Computerized cognitive training has been successful in healthy older adults, but its efficacy has been mixed in patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).
Methods:
In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel clinical trial, we examined the short- and long-term efficacy of a brain-plasticity computerized cognitive training in 113 participants with amnestic MCI.
Results:
Immediately after 40-hours of training, participants in the active control group who played computer games performed better than those in the experimental group on the primary cognitive outcome (p = 0.02), which was an auditory memory/attention composite score. There were no group differences on 2 secondary outcomes (global cognitive composite and rating of daily functioning). After 1 year, there was no difference between the 2 groups on primary or secondary outcomes. No adverse events were noted.
Conclusions:
Although the experimental cognitive training program did not improve outcomes in those with MCI, the short-term effects of the control group should not be dismissed, which may alter treatment recommendations for these patients.
BallKBerchDBHelmersKF, et al.Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2002;288(18):2271–2281.
2.
WolinskyFDUnverzagtFWSmithDMJonesRStoddardATennstedtSL. The ACTIVE cognitive training trial and health-related quality of life: protection that lasts for 5 years. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(12):1324–1329.
3.
RebokGWBallKGueyLT, et al.Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(1):16–24.
4.
MahnckeHWConnorBBAppelmanJ, et al.Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: a randomized, controlled study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(33):12523–12528.
5.
SmithGEHousenPYaffeK, et al.A cognitive training program based on principles of brain plasticity: results from the Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT) study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(4):594–603.
6.
ZelinskiEMSpinaLMYaffeK, et al.Improvement in memory with plasticity-based adaptive cognitive training: results of the 3-month follow-up. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(2):258–265.
7.
BarnesDEYaffeKBelforN, et al.Computer-based cognitive training for mild cognitive impairment: results from a pilot randomized, controlled trial. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009;23(3):205–210.
8.
StyliadisCKartsidisPParaskevopoulosEIoannidesAABamidisPD. Neuroplastic effects of combined computerized physical and cognitive training in elderly individuals at risk for dementia: an eLORETA controlled study on resting states. Neural Plast. 2015;2015:172192.
9.
GoodingALChoiJFiszdonJM, et al.Comparing three methods of computerised cognitive training for older adults with subclinical cognitive decline. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2016;26(5-6):810–821.
10.
KnoefelFGaudetCZuniniRL, et al.Implementation of a brain training pilot study for people with mild cognitive impairment. Can Geriatr J. 2018;21(3):264–268.
11.
LinFHeffnerKLRenP, et al.Cognitive and neural effects of vision-based speed-of-processing training in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(6):1293–1298.
12.
ValdesEGAndelRListerJJGamaldoAEdwardsJD. Can cognitive speed of processing training improve everyday functioning among older adults with psychometrically defined mild cognitive impairment?J Aging Health. 2019;31(4):595–610.
13.
ChandlerMJParksACMarsiskeMRotblattLJSmithGE. Everyday impact of cognitive interventions in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rev. 2016;26(3):225–251.
14.
HillNTMowszowskiLNaismithSLChadwickVLValenzuelaMLampitA.Computerized cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(4):329–340.
15.
AlbertMSDeKoskySTDicksonD, et al.The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270–279.
16.
FlakMMHolHRHernesSS, et al.Adaptive computerized working memory training in patients with mild cognitive impairment. A randomized double-blind active controlled trial. Front Psychol. 2019;10:807.
17.
HyerLScottCAtkinsonMM, et al.Cognitive training program to improve working memory in older adults with MCI. Clin Gerontol. 2016;39(5):410–427.
RandolphC. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. The Psychological Coporation; 1998.
20.
GalaskoDBennettDSanoM, et al.An inventory to assess activities of daily living for clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease. The Alzheimer’s disease cooperative study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11Suppl 2:S33–S39.
21.
YesavageJABrinkTLRoseTL, et al.Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1983;17(1):37–49.
22.
WilkinsonGSRobertsonGJ. WRAT 4: Wide Range Achievement Test; professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Incorporated.; 2006.
23.
CoffmanCJEdelmanDWoolsonRF. To condition or not condition? Analysing ‘change’ in longitudinal randomised controlled trials. BMJ open. 2016;6(12): e013096.
24.
BasakCQinSO’ConnellMA. Differential effects of cognitive training modules in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment: A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychol Aging. 2020;35(2):220–249.
25.
Teixeira-SantosACMoreiraCSMagalhaesR, et al.Reviewing working memory training gains in healthy older adults: A meta-analytic review of transfer for cognitive outcomes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;103:163–177.
26.
PedrosaHDe SaAGuerreiroM, et al.Functional evaluation distinguishes MCI patients from healthy elderly people--the ADCS/MCI/ADL Scale. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14(8):703–709.
27.
ChandlerMJLockeDECrookJE, et al.Comparative effectiveness of behavioral interventions on quality of life for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(5):e193016.
28.
JakAJBondiMWDelano-WoodL, et al.Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17(5):368–375.
29.
Sales-GalanAMelendez-MoralJCMayordomo-RodriguezT. Using a cognitive plasticity measure to detect mild cognitive impairment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;28(8):763–770.
30.
SchreiberMSchneiderR. Cognitive plasticity in people at risk for dementia: optimising the testing-the-limits-approach. Aging Ment Health. 2007;11(1):75–81.
31.
XuHYangRDinticaC, et al.Association of lifespan cognitive reserve indicator with the risk of mild cognitive impairment and its progression to dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16(6):873–882.
32.
HaussmannRvon Lieres Und WilkauAFESauerCNillesFDonixM. Impact of cognitive reserve on clinical and neuropsychological measures in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Australas Psychiatry. 2020;28(4):386–390.
33.
van LoenhoudACvan der FlierWMWinkAM, et al.Cognitive reserve and clinical progression in Alzheimer disease: A paradoxical relationship. Neurology. 2019;93(4):e334–e346.
34.
Udeh-MomohCTSuBEvansS, et al.Cortisol, Amyloid-beta, and Reserve predicts alzheimer’s disease progression for cognitively normal older adults. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(2):553–562.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
