Previous findings that older drivers engage in strategic self-regulatory behaviors to minimize perceived safety risks are primarily based on survey reports rather than actual behavior. This study analyzed in-car video recording of naturalistic driving of 18 patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and 20 age-matched controls in order to (1) characterize self-regulatory behaviors engaged by older drivers and (2) assess how behaviors change with cognitive impairment. Only participants who were rated “safe” on a prior standardized road test were selected for this study. Both groups drove primarily in environments that minimized the demands on driving skill and that incurred the least risk for involvement in major crashes. Patients with AD displayed further restrictions of driving behavior beyond those of healthy elderly individuals, suggesting additional regulation on the basis of cognitive status. These data provide critical empirical support for findings from previous survey studies indicating an overall reduction in driving mobility among older drivers with cognitive impairment.
DonorfioLKMD’AmbrosiaLACoughlinJFMohydeM. To drive or not to drive, that isn’t the question-the meaning of self-regulation among older drivers. J Safety Res. 2009;40(3):221–226.
3.
EberhardJW. Safe mobility for people with Alzheimer disease: a commentary. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11(suppl 1):76–77.
4.
CarrDBOttBR. The older adult driver with cognitive impairment: “It's a very frustrating life”. JAMA. 2010;303(16):1632–1641.
KentRHenaryBMatsuokaF.On the fatal crash experience of older drivers. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2005;49:371–391.
7.
CarrDBSchwartzbergJGManningLSempekJ. Physician’s Guide to Assessing and Counseling Older Drivers, 2nd Edition. Washington, DC: NHTSA;2010.
8.
MolnarLJEbyDW. The relationship between self-regulation and driving-related abilities in older drivers: an exploratory study. Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9(4):314–319.
9.
RossLAClayOJEdwardsJDDo older drivers at-risk for crashes modify their driving over time?J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009;64(2):163–170.
10.
GwytherHHollandC. The effect of age, gender and attitudes on self-regulation in driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;45:19–28.
11.
BaldockMRMathiasJLMcLeanAJBerndtA. Self-regulation of driving and its relationship to driving ability among older adults. Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38(5):1038–1045.
12.
GalloJJRebokGWLesikarSE. The driving habits of adults aged 60 years and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(3):335–341.
13.
KostyniukLPMolnarLJ. Self-regulatory driving practices among older adults: health, age, and sex effects. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40(4):1576–1580.
14.
D’AmbrosioLADonorfioLKMCoughlinJFMohydeMMeyerJ. Gender differences in self-regulation patterns and attitudes toward driving among older adults. J Women Aging. 2008;20(3-4):265–282.
15.
AckermanMLCroweMVanceDEWadleyVGOwsleyCBallKK. The impact of feedback on self-rated driving ability and driving self-regulation among older drivers. The Gerontologist. 2010;51(3):367–378.
16.
Hakamies-BlomqvistLWahlstromB. Why do older drivers give up driving?Accid Anal Prev. 1998;30(3):305–312.
17.
DonorfioLKMD’AmbrosioLACoughlinJFFordyceTA. Health, safety, self-regulation and the older driver: It’s not just a matter of age. J Safety Res. 2008;39(6):555–561.
18.
UnsworthCAWellYBrowningCThomasSAKendigH.To continue, modify or relinquish driving: Findings from a longitudinal study of healthy ageing. Gerontology. 2007;53(6):423–431.
19.
BraitmanKAWilliamsAF. Changes in self-regulatory driving among older drivers over time. Traffic Inj Prev. 2011;12(6):568–575.
20.
LymanJMMcGwinGSimsRV. Factors related to driving difficulty and habits in older drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2001;33(3):413–421.
21.
AnsteyKJWindsorTDLuszczMAAndrewsGR. Predicting driving cessation over 5 years in older adults: psychological well-being and cognitive competence are stronger predictors than physical health. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(1):121–126.
22.
BallKOwsleyCStalveyBRoenkerDLSloaneMEGravesM.Driving avoidance and functional impairment in older drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1998;30(3):313–322.
23.
McGwinGChapmanVOwsleyC. Visual risk factors for driving difficulty among older drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2000;32(6):735–744.
24.
OkonkwoOCCroweMWadleyVGBallK. Visual attention and self-regulation of driving among older adults. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008;20(1):162–173.
25.
O'ConnorMLEdwardsJDWadleyVGCroweM. Changes in mobility among older adults with psychometrically defined mild cognitive impairment. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010;65B(3):306–316.
26.
OkonkwoOCGriffithHRVanceDEMarsonDCBallKKWadleyVG. Awareness of functional difficulties in mild cognitive impairment: A multidomain assessment approach. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(6):978–984.
27.
CotrellVWildK. Longitudinal study of self-imposed driving restrictions and deficit awareness in patients with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1999;13(3):151–156.
28.
RizzoMRobinsonSNealeV.The brain in the wild: tracking human behavior in natural and naturalistic settings. In: ParasuramanRRizzoM, eds. Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007:113–28.
29.
De RaedtRPonjaert-KristoffersenI. Can strategic and tactical compensation reduce crash risk in older drivers?Age Ageing. 2000;29(6):517–521.
30.
BlanchardRAMyersAM. Examination of driving comfort and self-regulatory practices in older adults using in-vehicle devices to assess natural driving patterns. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(4):1213–1219.
31.
BlanchardRAMyersAMPorterMM. Correspondence between self-reported and objective measures of driving exposure and patterns in older drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(2):523–529.
32.
HuebnerKDPorterMMMarshallSC. Validation of an electronic device for measuring driving exposure. Traffic Inj Prev. 2006;7(1):76–80.
33.
MarshallSCWilsonKGMolnarFJMan-Son-HingMStiellIPorterMM. Measurement of driving patterns of older adults using data logging devices with and without global positioning system capability. Traffic Inj Prev. 2007;8(3):260–266.
34.
StuttsJFeaganesJReinfurtDDriver's exposure to distractions in their natural driving environment. Accid Anal Prev. 2005;37(6):1093–1101.
35.
NealeVLDingusTAKlauerSGAn overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings. In: Proceedings—19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; June 6-9, 2005;1–10; Washington, DC.
36.
McKhannGDrachmanDFolsteinMKatzmanRPriceDStadlanEM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984;34(7):939–944.
37.
MorrisJC. Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9(suppl 1):173–176.
38.
FolsteinMFFolsteinSEMcHughPR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res.1975;12(3):189–198.
39.
DavisJDPapandonatosGDMillerLARoad test and naturalistic driving behavior in older adults with and without memory loss: Environment matters. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(11):2056–2062.
40.
OttBRPapadonatosGDDavisJDBarcoPB. Naturalistic validation of an on-road driving test of older drivers. Hum Factors. 2012;54(4):663–674.
41.
OttBRHeindelWCPapandonatosGDA longitudinal study of drivers with Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2008;70(14):1171–1178.
42.
StaplinLGishKWJoyceJ. ‘Low mileage bias’ and related policy implications--a cautionary note. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40(3):1249–1252.
43.
Shua-HaimJRGrossJS. The “co-pilot” driver syndrome. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44(7):815–817.
44.
FoleyDJMasakiKHRossGWWhiteLR, Driving cessation in older men with incident dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(8):928–930.
45.
VrkljanBHPolgarJM. Driving, navigation, and vehicular technology: experiences of older drivers and their co-pilots. Traffic Inj Prev. 2007;8(4):403–410.
46.
HuntLAMurphyCFCarrDDuchekJMBucklesVMorrisJC.Reliability of the Washington university road test. Arch Neurol. 1997;54(6):707–712.
