Cognitive decline in speeded abilities, executive function, and memory is believed to typify normal aging. However, there is significant variability in cognitive function with advanced age and some reports of relatively intact cognitive function among a subset of older individuals. The present study consists of a cluster analysis to examine the patterns of cognitive function in middle-aged and older individuals. Analyses revealed 3 clusters of middle-aged adults, including an intact group, persons with poor motor speed, and a group with reduced executive function. Three clusters were also identified for older adults, including a group with poor executive function, persons with reduced speed performance (attention, executive function, motor), and a group with global cognitive decline. No evidence emerged for a cluster of older adults with intact performance in all domains or with isolated memory deficits. Findings generally support the frontal aging hypothesis and may provide important information about healthy cognitive aging.
Christensen H.What cognitive changes can be expected with normal ageing?Aust NZ J Psychiatry2001;35:768-775.
2.
Singer T, Verhaeghen P, Ghisletta P, et al.The fate of cognition in very old age: Six-year longitudinal findings in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE). Psychol Aging2003;18:318-331.
3.
Goldman W, Morris J.Evidence that age-associated memory impairment is not a normal variant of aging. Alz Dis Associated Dis2001;15:72-79.
4.
Ritchie K, Touchon J, Ledesert B, et al.Establishing the limits and characteristics of normal age-related cognitive decline. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique1997;45:373-381.
5.
Schaie K.The course of adult intellectual development. Am Psychol1994;49:304-313.
6.
Sliwinski M, Buschke H.Cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships among age, cognition, and processing speed. Psychol Aging1999;14:18-33.
7.
Price L, Said K, Haaland K.Age-associated memory impairment of Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol2004;26:531-538.
8.
Mitrushina M, Uchiyama C, Satz P.Heterogeneity of cognitive profiles in normal aging: implications for early manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol1995;17:374-382.
9.
Valdois S, Joanette Y, Poissant A, et al.Heterogeneity in the cognitive profile of normal elderly. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol1990;12:587-596.
10.
Ylikoski R, Ylikoski A, Keskivaara P, et al.Heterogeneity of cognitive profiles in aging: successful aging, normal aging, and individuals at risk for cognitive decline. Eur J Neurol1999;6:645-652.
11.
American Diabetes Association. All About Diabetes-Over-view. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org/about-diabetes.jsp. Retrieved June 9, 2004.
12.
American Heart Association. 2004 Heart and stroke statistical update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 2003.
13.
Cohen R, Moser D, Clark M, et al.Neurocognitive functioning and improvement in quality of life following participation in cardiac rehabilitation. Am J Cardiol1999;83:1374-1378.
14.
Tarbuck A, Paykel E.Effects of major depression on the cognitive function of younger and older subjects. Psychol Med1995;25:285-295.
15.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Mental Health. Depression: a treatable illness (No. 03-5299). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, 2003.
16.
Haan M, Shemanski L, Jagust W, Manolio T.The role of APOE e4 in modulating effects of other risk factors for cognitive decline in elderly persons. JAMA1999;282:40-46.
17.
Gordon E.Integrative neuroscience in psychiatry: The role of a standardized database. Australas Psychiatry2003;11:156-163.
18.
Gordon E.Integrative neuroscience. Neuropsychopharmacology2003;28:52-58.
19.
World Health Organization. Composite international diagnostic interview—version 1.1. Geneva: WHO, 1993.
20.
Paul R, Lawrence J, Williams L, Clark R.Validity of “IntegNeuroTM”: A new automated, computerized and standardized battery of neurocognitive tests. Neuropsychopharmacology, In press.
21.
Williams L, Simms E, Clark C, Paul R.The reproducibility of a standardized and integrated neurophysiological and neuropsychological test battery. Clin Neurophysiol, In press.
22.
Mesulam M.Principles of behavioral neurology. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company, 1985.
23.
Greenwood P.The frontal aging hypothesis evaluated. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2000;6:705-726.
24.
West R.An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychol Bull1996;120:272-292.
25.
Alexander G, Crutcher M.Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends Neurosci1990;13:266-271.
26.
Alexander G, DeLong M, Strick P.Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci1986;9:357-381.
27.
Lichter D, Cummings J.Frontal-subcortical circuits in psychiatric and neurological disorders. New York: Guilford Press, 2001.
28.
Cook I, Leuchter A, Morgan M, Conlee W.Cognitive and physiologic correlates of subclinical structural brain disease in elderly healthy control subjects. Arch Neurol2002;5:1612-1620.
29.
Cook I, Leuchter A, Morgan M, et al.Longitudinal progression of subcortical structural brain disease in normal aging. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry2004;12:190-200.
30.
Mori E.Impact of subcortical ischemic lesions on behavior and cognition. Ann NY Acad Sci2002;977:141-148.
31.
Soderlund H, Nyberg L, Adolfsson R, et al.High prevalence of white matter hyperintensities in normal aging: relation to blood pressure and cognition. Cortex2003;39:1093-1105.
32.
O’Sullivan M, Morris R, Huckstep B, et al.Diffusion tensor MRI correlates with executive dysfunction in patients with ischaemic leukoaraiosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2004;75:441-449.
