Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative condition in which the most prominent clinical feature is language difficulties. Other cognitive domains have been described to remain unaffected at the early stages of the disease and, therefore, excluded from diagnostic criteria. However, we show in this article that executive function (EF) disorders may be present in the 3 variants (nonfluent/agrammatic, logopenic, and semantic) of PPA. We also illustrate changes in language and EF by means of a 3-year behavioral and neuroimaging longitudinal study of a patient suffering from the semantic variant of PPA. This review provides an update on current knowledge of PPA, suggesting that dysexecutive symptoms may be encountered in the 3 PPA variants, in their early phases and/or in more advanced stages, when atrophy extends to adjacent brain areas.
KnibbJAXuerebJHPattersonKHodgesJR. Clinical and pathological characterization of progressive aphasia. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(1):156–165.
2.
NearyDSnowdenJSGustafsonL. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 1998;51(6):1546–1554.
3.
MesulamMMWienekeCThompsonCRogalskiEWeintraubS. Quantitative classification of primary progressive aphasia at early and mild impairment stages. Brain. 2012;135(pt 5):1537–1553.
4.
Gorno-TempiniMLHillisAEWeintraubS. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011;76(11):1006–1014.
5.
Gorno-TempiniMLDronkersNFRankinKP. Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Ann Neurol. 2004;55(3):335–346.
6.
RohrerJDRossorMNWarrenJD. Alzheimer’s pathology in primary progressive aphasia. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(4):744–752.
7.
HarrisJMGallCThompsonJC. Classification and pathology of primary progressive aphasia. Neurology. 2013;81(21):1832–1839.
8.
HodgesJRPattersonK. Semantic dementia: a unique clinicopathological syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(11):1004–1014.
9.
RohrerJDWarrenJDModatM. Patterns of cortical thinning in the language variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2009;72(18):1562–1569.
10.
BozeatSGregoryCALambon RalphMAHodgesJR. Which neuropsychiatric and behavioural features distinguish frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease?J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatry. 2000;69(2):178–186.
11.
RohrerJDRossorMNWarrenJD. Syndromes of nonfluent primary progressive aphasia: a clinical and neurolinguistic analysis. Neurology. 2010;75(7):603–610.
12.
LezakMD. Neuropsychological Assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
13.
MiyakeAFriedmanNPEmersonMJWitzkiAHHowerterAWagerTD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41(1):49–100.
14.
BaddeleyADHitchGJ. Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology. 1994;8(4):485–493.
15.
KruegerCELaluzVRosenHJNeuhausJMMillerBLKramerJH. Double dissociation in the anatomy of socioemotional disinhibition and executive functioning in dementia. Neuropsychology. 2011;25(2):249–259.
16.
MiyakeAFriedmanNP. The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: four general conclusions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21(1):8–14.
17.
RoyallDRLauterbachECCummingsJL. Executive control function: a review of its promise and challenges for clinical research. A report from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002;14(4):377–405.
18.
BrookesRLHannesdottirKMarkusHSMorrisRG. Lack of awareness of neuropsychological deficit in cerebral small vessel disease: the relationship with executive and episodic memory functions. J Neuropsychol. 2013;7(1):19–28.
19.
GaleoneFPappalardoSChieffiSIavaroneACarlomagnoS. Anosognosia for memory deficit in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;26(7):695–701.
20.
ReinebergAEAndrews-HannaJRDepueBEFriedmanNPBanichMT. Resting-state networks predict individual differences in common and specific aspects of executive function. NeuroImage. 2015;104:69–78.
21.
GazzaleyAD’EspositoM. Unifying prefrontal cortex function: executive control, neural networks, and top-down modulation. In: MillerBLCummingsJL, eds. The Human Frontal Lobes. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2007:187–206.
22.
BonelliRMCummingsJL. Frontal-subcortical circuitry and behavior. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2007;9(2):141–151.
23.
KerteszAMartinez-LagePDavidsonWMunozDG. The corticobasal degeneration syndrome overlaps progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2000;55(9):1368–1375.
24.
KerteszA. Pick Complex: an integrative approach to frontotemporal dementia: primary progressive aphasia, corticobasal degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurologist. 2003;9(6):311–317.
25.
LibonDJXieSXWangX. Neuropsychological decline in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a longitudinal analysis. Neuropsychology. 2009;23(3):337–346.
26.
AshSMoorePVeselyL. Non-fluent speech in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Neuroling. 2009;22(4):370–383.
27.
HodgesJRPattersonK. Nonfluent progressive aphasia and semantic dementia: a comparative neuropsychological study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996;2(6):511–524.
28.
HenryJDCrawfordJRPhillipsLH. Verbal fluency performance in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(9):1212–1222.
29.
ZakzanisKK. The neuropsychological signature of primary progressive aphasia. Brain Lang. 1999;70(1):70–85.
30.
KnibbJAWoollamsAMHodgesJRPattersonK. Making sense of progressive non-fluent aphasia: an analysis of conversational speech. Brain. 2009;132(pt 10):2734–2746.
31.
NestorPJGrahamNLFryerTDWilliamsGBPattersonKHodgesJR. Progressive non-fluent aphasia is associated with hypometabolism centred on the left anterior insula. Brain. 2003;126(pt 11):2406–2418.
32.
Heidler-GaryJGottesmanRNewhartMChangSKenLHillisAE. Utility of behavioral versus cognitive measures in differentiating between subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cog Disord. 2007;23(3):184–193.
33.
DelisDCKaplanEKramerJH. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. London, UK: The Psychological Corporation; 2001.
34.
ButtsAMMachuldaMMDuffyJRStrandEAWhitwellJLJosephsKA. Neuropsychological profiles differ among the three variants of primary progressive aphasia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015;21(6):429–435.
35.
PriceCCGrossmanM. Verb agreements during on-line sentence processing in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Brain Lang. 2005;94(2):217–232.
36.
PeelleJETroianiVGeeJ. Sentence comprehension and voxel-based morphometry in progressive nonfluent aphasia, semantic dementia, and nonaphasic frontotemporal dementia. J Neuroling. 2008;21(5):418–432.
37.
BrambatiSMAmiciSRacineCA. Longitudinal gray matter contraction in three variants of primary progressive aphasia: a tensor-based morphometry study. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;8:345–355.
38.
RohrerJDWarrenJD. Phenomenology and anatomy of abnormal behaviours in primary progressive aphasia. J Neurol Sci. 2010;293(1-2):35–38.
39.
RosenHJAllisonSCOgarJM. Behavioral features in semantic dementia vs other forms of progressive aphasias. Neurology. 2006;67(10):1752–1756.
40.
Van LangenhoveTLeytonCEPiguetOHodgesJR. Comparing longitudinal behavior changes in the primary progressive aphasias. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;53(3):1033–1042.
LeytonCEHodgesJRMcLeanCAKrilJJPiguetOBallardKJ. Is the logopenic-variant of primary progressive aphasia a unitary disorder?Cortex. 2015;67:122–133.
43.
LouwersheimerEKeulenMASteenwijkMD. Heterogeneous language profiles in patients with primary progressive aphasia due to Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer Dis. 2016;51(2):581–590.
44.
SajjadiSAPattersonKNestorPJ. Logopenic, mixed, or Alzheimer-related aphasia?Neurology. 2014;82(13):1127–1131.
45.
Gorno-TempiniMLBrambatiSMGinexV. The logopenic/phonological variant of primary progressive aphasia. Neurology. 2008;71(16):1227–1234.
46.
RohrerJDRidgwayGRCrutchSJ. Progressive logopenic/phonological aphasia: erosion of the language network. NeuroImage. 2010;49(1):984–993.
47.
MagninEChopardGFerreiraS. Initial neuropsychological profile of a series of 20 patients with logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia. J Alzheimer Dis. 2013;36(4):799–808.
48.
TeichmannMKasABoutetC. Deciphering logopenic primary progressive aphasia: a clinical, imaging and biomarker investigation. Brain. 2013;136(pt 11):3474–3488.
49.
WhitwellJLDuffyJRStrandEA. Clinical and neuroimaging biomarkers of amyloid-negative logopenic primary progressive aphasia. Brain Lang. 2015;142:45–53.
50.
LeytonCEHsiehSMioshiEHodgesJR. Cognitive decline in logopenic aphasia: more than losing words. Neurology. 2013;80(10):897–903.
51.
HodgesJRPattersonKWardR. The differentiation of semantic dementia and frontal lobe dementia (temporal and frontal variants of frontotemporal dementia) from early Alzheimer’s disease: a comparative neuropsychological study. Neuropsychology. 1999;13(1):31–40.
52.
LibonDJMcMillanCGunawardenaD. Neurocognitive contributions to verbal fluency deficits in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2009;73(7):535–542.
53.
RogersTTIvanoiuAPattersonKHodgesJR. Semantic memory in Alzheimer’s disease and the frontotemporal dementias: a longitudinal study of 236 patients. Neuropsychology. 2006;20(3):319–335.
54.
IrishMHodgesJRPiguetO. Right anterior temporal lobe dysfunction underlies theory of mind impairments in semantic dementia. Brain. 2014;137(pt 4):1241–1253.
55.
PerryRJHodgesJR. Differentiating frontal and temporal variant frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2000;54(12):2277–2284.
56.
DesgrangesBMatuszewskiVPiolinoP. Anatomical and functional alterations in semantic dementia: a voxel-based MRI and PET study. Neurobiol Aging. 2007;28(12):1904–1913.
57.
KerteszAJessoSHarciarekMBlairMMcMonagleP. What is semantic dementia?: a cohort study of diagnostic features and clinical boundaries. Arch Neurol. 2010;67(4):483–489.
58.
SmitsLLvan HartenACPijnenburgYAL. Trajectories of cognitive decline in different types of dementia. Psychol Med. 2015;45(5):1051–1059.
59.
SnowdenJSBathgateDVarmaABlackshawAGibbonsZCNearyD. Distinct behavioural profiles in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(3):323–332.
60.
D’AnnaLMesulamMMThiebaut de SchottenM. Frontotemporal networks and behavioral symptoms in primary progressive aphasia. Neurology. 2016;86(15):1393–1399.
61.
NasreddineZSPhillipsNABedirianV. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
62.
WechslerD. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
ReyA. Test de la Figure complexe de Rey. Paris, France: Les Éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée; 1960.
65.
GoldenJC. Stroop Color and Word Test. Chicago, IL: Stoelting Co; 1978.
66.
ReitanRM. Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills. 1958;8(3):271–276.
67.
JoanetteYSkaBFerréPCôtéH. MEC: Protocole Montréal d’Évaluation de la Communication. Isbergues, FR: Ortho Edition; 2004.
68.
HowardDPattersonK. The Pyramids and Palm Trees Test: A Test for Semantic Access from Words and Pictures. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1992.
69.
MacoirJGauthierCJeanCPotvinO. BECLA, a new assessment battery for acquired deficits of language: normative data from Quebec-French healthy younger and older adults. J Neurol Sci. 2016;361:220–228.
70.
KaplanEGoodglassHWeintraubS. The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1983.
71.
BarbeauETramoniEJoubertSManciniJCeccaldiMPoncetM. Evaluation de la mémoire de reconnaissance visuelle: normalisation d’une nouvelle épreuve en choix forcé (DMS48) et utilité en neuropsychologie clinique. In: Van der LindenM, ed. L’évaluation des troubles de la mémoire. Marseille, France: Solal; 2004:85–101.
72.
WhitwellJLAndersonVMScahillRIRossorMNFoxNC. Longitudinal patterns of regional change on volumetric MRI in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004;17(4):307–310.
ThompsonHERobsonHLambon RalphMAJefferiesE. Varieties of semantic ‘access’ deficit in Wernicke’s aphasia and semantic aphasia. Brain. 2015;138(pt 12):3776–3792.
75.
MartinRAllenC. A disorder of executive function and its role in language processing. Semin Speech Lang. 2008;29(3):201–210.
76.
FridrikssonJNettlesCDavisMMorrowLMontgomeryA. Functional communication and executive function in aphasia. Clin Ling Phon. 2006;20(6):401–410.
77.
MiyakeACarpenterPAJustMA. A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1994;11(6):671–717.
78.
BierNMacoirJGagnonLVan der LindenMLouveauxSDesrosiersJ. Known, lost, and recovered: efficacy of formal-semantic therapy and spaced retrieval method in a case of semantic dementia. Aphasiology. 2009;23(2):210–235.
79.
MacoirJLeroyMRouthierSAuclair-OuelletNHoudeMLaforceRJr. Improving verb anomia in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia: the effectiveness of a semantic-phonological cueing treatment. Neurocase. 2015;21(4):448–456.
80.
LouisMEspesserRReyVDaffaureVCristoADHabibM. Intensive training of phonological skills in progressive aphasia: a model of brain plasticity in neurodegenerative disease. Brain Cogn. 2001;46(1-2):197–201.
81.
FarrajotaLMarutaCMarocoJMartinsIPGuerreiroMde MendonçaA. Speech therapy in primary progressive aphasia: a pilot study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;2(1):321–331.
82.
FillinghamJKSageKLambon RalphMA. The treatment of anomia using errorless learning. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2006;16(2):129–154.
83.
Lambon RalphMASnellCFillinghamJKConroyPSageK. Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: both language and cognitive status are key predictors. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20(2):289–305.
84.
RobertsonIHMurreJM. Rehabilitation of brain damage: brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(5):544–575.
85.
RouthierSMacoirJJacquesS. From smartphone to external semantic memory device: the use of new technologies to compensate for semantic deficits. Nonpharmacol Ther Dement. 2012;2(2):81–99.
86.
BierNPaquetteGMacoirJ. Smartphone for smart living: using new technologies to cope with everyday limitations in semantic dementia[Published online October 19, 2015]. Neuropsychol Rehabil. doi:10.1080/09602011.2015.1094395.
87.
SalatDHBucknerRLSnyderAZ. Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14(7):721–730.
88.
DuffyJRStrandEAClarkHMachuldaMWhitwellJLJosephsKA. Primary progressive apraxia of speech: clinical features and acoustic and neurologic correlates. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(2):88–100.
