Cognitive impairment is a well-recognized risk factor for delirium. Our goal was to determine whether the level of cognitive performance across the nondemented cognitive ability spectrum is correlated with delirium risk and to gauge the importance of cognition relative to other known risk factors for delirium.
Methods:
The Successful Aging after Elective Surgery study enrolled 566 adults aged ≥70 years scheduled for major surgery. Patients were assessed preoperatively and daily during hospitalization for the occurrence of delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method. Cognitive function was assessed preoperatively with an 11-test neuropsychological battery combined into a composite score for general cognitive performance (GCP). We examined the risk for delirium attributable to GCP, as well as demographic factors, vocabulary ability, and informant-rated cognitive decline, and compared the strength of association with risk factors identified in a previously published delirium prediction rule for delirium.
Results:
Delirium occurred in 135 (24%) patients. Lower GCP score was strongly and linearly predictive of delirium risk (relative risk = 2.0 per each half standard deviation difference in GCP score, 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.5). This effect was not attenuated by statistical adjustment for demographics, vocabulary ability, and informant-rated cognitive decline. The effect was stronger than, and largely independent from, both standard delirium risk factors and comorbidity.
Conclusion:
Risk of delirium is linearly and strongly related to presurgical cognitive performance level even at levels above the population median, which would be considered unimpaired.
InouyeSKWestendorpRGSaczynskiJS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014;383(9920):911–922.
2.
van MeenenLCCvan MeenenDMPde RooijSEter RietG. Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(12):2383–2390.
3.
AshfordJW. Screening for memory disorders, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Health. 2008;4(4):399–432.
4.
InouyeSKViscoliCMHorwitzRIHurstLDTinettiME. A predictive model for delirium in hospitalized elderly medical patients based on admission characteristics. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(6):474–481.
5.
KalisvaartKJVreeswijkRDe JongheJFVan Der PloegTVan GoolWAEikelenboomP. Risk factors and prediction of postoperative delirium in elderly hip-surgery patients: implementation and validation of a medical risk factor model. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(5):817–822.
6.
SchmittEMMarcantonioERAlsopDC. Novel risk markers and long-term outcomes of delirium: the Successful Aging after Elective Surgery (SAGES) study design and methods. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(9):818 e811–e810.
7.
SchmittEInouyeSJonesR. The Successful Aging after Elective Surgery (SAGES) study: cohort description and data quality procedures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;63(12):2463–2471.
8.
SimonSEBergmannMAJonesRNMurphyKMOravEJMarcantonioER. Reliability of a structured assessment for nonclinicians to detect delirium among new admissions to postacute care. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006;7(7):412–415.
9.
AlbertMSLevkoffSEReillyC. The Delirium Symptom Interview: an interview for the detection of delirium symptoms in hospitalized patients. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1992;5(1):14–21.
10.
InouyeSKvan DyckCHAlessiCABalkinSSiegalAPHorwitzRI. Clarifying confusion: the Confusion Assessment Method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(12):941–948.
11.
InouyeSKLeo-SummersLZhangYBogardusSTJr.LeslieDLAgostiniJV. A chart-based method for identification of delirium: validation compared with interviewer ratings using the Confusion Assessment Method. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(2):312–318.
12.
SaczynskiJSKosarCMXuG. A tale of two methods: chart and interview methods for identifying delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(3):518–524.
13.
GrossALJonesRNFongTGTommetDInouyeSK. Calibration and validation of an innovative approach for estimating general cognitive performance. Neuroepidemiology. 2014;42(3):144–153.
14.
FongTHshiehTWongB. Neuropsychological profiles of an elderly cohort undergoing elective surgery and the relationship of cognitive performance with delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;62(3):518–524.
15.
DelisDC. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2001.
16.
WechslerD. Wechsler Test of Adult Reading. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2001.
17.
BentonAHamsherK. Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa; 1976.
18.
GoodglassHKaplanE. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. 2nd ed. Malvern, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1983.
19.
RandolphC. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1998.
20.
BrandtJ. The Hopkins verbal learning test: development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms. Clin Neuropsychol. 1991;5(2):125–142.
21.
TrenerryMR. Visual Search and Attention Test: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1990.
22.
BakerFBKimS-H. Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2004.
23.
FolsteinMFFolsteinSEMcHughPR. ‘Mini-mental state.’ A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
24.
WechslerD. Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation; 1955.
25.
NelsonH. National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test Manual. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1982.
26.
YatesAJ. The use of vocabulary in the measurement of intellectual deterioration—a review. J Ment Sci. 1956;102(429):409–440.
27.
JormAScottRCullenJMacKinnonA. Performance of the informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE) as a screening test for dementia. Psychol Med. 1991;21(3):785–790.
28.
KnausWADraperEAWagnerDPZimmermanJE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–829.
29.
SeymourDHenschkePCapeRCampbellA. Acute confusional states and dementia in the elderly: the role of dehydration/volume depletion, physical illness and age. Age Ageing. 1980;9(3):137–146.
30.
TengELChuiHC. The modified mini-mental state (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48(8):314–318.
31.
CharlsonMEPompeiPAlesKLMacKenzieCR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.
32.
GelmanA. Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Stat Med. 2008;27(15):2865.
33.
BudescuDV. Dominance analysis: a new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychol Bull. 1993;114(3):542.
34.
AzenRTraxelN. Using dominance analysis to determine predictor importance in logistic regression. J Educ Behav Stat. 2009;34(3):319–347.
35.
LuchmanJN. DOMIN: Stata module to conduct dominance analysis [software]. Boston College Department of Economics; 2013. Web site. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457629.html. Updated May 04, 2015.
36.
HastieTTibshiraniRFriedmanJ. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2013.
37.
GenelettiSBestNToledanoMElliottPRichardsonS. Uncovering selection bias in case–control studies using Bayesian post-stratification. Stat Med. 2013;32(15):2555–2570.
38.
McFaddenD.Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: ZarembkaP, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press; 1973:105–142.
39.
Del SerTHachinskiVMerskeyHMunozDG. An autopsy-verified study of the effect of education on degenerative dementia. Brain. 1999;122(pt 12):2309–2319.
40.
Pascual-LeoneAAmediAFregniFMerabetL. The plastic human brain cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:377–401.
41.
SperlingRAAisenPSBeckettLA. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association workgroup. Alzheimer’s and Dement. 2011;7(3):280–292.
42.
Pascual-LeoneAFreitasCObermanL. Characterizing brain cortical plasticity and network dynamics across the age-span in health and disease with TMS-EEG and TMS-fMRI. Brain Topogr. 2011;24(3-4):302–315.
43.
FreitasCPerezJKnobelM. Changes in cortical plasticity across the lifespan. Front Aging Neurosci. 2011;3:5.
44.
ChristensenHAnsteyKJLeachLSMackinnonAJ. Intelligence, education, and the brain reserve hypothesis. In: CraikFSalthouseT, eds. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2008:133–188.
45.
SternY. Cognitive reserve: implications for assessment and intervention. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 2013;65(2):49–54.
46.
HarrisonSLSajjadABramerWMIkramMATiemeierHStephanBC. Exploring strategies to operationalize cognitive reserve: a systematic review of reviews. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(3):253–264.
47.
SatzPColeMAHardyDJRassovskyY. Brain and cognitive reserve: mediator(s) and construct validity, a critique. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011;33(1):121–130.
