PLoS One, 2018;13(11):e0207874.
12.
WallaceJE. Mental health and stigma in the medical profession. Health. 2012;16(1):3–18.
13.
LeeHJDragLLBieliauskasLA, et al.Results from the cognitive changes and retirement among senior surgeons self-report survey. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(5):668–671. e662.
14.
DesRochesCMRaoSRFromsonJA, et al.Physicians perceptions, preparedness for reporting, and experiences related to impaired and incompetent colleagues. JAMA. 2010;304(2):187–193.
PerryWCreanRD. A retrospective review of the neuropsychological test performance of physicians referred for medical infractions. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005;20(2):161–170.
17.
TurnbullJCarbotteRHannaE, et al.Cognitive difficulty in physicians. Acad Med. 2000;75(2):177–181.
18.
TurnbullJCunningtonJUnsalANormanGFergusonB. Competence and cognitive difficulty in physicians: a follow-up study. Acad Med. 2006;81(10):915–918.
19.
Del BeneVABrandtJ. Identifying neuropsychologically impaired physicians. Clin Neuropsychol. 2020;34(2):318–331.
20.
BieliauskasLALangeneckerSGraverCLeeHJO’NeillJGreenfieldLJ. Cognitive changes and retirement among senior surgeons (CCRASS): results from the CCRASS study. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(1):69–78.
21.
CooneyLBalcezakT. Cognitive testing of older clinicians prior to recredentialing. JAMA. 2020;323(2):179–180.
22.
BlockCKJohnson-GreeneDPliskinNBoakeC. Discriminating cognitive screening and cognitive testing from neuropsychological assessment: implications for professional practice. Clin Neuropsychol. 2017;31(3):487–500.
23.
Roebuck-SpencerTMGlenTPuenteAE, et al.Cognitive screening tests versus comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries: a national academy of neuropsychology education paper. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017;32(4):491–498.
24.
GarrettKDPerryWWilliamsBKorinekLBazzoDE. Cognitive screening tools for late career physicians: a critical review. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2020;34(3):171–180.
25.
MatarazzoJDGoldsteinSG. The intellectual caliber of medical students. Acad Med. 1972;47(2):102–111.
26.
WechslerD. The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence. Williams & Wilkins; 1972.
27.
PowellDH. MicroCog: Assessment of Cognitive Functioning: Manual. Psychological Corporation; 1993.
28.
WeintraubSPowellDHWhitlaDK. Successful cognitive aging: Individual differences among physicians on a computerized test of mental state. J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1994;27(1):15–34.
29.
BrooksBLHoldnackJAIversonGL. Advanced clinical interpretation of the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV: prevalence of low scores varies by level of intelligence and years of education. Assessment. 2011;18(2):156–167.
30.
BrooksBLStraussEShermanEIversonGLSlickDJ. Developments in neuropsychological assessment: refining psychometric and clinical interpretive methods. Canadian Psychol/Psycholo canadi. 2009;50(3):196.
31.
SchretlenDJTestaSMWinickiJMPearlsonGDGordonB. Frequency and bases of abnormal performance by healthy adults on neuropsychological testing. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008;14(3):436–445.
32.
BrooksBLIversonGLWhiteT.Substantial risk of Accidental MCI in healthy older adults: base rates of low memory scores in neuropsychological assessment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13(3):490.
33.
KorinekLLThompsonLLMcRaeCKorinekE. Do physicians referred for competency evaluations have underlying cognitive problems?Acad Med. 2009;84(8):1015–1021.
BinderLMIversonGLBrooksBL. To err is human: abnormal neuropsychological scores and variability are common in healthy adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;24(1):31–46.
36.
KatariaNBrownNMcAvoyPMajeedARhodesM. A retrospective study of cognitive function in doctors and dentists with suspected performance problems: an unsuspected but significant concern. JRSM Open. 2014;5(5):2042533313517687.
37.
WilliamsBWFlandersPGraceESKorinekEWelindtDWilliamsMV. Assessment of fitness for duty of underperforming physicians: the importance of using appropriate norms. PloS one. 2017;12(10):e0186902.
38.
PedrazaOMungasD. Measurement in cross-cultural neuropsychology. Neuropsychol Rev. 2008;18(3):184–193.
39.
ManlyJJ.Critical issues in cultural neuropsychology: profit from diversity. Neuropsychol Rev. 2008;18(3):179.
40.
Rivera MindtMByrdDSaezPManlyJ. Increasing culturally competent neuropsychological services for ethnic minority populations: a call to action. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24(3):429–453.
41.
Buré-ReyesAHidalgo-RuzzanteNVilar-LópezR, et al.Neuropsychological test performance of Spanish speakers: is performance different across different Spanish-speaking subgroups?. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(4):404–412.
42.
SueSChangJ. The state of psychological assessment in Asia. Psychol Assess. 2003;15(3):306.
43.
SandovalTCGollanTHFerreiraVSSalmonDP. What causes the bilingual disadvantage in verbal fluency? The dual-task analogy. Bilingualism. 2010;13(2):231.
44.
BlasierRB. The problem of the aging surgeon: when surgeon age becomes a surgical risk factor. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(2):402–411.
45.
RosengartTKDohertyGHigginsRKibbeMRMosenthalAC. Transition planning for the senior surgeon: guidance and recommendations from the society of surgical chairs. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(7):647–653.
46.
SnyderCJBarrettGV. The age discrimination in employment act: a review of court decisions. Exp Aging Res. 1988;14(1):3–47.
47.
DurningSJArtinoARHolmboeEBeckmanTJvan der VleutenCSchuwirthL. Aging and cognitive performance: challenges and implications for physicians practicing in the 21st century. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010;30(3):153–160.
48.
Chase-LubitzJF. Legal issues and the aging physician. R I Med J. 2017;100(9):23.
49.
DeviG. Alzheimer’s disease in physicians—assessing professional competence and tempering stigma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(12):1073–1075.
WhiteAASageWMOsinskaPHSalgaonkarMJGallagherTH. Patient safety and the ageing physician: a qualitative study of key stakeholder attitudes and experiences. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(6):468–475.
52.
MoutierCYBazzoDENorcrossWA. Approaching the issue of the aging physician population. JMR. 2013;99(1):10–18.
53.
California Public Protection & Physician Health I. Assessing Late Career Practitioners: Policies and Procedures for Age-based Screening. Public Protection & Physician Health, Inc; 2014.
54.
SataloffRTHawkshawMKutinskyJMaitzEA. The aging physician and surgeon. Ear Nose Throat J. 2016;95(4-5):E35–E48.
55.
DuffK. Evidence-based indicators of neuropsychological change in the individual patient: relevant concepts and methods. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;27(3):248–261.
56.
PollesAGWilliamsMKPhalinBRTeitelbaumSMerloLJ. Neuropsychological impairment associated with substance use by physicians. J Neurol Sci. 2020;411:116714.
57.
GoldKJAndrewLBGoldmanEBSchwenkTL. I would never want to have a mental health diagnosis on my record: a survey of female physicians on mental health diagnosis, treatment, and reporting. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;43:51–57.
