Screening measures are widely used in medicine to assess the increased probability that members of a defined population have a particular condition and therefore require more extensive assessment. The rationale for prospective screening of late career physicians (LCPs) is drawn from the following circumstances: Senior physicians—prone to the vicissitudes of aging—comprise nearly a third of the US physician workforce, physicians are poor at self-evaluation, data suggest many have clinically relevant cognitive decline, and screening is an evidence-based, method to detect individuals at risk and determine whether a comprehensive evaluation is necessary. A handful of professional organizations (eg, surgeons, obstetricians, and a growing number of medical staff credentialing committees) have developed policies in this arena. This focused review compares cognitive screening methods used or recommended for LCPs, with particular attention to the psychometric properties, ease of operational implementation, and appropriate application to physicians—a population selected for high cognitive reserve and skills. Further, we identify gaps in knowledge and practice, including the need for more career-span normative data on physicians’ cognitive and work performance. Stakeholders can improve rehabilitation and other supports to LCPs in transition, calling upon the unique expertise of those neuropsychologists who are trained on conducting fitness for duty evaluations, as well as rehabilitation professionals who can assist in developing modifications to practice when indicated or facilitate graceful transitions to retirement when necessary.
WhiteAASageWMOsinskaPHSalgaonkarMJGallagherTH. Patient safety and the ageing physician: a qualitative study of key stakeholder attitudes and experiences. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;28:468–475.
2.
HaydenKMReedBRManlyJJ, et al.Cognitive decline in the elderly: an analysis of population heterogeneity. Age Ageing. 2011;40(6):684–689.
WilliamsBW. It’s not just about aging: Physician health as a primary determinant of safe medical practice. Invited presentation at: Coalition for Physician Enhancement 2019 Fall Meeting; October 2019; American Medical Association, Chicago, USA.
American Medical Association Council on Medical Education. Assuring safe and effective care for patients by senior/late career physicians; 2015.
8.
BlockCKJohnson-GreeneDPliskinNCorwinB. Discriminating cognitive screening and cognitive testing from neuropsychological assessment: implications for professional practice. Clin Neuropsychol. 2017;31(3):487–500.
9.
MaximLDNieboRUtellMJ. Screening tests: a review with examples. Inhal Toxicol. 2014;26(3):811–828.
10.
CooneyLBalcezakT. Cognitive testing of older clinicians prior to recredentialing. JAMA. 2020;323(2):179–180.
11.
GarrettKD. Systematic prospective cognitive screening programs for medical staff. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015;21(suppl 1):99.
12.
GarrettKD. Prospective screening of late career physicians: Best practices for this growing practice. Invited presentation at: Coalition for Physician Enhancement 2019 Fall Meeting; October 2019; American Medical Association, Chicago, USA.
13.
BazzoD. Evaluation of the senior physician - experience of the UC San Diego PACE Program. Invited presentation at: Washington Medical Commission; August 22, 2019; Seattle, USA.
14.
American College of Surgeons. Statement on the aging surgeon. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2016;101(1):42–43.
15.
Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement IA. The late-career obstetrician-gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:E200–E204.
16.
HawkinsREWelcherCMElliottVSRichardSPLianaPPaulHW. Ensuring competent care by senior physicians. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016;36(3):226–231.
17.
California Public Protection & Physician Health. Assessing Late-Career Practitioners: Policies and Procedures for Age-Based Screening; 2014.
18.
PowellDKaplanEWhitlaD, et al.MicroCog™ Manual. The Psychological Corporation. Harcourt Brace & Co; 1993.
19.
TariqSHTumosaNChibnallJTMorleyJE. Comparison of the Saint Louis university mental status examination and the mini-mental state examination for detecting dementia and mild neurocognitive disorder—a pilot study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;14(11):900–910.
20.
NasreddineZSPhillipsNABédirianV, et al.The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
21.
MoutierCYBazzoDENorcrossWA. Approaching the issue of the aging physician population. J Med Regulat. 2013;99(1):10–18.
22.
SkibitskyMGarrettKObrayC, et al.Development of a primary care protocol for the diagnosis and treatment of mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. 2016; 12:P795.
23.
PetersenRC. Mild cognitive impairment. N Eng J Med. 2011;364:2227–2234.
24.
RossettiHCLacritzLHCullumCMMyronFW. Normative data for the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in a population-based sample. Neurology. 2011;77(13):1272–1275.
25.
BinderLMIversonGLBrooksBL. To Err is human: “abnormal” neuropsychological scores and variability are common in healthy adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;24(1):31–46.
26.
RandolphCTierneyMCMohrEChaseTN. The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;20(3):310–319.
27.
KarantzoulisSNovitskiJGoldMChristopherR. The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): utility in detection and characterization of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;28(8):837–844.
28.
DuffKClarkHJDO’BryantSEJamesWMRandolphBSPatriciaBS. Utility of the RBANS in detecting cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer’s disease: sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powers. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;23(5):603–612.
29.
RandolphC. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): test manual. Harcourt Brace and Company; 1998.
30.
DuffKPattonDSchoenbergMRJamesMJamesGSRussellLA. Age-and education-corrected independent normative data for the RBANS in a community dwelling elderly sample. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;17(3):351–366.
31.
DuffKPattonDESchoenbergMRJamesMJamesGSRussellLA. Intersubtest discrepancies on the RBANS: results from the OKLAHOMA Study. Appl Neuropsychol. 2011;18(2):79–85.
32.
PattonDEDuffKSchoenbergMRJamesMJamesGSRussellLA. Performance of cognitively normal African Americans on the RBANS in community dwelling older adults. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;17(4):515–530.
33.
DuffKSperingCCO’BryantSE, et al.The RBANS effort index: Base rates in geriatric samples. Appl Neuropsychol. 2011;18(1):11–17.
34.
FreilichBMHyerLA. Relation of the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status to measures of daily functioning in dementia. Psychol Rep. 2007;101(1):119–129.
35.
BadenesGDCasasHLAguilarBM. Discriminación de la valoración de la capacidad de conducción de vehículos en personas con diagnóstico de deterioro cognitivo ligero y demencia en los exámenes de conducción normalizados. Mapfre Medicina. 2007;18(2):98–107.
36.
MahnckeH. Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: a randomized, controlled study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(33):12523–12528.
37.
FörsterSTeipelSZachC, et al.FDG-PET mapping the brain substrates of visuo-constructive processing in Alzheimer s disease. J Psychiatr Res. 2010;44(7):462–469.
38.
WilsonJSMruthintiSBuccafuscoJJ, et al.Anti-RAGE and Aβ immunoglobulin levels are related to dementia level and cognitive performance. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64(2):264–271.
39.
PenberthyK. Lessons learned from early adopters of LCP programs: University of Virginia. Invited presentation at: Accelerating the Development of Late Career Practitioner Policies at US Healthcare Institutions; May 2018; Seattle, USA.
40.
ShwartzSKMorrisRDPennaS. Psychometric properties of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2019;26(2):101–110.
41.
PriceCCCunninghamHCoronadoN, et al.Clock drawing in the Montreal cognitive assessment: recommendations for dementia assessment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2011;31(3):179–187.
42.
SalkindNJ. Ceiling effect. In: Encyclopedia of Research Design. Sage Publications; 2010.
GreenRCGreenJHarrisonJMKutnerMH. Screening for cognitive impairment in older individuals: validation study of a computer-based test. Arch Neurol. 1994;51(8):779–786.
45.
WilliamsBWFlandersPGraceESElizabethKDillonWMichaelVW. Assessment of fitness for duty of underperforming physicians: The importance of using appropriate norms. PloS One. 2017;12(10):e0186902.
46.
KorinekLLThompsonLLMcRaeCElizabethK. Do physicians referred for competency evaluations have underlying cognitive problems?Acad Med. 2009;84(8):1015–1021.
47.
WildKHowiesonDWebbeFAdrianaSJeffreyK. Status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: a systematic review. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2008;4(6):428–437.
48.
KaneRLSpencerTRShortPMichaelKJeffreyW. Identifying and monitoring cognitive deficits in clinical populations using automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (ANAM) tests. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22(suppl 1):S115–S126.
49.
WoodhouseJHeyankaDJScottJ, et al.Efficacy of the ANAM general neuropsychological screening battery (ANAM GNS) for detecting neurocognitive impairment in a mixed clinical sample. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(3):376–385.
50.
SpencerTRSunWCernichANKathyFJosephB. Assessing change with the automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (ANAM): issues and challenges. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22(suppl 1):S79–S87.
51.
VincentASBleibergJYanS, et al.Reference data from the automated neuropsychological assessment metrics for use in traumatic brain injury in an active duty military sample. Mil Med. 2008;173(9):836–852.
52.
FriedlKEGrateSJProctorSP, et al.Army research needs for automated neuropsychological tests: monitoring soldier health and performance status. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22(suppl 1):S7–S14.
American Medical Association Council on Medical Education. Competency of Senior Physicians; 2018.
55.
CruessSRCruessRL. Professionalism and medicine’s social contract with society. AMA J Ethics. 2004;6:185–188.
56.
GreenfieldLJProctorMC. Attitudes toward retirement. A survey of the American surgical association. Ann Surg. 1994;220(3):382–389.
57.
DellingerEPPellegriniCAGallagherTH. The aging physician and the medical profession: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(10):967–971.
58.
DavisDAMazmanianPEFordisMHarrisonRVKevinETLaureP. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1094–1102.
59.
DunningDJohnsonKEhrlingerJJustinK. Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2003;12:83–87.
60.
KrugerJDunningD. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77(6):1121–1134.
61.
BlasierRB. The problem of the aging surgeon: when surgeon age becomes a surgical risk factor. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:402–411.
62.
PetersenRCCaraccioloBBrayneCGauthierSJelicVFratiglioniL. Mild cognitive impairment: a concept in evolution. J Intern Med. 2014;275(3):214–228.
63.
Dailey-ProvostJ. Professional Competency Standards Amendments. State of Utah Code 58-67-302; 2019.
64.
HawkinsREWelcherCMStagg ElliottVRichardSPLianaPPaulHW. Ensuring competent care by senior physicians. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016;36(3):226–231.
65.
DurningSJArtinoARHolmboeEThomasJBCees van derVLambertS. Aging and cognitive performance: challenges and implications for physicians practicing in the 21st century. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010;30(3):153–160.
66.
GuardadoJR. Policy Research Perspectives: Medical Liability Claim Frequency Among U.S. Physicians. AMA Economic and Health Policy Research; 2017.
67.
RosengartTKDohertyGHigginsGKibbeMRMosenthalAC. Transition planning for the senior surgeon: Guidance and recommendations from the Society of Surgical Chairs. JAMA Surgery. 2019;154(7):647–653.
WhitesideH. Health Care Systems, Malpractice Insurors, and Aging Physicians: Emerging Age-Based Assessment Practices. Symposium presentation at: American Psychiatric Association; May, 2019; San Fransico, USA.
