Research estimates that a significant percentage of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) experience functional difficulties. In addition to reduced accuracy on measures of everyday function, cross-sectional research has demonstrated that speed of performing instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) is slowed in individuals with MCI. The present study investigated whether baseline and longitudinal changes in speed and accuracy of IADL performance differed between persons with MCI and cognitively normal peers.
Design:
Linear mixed models were used to estimate the group differences in longitudinal performance on measures of IADLs.
Setting:
Assessments were conducted at university and medical research centers.
Participants:
The sample consisted of 80 participants with MCI and 80 control participants who were enrolled in the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center’s Measuring Independent Living in the Elderly Study.
Measurements:
Instrumental activities of daily living speed and accuracy were directly assessed using selected domains of the Financial Capacity Instrument, the Timed IADL assessment, and driving-related assessments (Useful Field of View, Road Sign Test).
Results:
Individuals with MCI performed worse on speed and accuracy measures of IADLs in comparison to cognitively normal peers and demonstrated significantly steeper rates of decline over three years in either speed or accuracy in all domains assessed.
Conclusion:
Both speed and accuracy of performance on measures of IADL are valuable indices for early detection of functional change in MCI. The performance pattern may reflect a trade-off between speed and accuracy that can guide clinical recommendations for maintaining patient independence.
LangaKMLevineDA. The diagnosis and management of mild cognitive impairment: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014;312(23):2551–2561. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.13806.
2.
TuokkoHMorrisCEbertP. Mild cognitive impairment and everyday functioning in older adults. Neurocase. 2005;11(1):40–47.
3.
FariasSTMungasDReedBRHarveyDCahn-WeinerDDecarliC. MCI is associated with deficits in everyday functioning. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006;20(4):217–223.
4.
PeresKChrysostomeVFabrigouleCOrgogozoJMDartiguesJFBarberger-GateauP. Restriction in complex activities of daily living in MCI: impact on outcome. Neurology. 2006;67(3):461–466.
5.
OkonkwoOGriffithHRBelueK. Medical decision-making capacity in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2007;69(15):1528–1535.
6.
GoldbergTEKoppelJKeehlisenL. Performance-based measures of everyday function in mild cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(7):845–853.
7.
GauthierSGelinasIGauthierL. Functional disability in Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9(suppl 1):163–165.
8.
Schmitter-EdgecombeMWooEGreeleyDR. Characterizing multiple memory deficits and their relation to everyday functioning in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology. 2009;23(2):168–177.
9.
WadleyVGOkonkwoOCroweMRoss-MeadowsLA. Mild cognitive impairment and everyday function: evidence of reduced speed in performing instrumental activities of daily living. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;16(5):416–424. doi:10.1097/JGP.0b013e31816b7303.
10.
PereiraFSYassudaMSOliveiraAM. Profiles of functional deficits in mild cognitive impairment and dementia: benefits from objective measurement. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010;16(2):297–305.
11.
GriffithHRBelueKSicolaA: Impaired financial abilities in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2003;60(3):449–457.
12.
SherodMGGriffithHRCopelandJ. Neurocognitive predictors of financial capacity across the dementia spectrum: normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009;15(2):258–267. doi:10.1017/S1355617709090365.
WadleyVGCroweMMarsiskeM. Changes in everyday function among individuals with psychometrically defined mild cognitive impairment in the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(8):1192–1198.
15.
TriebelKLMartinRGriffithHR. Declining financial capacity in mild cognitive impairment: a 1-year longitudinal study. Neurology. 2009;73(12):928–934. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b87971.
16.
TabertMHAlbertSMBorukhova-MilovL. Functional deficits in patients with mild cognitive impairment: prediction of AD. Neurology. 2002;58(5):758–764.
17.
JekelKDamianMWattmoC. Mild cognitive impairment and deficits in instrumental activities of daily living: a systematic review. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7(1):17. doi:10.1186/s13195-015-0099-0.
18.
OkonkwoOCWadleyVGGriffithHR. Awareness of deficits in financial abilities in patients with mild cognitive impairment: going beyond self-informant discrepancy. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;16(8):650–659.
19.
AlbertSMMichaelsKPadillaM. Functional significance of mild cognitive impairment in elderly patients without a dementia diagnosis. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999;7(3):213–220.
FerrisFLKassoffABresnickGH. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94(1):91–96.
24.
MarsonDCSawrieSMSnyderS. Assessing financial capacity in patients with Alzheimer disease: a conceptual model and prototype instrument. Arch Neurol. 2000;57(6):877–884.
25.
OkonkwoOWadleyVGGriffithHRBallKMarsonDC. Cognitive correlates of financial abilities in mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(11):1745–1750.
26.
OwsleyCSloaneMMcGwinGJrBallK. Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: relationship to cognitive function and everyday performance assessments in older adults. Gerontology. 2002;48(4):254–265.
27.
BallKOwsleyC. The useful field of view test: a new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. J Am Optom Assoc. 1993;64(1):71–79.
28.
BallKOwsleyC. Increasing mobility and reducing accidents of older drivers. In: SchaieKWPietruchaM, eds. Mobility and Transportation in the Elderly. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co Inc; 2000:213–251.
29.
OwsleyCBallKMcGwinGJr. Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. JAMA. 1998;279(14):1083–1088.
30.
EdwardsJDVanceDEWadleyVGCissellGMRoenkerDLBallKK. Reliability and validity of useful field of view test scores as administered by personal computer. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;27(5):529–543.
31.
WoodJMChaparroALacherezPHicksonL. Useful field of view predicts driving in the presence of distracters. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(4):373–381.
32.
WillisSLTennstedtSLMarsiskeM; ACTIVE Study Group. Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA. 2006;296(23):2805–2814. doi:10.1001/jama.296.23.2805.
33.
LairdNMWareJH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982;38(4):963–974.
34.
DutilhGWagenmakersEJVisserIvan der MaasHL. A phase transition model for the speed-accuracy trade-off in response time experiments. Cogn Sci. 2011;35(2):211–250. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01147.x.
35.
ChenBPeronaP. Speed versus accuracy in visual search: optimal performance and neural architecture. J Vis. 2015;15(16):9. doi:10.1167/15.16.9.
36.
BurnsAZaudigM. Mild cognitive impairment in older people. Lancet. 2016;360(9349):1963–1965.
37.
RossLAEdwardsJDO’ConnorMLBallKKWadleyVGVanceDE. The transfer of cognitive speed of processing training to older adults’ driving mobility across 5 Years. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016;71(1):89–97. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbv022.
38.
Schmitter-EdgecombeMParseyCM. Assessment of functional change and cognitive correlates in the progression from healthy cognitive aging to dementia. Neuropsychology. 2015;28(6):881–893. doi:10.1037/neu0000109.
39.
SeelyeAMSchmitter-EdgecombeMCookDJ. Naturalistic assessment of everyday activities and prompting technologies in mild cognitive impairment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2013;19(4):442–452. doi:10.1017/S135561771200149X.
