Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) may exhibit smaller striatal volumes reflecting deficits in the reward circuit. Deficits may change with age and be more pronounced among the melancholic subtype. Limited research has investigated striatal volume differences in older adults and by depression subtypes.
Method:
We used baseline data from the Neurocognitive Outcomes of Depression in the Elderly study. We examined volumetric differences in the putamen and caudate nucleus among older adults (60 years and older), comparing healthy control participants (n = 134) to depressed participants (n = 226), and comparing nonmelancholic depressed participants (n = 93) to melancholic depressed participants (n = 133). Group-by-age interactions were examined.
Results:
There were no significant group differences for the caudate nucleus. For the left putamen, investigation of the significant group-by-age interaction revealed that volume size was greater for the healthy controls compared to the depressed participants but only at younger ages (60-65 years); group differences diminished with increasing age. Examining volume by depression subtype revealed that the melancholic depressed participants had a smaller left putamen compared to the nonmelancholic depressed participants. Anhedonia symptoms were related to both smaller left and right putamen.
Conclusion:
Structural abnormalities in reward regions may underlie the anhedonic phenotype. Volume loss associated with MDD may attenuate in older age.
ProudfitGH. The reward positivity: from basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression. Psychophysiology. 2015;52(4):449–459. doi:10.1111/psyp.12370.
2.
RussoSJNestlerEJ. The brain reward circuitry in mood disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(9):609–625. doi:10.1038/nrn3381.
3.
MeyerJHKrugerSWilsonAA. Lower dopamine transporter binding potential in striatum during depression. Neuroreport. 2001;12(18):4121–4125. doi:10.1097/00001756-200112210-00052.
4.
PizzagalliDAHolmesAJDillonDG. Reduced caudate and nucleus accumbens response to rewards in unmedicated individuals with major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166(6):702–710. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08081201.
5.
KandelERSchwartzJHJessellTMSiegelbaumSAHudspethAJ. Principles of Neural Science. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013.
LiuXHairstonJSchrierMFanJ. Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(5):1219–1236. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.012.
8.
LuYLiangHHanD. The volumetric and shape changes of the putamen and thalamus in first episode, untreated major depressive disorder. NeuroImage Clin. 2016;11:658–666. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2016.04.008.
9.
ParashosIATuplerLABlitchingtonTKrishnanKR. Magnetic-resonance morphometry in patients with major depression. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 1998;84(1):7–15. doi:10.1016/S0925-4927(98)00042-0.
10.
SacchetMDLivermoreEEIglesiasJEGloverGHGotlibIH. Subcortical volumes differentiate major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and remitted major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;68:91–98. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.06.002.
11.
FotiDCarlsonJMSauderCLProudfitGH. Reward dysfunction in major depression: multimodal neuroimaging evidence for refining the melancholic phenotype. Neuroimage. 2014;101:50–58. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.058.
12.
SacchetMDCamachoMCLivermoreEEThomasEACGotlibIH. Accelerated aging of the putamen in patients with major depressive disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2017;42(3):164–171. doi:10.1503/jpn.160010.
13.
NelsonBDPerlmanGKleinDNKotovRHajcakG. Blunted neural response to rewards as a prospective predictor of the development of depression in adolescent girls. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(12):1223–1230. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15121524.
14.
PapmeyerMSussmannJEStewartT. Prospective longitudinal study of subcortical brain volumes in individuals at high familial risk of mood disorders with or without subsequent onset of depression. Psychiatry Res2016;248:119–125. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.12.009.
15.
LacerdaALTNicolettiMABrambillaP. Anatomical MRI study of basal ganglia in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2003;124(3):129–140. doi:10.1016/S0925-4927(03)00123-9.
16.
SchmaalLVeltmanDJvan ErpTGM. Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: findings from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(6):806–812. doi:10.1038/mp.2015.69.
17.
BoraEHarrisonBJDaveyCGYücelMPantelisC. Meta-analysis of volumetric abnormalities in cortico-striatal-pallidal-thalamic circuits in major depressive disorder. Psychol Med. 2012;42(4):671–681. doi:10.1017/S0033291711001668.
18.
ArnoneDMcIntoshAMEbmeierKPMunafòMRAndersonIM. Magnetic resonance imaging studies in unipolar depression: systematic review and meta-regression analyses. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012;22(1):1–16. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.05.003.
19.
KoolschijnPCMPvan HarenNEMLensvelt-MuldersGJLMHulshoff PolHEKahnRS. Brain volume abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(11):3719–3735. doi:10.1002/hbm.20801.
20.
SextonCEMackayCEEbmeierKP. A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies in late-life depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21(2):184–195. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2012.10.019.
21.
RazNRodrigueKMKennedyKMAckerJD. Vascular health and longitudinal changes in brain and cognition in middle-aged and older adults. Neuropsychology. 2007;21(2):149–157. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.149.
22.
FrodlTSKoutsoulerisNBottlenderR. Depression-related variation in brain morphology over 3 years. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(10):1156. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.10.1156.
23.
Gunning-DixonFMHeadDMcQuainJAckerJDRazN. Differential aging of the human striatum: a prospective MR imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19(8):1501–1507.
24.
SchulzJBSkalejMWedekindD. Magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetry differentiates idiopathic parkinson’s syndrome from multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. Ann Neurol. 1999;45(1):65–74. doi:10.1002/1531-8249(199901)45:1<65:: AID-ART12>3.0.CO;2 -1.
25.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
Soriano-MasCHernández-RibasRPujolJ. Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment of structural brain alterations in melancholic depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;69(4):318–325. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.029.
28.
YangXTianKWangDF. Anhedonia correlates with abnormal functional connectivity of the superior temporal gyrus and the caudate nucleus in patients with first-episode drug-naive major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2017;218:284–290. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.053.
29.
KrishnanKRRMcDonaldWMDoraiswamyPM. Neuroanatomical substrates of depression in the elderly. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993;243(1):41–46. doi:10.1007/BF02191522.
30.
DotsonVMDavatzikosCKrautMAResnickSM. Depressive symptoms and brain volumes in older adults: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009;34(5):367–375.
31.
SteffensDCMcQuoidDRKrishnanKR. The Duke Somatic Treatment Algorithm for Geriatric Depression (STAGED) approach. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2002;36(2):58–68.
32.
LandermanRGeorgeLKCampbellRTBlazerDG. Alternative models of the stress buffering hypothesis. Am J Community Psychol. 1989;17(5):625–642. doi:10.1007/BF00922639.
33.
RobinsLN. National institute of mental health diagnostic interview schedule. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(4):381. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001.
34.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition(DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
35.
Sachs-EricssonNCorsentinoEMoxleyJ. A longitudinal study of differences in late- and early-onset geriatric depression: depressive symptoms and psychosocial, cognitive, and neurological functioning. Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(1):1–11. doi:10.1080/13607863.2012.717253.
36.
MontgomerySAAsbergM. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134(4):382–389. doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382.
37.
BaudicSTzortzisCBarbaGDTraykovL. Executive deficits in elderly patients with major unipolar depression. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2004;17(4):195–201. doi:10.1177/0891988704269823.
38.
WilliamsJBWKobakKA. Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA). Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192(1):52–58. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.106.032532.
39.
CockrellJRFolsteinMF. Mini-Mental State Examination. In: Principles and Practice of Geriatric Psychiatry. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 140–141. doi:10.1002/0470846410.ch27(ii).
40.
GE Medical Systems. Signa. Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
41.
MacFallJRByrumCEParashosI. Relative accuracy and reproducibility of regional MRI brain volumes for point-counting methods. Psychiatry Res. 1994;55(3):167–177. doi:10.1016/0925-4927(94)90024-8.
42.
GreenbergDLMesserDFPayneME. Aging, gender, and the elderly adult brain: an examination of analytical strategies. Neurobiol Aging. 2008;29(2):290–302. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.09.016.
43.
PayneMEFetzerDLMacFallJRProvenzaleJMByrumCEKrishnanKR. Development of a semi-automated method for quantification of MRI gray and white matter lesions in geriatric subjects. Psychiatry Res. 2002;115(1-2):63–77. doi:10.1016/S0925-4927(02)00009-4.
44.
GreenbergDLPayneMEMacFallJRProvenzaleJMSteffensDCKrishnanRR. Differences in brain volumes among males and female hormone-therapy users and nonusers. Psychiatry Res. 2006;147(2-3):127–134. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.01.001.
45.
KikinisRShentonMEGerigG. Routine quantitative analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid spaces with MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;2(6):619–629. doi:10.1002/jmri.1880020603.
46.
ByrumCEMacFallJRCharlesHC. Accuracy and reproducibility of brain and tissue volumes using a magnetic resonance segmentation method. Psychiatry Res. 1996;67(3):215–234. doi:10.1016/0925-4927(96)02790-4.
Der-AvakianAMarkouA. The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35(1):68–77. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.005.
49.
GabbayVElyBALiQ. Striatum-based circuitry of adolescent depression and anhedonia. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;52(6):628–641.e13. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.04.003.
50.
PizzagalliDA. Depression, stress, and anhedonia: toward a synthesis and integrated model. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10(1):393–423. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185606.
51.
ScahillRIFrostCJenkinsRWhitwellJLRossorMNFoxNC. A longitudinal study of brain volume changes in normal aging using serial registered magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(7):989–994. doi:10.1001/archneur.60.7.989.
52.
BauerEToepperMGebhardtHGallhoferBSammerG. The significance of caudate volume for age-related associative memory decline. Brain Res. 2015;1622:137–148. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.06.026.
53.
CovinskyKECenzerISYaffeKO’BrienSBlazerDG. Dysphoria and anhedonia as risk factors for disability or death in older persons: Implications for the assessment of geriatric depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22(6):606–613. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2012.12.001.
54.
KleinDNHajcakG. Heterogeneity of depression: clinical considerations and psychophysiological measures. Psychol Inq. 2015;26(3):247–252. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2015.1032873.
55.
VaidyanathanUVriezeSIIaconoWG. The power of theory, research design, and transdisciplinary integration in moving psychopathology forward. Psychol Inq. 2015;26(3):209–230. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2015.1015367.
56.
BouchardJVilledaSA. Aging and brain rejuvenation as systemic events. J Neurochem. 2015;132(1):5–19. doi:10.1111/jnc.12969.
PerlakiGHorvathRNagySA. Comparison of accuracy between FSL’s FIRST and Freesurfer for caudate nucleus and putamen segmentation. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2418. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02584-5.
59.
SnaithRPHamiltonMMorleySHumayanAHargreavesDTrigwellP. A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1995;167(1):99–103. doi:10.1192/bjp.167.1.99.
