This study aims to identify individual determinants of antidepressant treatment and outpatient rehabilitation after stroke. People with ischemic stroke (N = 303) recruited at 2 inpatient rehabilitation clinics were included into a prospective longitudinal study with follow-up telephone interviews 6 and 12 months later. Participants reported on their use of antidepressant medication and psychotherapy as well as physical, occupational, speech, and neuropsychological therapy. The use of antidepressants at discharge (n = 65, 23.8%) was predicted by the severity of depressive symptoms, severity of stroke, history of depression, and use of antidepressants at admission (all p < .05, R2= .55). The number of outpatient rehabilitation services used at follow-ups was predicted by higher functional and cognitive impairment, higher education, younger age, severity of depressive symptoms, and lower self-efficacy (all p < .05; R26M = .24, R212M = .49). The relevance of identified determinants for the improvement of treatment rates after stroke is discussed.
MurrayCJLopezAD. Measuring the global burden of disease. N Eng J Med. 2013;369(5):448–457.
2.
JohnsonCONguyenMRothGA, et al.Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):439–458.
3.
TowfighiAOvbiageleBEl HusseiniN, et al.Poststroke depression: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;48(2):e30–e43. doi:10.1161/STR0000000000000113
4.
GladerELSjolanderMErikssonMLundbergM. Persistent use of secondary preventive drugs declines rapidly during the first 2 years after stroke. Stroke. 2010;41(2):397–401.
5.
HackettMLPicklesK. Part I: frequency of depression after stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(8):1017–1025.
6.
HackettMLAndersonCSHouseAXiaJ. Interventions for treating depression after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(4):CD003437.
7.
WangS-BWangYYZhangQE, et al.Cognitive behavioral therapy for post-stroke depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2018;235:589–596.
8.
LadwigSZhouZXuY, et al.Comparison of treatment rates of depression after stroke versus myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational data. Psychosom Med. 2018;80(8):754–763.
9.
HebertDLindsayMPMcIntyreA, et al.Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(4):459–484.
10.
WinsteinCJSteinJArenaR, et al.Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98–e169.
11.
PeschkeDSchnitzerSKuhlmeyASchenkL. Physio-and occupational therapy pathways of stroke patients and stroke mortality. Die Rehabil. 2014;53(4):224–229.
12.
PalmerRWittsHChaterT. What speech and language therapy do community dwelling stroke survivors with aphasia receive in the UK?PloS One. 2018;13(7):e0200096.
13.
BhattacharjeeSAl YamiMKurdiSAxonDR. Prevalence, patterns and predictors of depression treatment among community-dwelling older adults with stroke in the United States: a cross sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):130.
14.
AndersenRM. National health surveys and the behavioral model of health services use. Med Care. 2008;46(7):647–653.
15.
AndersenRM. A Behavioral Model of Families’ Use of Health Services. Center of Health Administration Studies. University of Chicago; 1968.
16.
MartosAJWilsonPAGordonARLightfootMMeyerIH. Like finding a unicorn: healthcare preferences among lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2018;208:126–133.
17.
BabitschBGohlDvon LengerkeT. Re-revisiting Andersen’s behavioral model of health services use: a systematic review of studies from 1998–2011. GMS Psycho-Soc Med. 2012;9:Doc11.
18.
ThodeNBergmannEKamtsiurisPKurthB.Predictors for ambulatory medical care utilization in Germany. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz. 2005;48(3):296–306.
19.
AndersenRM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36(1):1–10.
20.
MeadGEHsiehCFLeeR, et al.Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for stroke recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013;44(3):844–850.
21.
DennisMMeadGForbesJ, et al.Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (FOCUS): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10168):265–274.
22.
MacleanNPoundPWolfeCRuddA. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients’ motivation for rehabilitation. BMJ. 2000;321(7268):1051–1054.
23.
GillenRTennenHMcKeeTEGernert-DottPAffleckG. Depressive symptoms and history of depression predict rehabilitation efficiency in stroke patients. Arch Physical Med Rehabil. 2001;82(12):1645–1649.
24.
MahoneyFBarthelD.Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
25.
FolsteinMFFolsteinSEMcHughPR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
26.
SchwarzerRJerusalemM. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: WeinmanJWrightSJohnstonM, eds. Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio—Casual and Control Beliefs. NFER-NELSON; 1995:35–37.
27.
FydrichTGeyerMHesselASommerGBrählerE.Social support questionnaire (F-SozU): norms of a representative sample. Diagnostica. 1999;45(4):212–216.
28.
YesavageJASheikhJI. Geriatric depression scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol. 1986;5(1-2):165–173.
29.
LökkJDelbariA. Management of depression in elderly stroke patients. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:539–549.
30.
American Psychiatric Association. Task Force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR. American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
31.
WittchenHWunderlichUGruschwitzSZaudigM. SKID-I. Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Achse I: Psychische Störungen [SCID-I. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, Axis I Disorders]. Hogrefe; 1997.
32.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.
33.
MeyerBCHemmenTMJacksonCMLydenPD. Modified national institutes of health stroke scale for use in stroke clinical trials: prospective reliability and validity. Stroke. 2002;33(5):1261–1266.
34.
PeduzziPConcatoJKemperEHolfordTRFeinsteinAR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–1379.
35.
AyerbeLAyisSWolfeCDRuddAG. Natural history, predictors and outcomes of depression after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202(1):14–21.
36.
ErikssonMAsplundKGladerEL, et al.Self-reported depression and use of antidepressants after stroke: a national survey. Stroke. 2004;35(4):936–941.
37.
El HusseiniNGoldsteinLBPetersonED, et al.Depression and antidepressant use after stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2012;43(6):1609–1616.
38.
MortensenJKJohnsenSPAndersenG.Prescription and predictors of post-stroke antidepressant treatment: a population-based study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2018;138(3):235–244.
39.
KimJKimY. Which patients are prescribed escitalopram? Predictors for escitalopram prescriptions and functional outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(6):1085.
40.
SalterKAndrew McClureJMahonHFoleyNTeasellR.Adherence to Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care: assessment and management of poststroke depression in an Ontario rehabilitation facility. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(2):132–140.
41.
KutlubaevMAHackettML. Part II: predictors of depression after stroke and impact of depression on stroke outcome: an updated systematic review of observational studies. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(8):1026–1036.
42.
PreacherKJHayesAF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(3):879–891.
43.
JanSEssueBMGlozierNLindleyRLiQHackettML. Are rehabilitation services following stroke accessed equitably in Australia? Findings from the psychosocial outcomes in stroke (POISE) cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):884.
44.
OstwaldSKGodwinKMCheongHCronSG. Predictors of resuming therapy within four weeks after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(1):80–91.
45.
CookCStickleyLRameyKKnottsVJ. Variables associated with occupational and physical therapy stroke rehabilitation utilization and outcomes. J Allied Health. 2005;34(1):3–10.
46.
WangYCKapelluschJGargA. Important factors influencing the return to work after stroke. Work. 2014;47(4):553–559.
47.
VolzMVoelkleMCWerheidK. General self-efficacy as a driving factor of post-stroke depression: a longitudinal study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(9):1426–1438.
48.
BanduraA.Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
49.
SmithSConnollyS.Re-thinking unmet need for health care: Introducing a dynamic perspective. Health Econ Policy Law. 2020;15(4):440–457. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
