The increase in the aging population and the number of patients with dementia led to the research in older adults’ capacity assessment over the last 3 decades. Many cases of contested wills occur due to lack of testamentary capacity (TC), especially in cases of dementia.
Aim:
Purpose of the present study was to overview the legal, medical, and neuropsychological aspects of TC as well as the instruments used for TC assessment.
Findings:
The testator/testatrix with intact TC has realistic perception of his or her property value, lack of psychopathology affecting contact with reality, and intact intention of how and to whom he or she will dispose his or her assets. It is frequent for the health practitioners to serve as “gold standards assessors” by examining an individual’s ability to make a valid will and giving evidence to the court to support or not a will contest. The TC assessment is a complex process of clinical and legal practice requiring usually a variety of methods, that is, interviews, evaluation of clinical records, and administration of neuropsychological instruments.
Conclusion:
The evaluation of TC is a multidimensional process that integrates both the legal and medical field, requiring a collaborative approach to its definition and assessment.
KimSKarlawishJCaineE. Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;10(2):151–165.
2.
O’ ConnorDHallMDonnellyM. Assessing capacity within a context of abuse or neglect. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2009;21(2):156–169. doi:10.1080/08946560902779993.
3.
MarsonDCBriggsSD. Assessing competency in Alzheimer’s disease: Treatment consent capacity and financial capacity. In: GauthierSCummingsJL eds. Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Annual. London, United Kingdom: Dunitz M; 2001:165–192.
4.
ShulmanKCohenCAHullI. Psychiatric issues in retrospective challenges of testamentary capacity. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20(1):63–69. doi:10.1002/gps.1257.
5.
VellingaAJohannesHSvan KeeuwenEvan TilburgWJonkerC. Instruments to assess decision-making capacity: an overview. Int Psychogeriatr. 2004;16(4):397–419.
6.
MobergPKnieleK. Evaluation of competency: ethical considerations for neuropsychologists. Appl Neuropsychol. 2006;13(2):101–114. doi:10.1207/s15324826an1302_5.
ShulmanKHullICohenC. Testamentary capacity and suicide: an overview of legal and psychiatric issues. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2003;26(4):403–415. doi:10.1016/S0160-2527(03)00044-X.
9.
DouzenisALykourasE, eds. Psychiatrodikastiki. Athens, Greece: Medical Editions Pasxalidis; 2008[Book in modern Greek].
10.
AravanisS, ed. 15 Questions & Answers About Elder Abuse. Washington, DC: National Center on Elder Abuse; 2005.
11.
JacobyRSteerP. How to assess capacity to make a will. BMJ. 2007;335(7611):155–157. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39232.706840.AD.
12.
RokedFPatelA. Which aspects of cognitive function are best associated with testamentary capacity in patients with Alzheimer’s disease?Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;23(5):552–553. doi:10.1002/gps.1947.
13.
ShulmanKCohenCKirshF. Assessment of testamentary capacity and vulnerability to undue influence. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(5):722–727doi:10.1176/ajp.2007.164.5.722.
14.
ReganWGordonS. Assessing testamentary capacity in elderly people. South Med J. 1997;90(1):13–15.
15.
DimondB. Exploring the law regarding the making and execution of wills. Br J Nurs. 2005;14(3):152–153. doi:10.12968/bjon.2005.14.3.17520.
16.
LiptzinBPeisahCShulmanKFinkelS; International Psychogeriatric Association Task Force on Testamentary. Testamentary capacity and delirium. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010;22(6):950–956. doi:10.1017/S1041610210000712.
17.
JovanovićAAJovovićSMilovanovićSJasović-GasićM. Medical reasons for retrospective challenges of testamentary capacity. Psychiatr Danub. 2008;20(4):485–493.
18.
RoofJ. Testamentary capacity and guardianship assessments. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2012;35:915–919. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2012.08.011.
19.
FrolikLA. The strange interplay of testamentary capacity and the doctrine of undue influence: are we protecting older testators or overriding individual preferences?Int J Law Psychiatry. 2001;24(2-3):253–266.
20.
DressingHSalizeHJ. Forensic psychiatric assessment in European Union member states. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;114(4):282–289.
21.
CockburnJS, ed. Crime in England. London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis; 1977:1550–1800.
22.
ChampineP. Expertise and instinct in the assessment of testamentary capacity. Villanova Law Rev. 2006;51(1):25–94.
23.
SakkoulasA, ed. Greek Civil Code. Athens, Greece: Sakkoulas; 2000[Book in Modern Greek].
24.
SimonRIGoldLS. Textbook of Forensic Psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2004.
25.
KennedyKM. Testamentary capacity: a practical guide to assessment of ability to make a valid will. J Forensic Leg Med. 2012;19(4):191–195. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2011.12.029.
26.
GutheilT. Common pitfalls in the evaluation of testamentary capacity. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007;35(4):514–517.
27.
PeisahCFinkelKShulmanP. The wills of older people: risk factors for undue influence. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(1):7–15. doi:10.1017/S1041610208008120.
28.
JacobyR. Ethical and legal aspects of dementia. Psychiatry. 2007;6(12):508–510. doi:10.1016/j.mppsy.2007.09.008.
29.
PeisahCLuxenbergJLiptzinBWandAPShulmanKFinkelS. Deathbed wills: assessing testamentary capacity in the dying patient. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(2):209–216.
30.
SousaLSimõesMFirminoHPeisahC. Financial and testamentary capacity evaluations: procedures and assessment instruments underneath a functional approach. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(2):217–228. doi:10.1017/S1041610213001828.
31.
Millán-CalentiJCTubíoJPita-FernándezSRochetteSLorenzoTMasedaA. Cognitive impairment as predictor of functional dependence in an elderly sample. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;54(1):197–201. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2011.02.010.
32.
World Health Organization, eds. Active Ageing: A Police Framework. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
33.
RazaniJBayanSFunesC. Patterns of deficits in daily functioning and cognitive performance of patients with Alzheimer disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2011;24(1):23–32. doi:10.1177/0891988710390812.
BoylePAYuLWilsonRSGambleKBuchmanASBennettDA. Poor decision making is a consequence of cognitive decline among older persons without Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43647. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043647.
36.
MoyeJMarsonDEdelsteinB. Assessment of capacity in an aging society. Am Psychol. 2013;68(3):158–171. doi:10.1037/a0032159.
37.
MarsonDHuthwaiteJHerbertK. Testamentary capacity and undue influence in the elderly: a jurisprudent therapy perspective. Law Psychol Rev. 2004;28:71–96.
38.
American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging—American Psychological Association—National College of Probate Judges: Judicial determination of capacity of older adults in guardianship proceedings: Handbook of judges. Washington, DC: American Bar Association and the American Psychological Association; 2006.
39.
PurserK. Assessing testamentary capacity in the 21st century: is banks v Goodfellow still relevant?UNSW Law J. 2015;38(3):854–879.
40.
American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging—American Psychological Association: Assessment of older adults with diminished capacity. A handbook for psychologists. Washington, DC: American Bar Association/American Psychological Association; 2008.
41.
ADM Project Team Quality Improvement Division. Assisted decision-making (capacity) Act 2015. A Guide For Health And Social Care Professionals. Ireland: Ireland's Health Service; 2017.
42.
MobergPRickJ. Decision-making capacity and competency in the elderly: a clinical and neuropsychological perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23(5):403–413.
43.
MarsonDCSawrieSMSnyderS. Assessing financial capacity in patients with Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2000;57(6):877–884.
44.
MarsonDC. Loss of financial competency in dementia: conceptual and empirical approaches. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Special Issue: Competency and dementia in later life. 2001;8(3):164–181.
45.
CramerKTuokkoHAMateerCAHultschDF. Measuring awareness of financial skills: reliability and validity of a new measure. Aging Ment Health. 2004;8(2):161–171. doi:10.1080/13607860410001649581.
46.
RoyallDRMahurinRKGrayKF. Bedside assessment of executive cognitive impairment: the executive interview. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(12):1221–1226.
47.
JonesRHoldenT. A guide to assessing decision-making capacity. Clev Clin J Med. 2004;71(12):971–975.
48.
FeinbergLFWhitlatchCJ. Are persons with cognitive impairment able to state consistent choices?Gerontologist. 2001;41(3):374–382.
49.
PeisahCShulmanKI. Testamentary capacity, in civil capacities. In: DemakisGJ, ed. Clinical Neuropsychology: Research Findings and Practical Applications. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2012:5–120.
50.
PeisahC. Reflections on changes in defining testamentary capacity. Int Psychogeriatr. 2005;17(4):709–712. doi:10.1017/S1041610205002875.
51.
ShulmanKPeisahCJacobyRHeinikJFinkelS. Contemporaneous assessment of testamentary capacity. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(3):433–439. doi:10.1017/S1041610209008874.
52.
SabatSR. Capacity for decision-making in Alzheimer’s disease: selfhood, positioning and semiotic people. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39(11-12):1030–1035. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01722.x.
53.
ShulmanKHullIDeKovenSAmodeoSMainlandBJHerrmannN. Cognitive fluctuations and the lucid interval in dementia: implications for testamentary capacity. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015;43(3):287–292.
SparJEGarbAS. Assessing competency to make a will. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149(2):169–174. doi:10.1176/ajp.149.2.169.
56.
AppelbaumPSGuthellTG, eds. Clinical Handbook of Psychiatry and the Law. Baltimore, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins; 1991.
57.
Decision-Making Capacity in Mental Health: Exploratory Research into the Views of People with Personal Experience. Ireland: Amnesty International Ireland; 2009:1–63.
58.
RothMTymEMountjoiCQ. CAMDEX. A standardised instrument for the diagnosis of mental disorder in the elderly with a special reference to the early detection of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1986;149:698–709.
59.
DefantiCATiezziAGaspariniM. Ethical questions in the treatment of subjects with dementia. Part I. Respecting autonomy: awareness, competence and behavioural disorders. Neurol Sci. 2007;28(4):216–231. doi:10.1007/s10072-006-0825-x.
60.
FontanaPDagninoFCocitoLBalestrinoM. Handwriting as a gauge of cognitive status: a novel forensic tool for posthumous evaluation of testamentary capacity. Neurol Sci. 2008;29(4):257–261. doi:10.1007/s10072-008-0977-3.
61.
EdelsteinB. Challenges in the assessment of decision-making capacity. J Aging Stud. 2000;14:423–437. doi:10.1016/S0890-4065(00)80006-7.
62.
JanofskyJMcCarthyRFolsteinM. The Hopkins competency assessment test: a brief method for evaluating patients’ capacity to give informed consent. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992;43(2):132–136.
63.
GrissoT, ed. Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Kluwer; 2003.
64.
SousaLVilarMFirminoHSimõesM. Financial capacity assessment instrument (IACFin): development and qualitative study using focus groups. Psychiat Psychol Law. 2015;22(4):571–585.
65.
PattersonTLMausbachBT. Measurement of functional capacity: a new approach to understanding functional differences and real-world behavioural adaptation in those with mental illness. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:139–154. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131339.
66.
BassettSS. Attention: neuropsychological predictor of competency in Alzheimer’s disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1999;12(4):200–205. doi:10.1177/089198879901200406.
67.
MarsonDIngramKCodyHHarrellL. Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer’s disease under different legal standards. Arch Neurol. 1995;52(10):949–954.
68.
Handbook for Lawyers. Assessment of Older Adults with Diminished Capacities. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging and American Psychological Association; 2005.
