This study evaluated the ability to produce and comprehend affective prosody across age groups and compared patterns of impaired performance to deficits observed after focal brain damage. Sixty-nine healthy subjects, ages 22 to 83 years, were given the Aprosodia Battery, a test that distinguishes between affective prosodic processing deficits following rightversus left-brain damage through the use of stimuli with progressively reduced verbal articulatory content. Production of affective prosody, measured by variation in fundamental frequency, was unimpaired in older subjects, whereas comprehension of affective prosody was impaired, particularly for tasks with reduced verbal articulatory content. The pattern of performance across affective comprehension tasks in the older subjects resembled the pattern found after right-brain damage. The results demonstrate age-related loss in comprehension of affective prosody that is most likely due to a processing deficit involving the right hemisphere. (J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2003; 16:44-52)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Lehiste I. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1970.
2.
2. Kent RD, Rosenbeck JC. Prosodic disturbances and neurologic lesion. Brain Lang1982; 15: 259-291.
3.
3. Ross ED, Edmondson JA, Seibert GB, Homan RW. Acoustic analysis of affective prosody during right-sided wada test: a within-subjects verification of the right hemisphere’s role in language. Brain Lang1988; 33: 128-145.
4.
4. Shapiro B, Danly M. The role of the right hemisphere in the control of speech prosody in propositional and affective contexts. Brain Lang1985; 25: 19-36.
5.
5. Van Lancker D, Sidtis JJ. The identification of affective-prosodic stimuli by leftbut not right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain Lang1992; 32: 256-277.
6.
6. Pell M, Baum S. Unilateral brain damage, prosodic comprehension deficits, and the acoustic cues to prosody. Brain Lang1997; 57: 195-214.
7.
7. Ross ED. Affective prosody and the aprosodias. In: Mesulam M, ed. Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000:316-331.
8.
8. Lakshminarayanan K, Ben Shalom D, van Wassenhove V, et al. The effect of spectral manipulations on identification of active and linguistic prosody. Brain Lang. In press.
9.
9. Scherer KR. Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research. Psychol Bull1986; 99: 143-165.
10.
10. Williams CE, Stevens KN. Emotions and speech: some acoustical correlates. J Acoust Soc Am1972; 52: 1238-1250.
11.
11. Tompkins CA, Flowers CR. Perception of emotional intonation by brain-damaged adults: the influence of task processing levels. JSHR1985; 28: 527-538.
12.
12. Borod JC, Cicero BA, Obler LK, et al. Right hemisphere emotional perception: evidence across multiple channels. Neuropsychology1998; 12: 445-458.
13.
13. de Bleser R, Poeck K. Analysis of prosody in spontaneous speech of patients with CV-recurring utterances. Cortex1985; 21: 405-416.
14.
14. Cancelliere AEB, Kertesz A. Lesion localization in acquired deficits of emotional express and comprehension. Brain Cogn1990; 13: 133-147.
15.
15. Ross ED, Thompson RD, Yenkosky J. Lateralization of affective prosody in brain and the callosal integration of hemispheric language functions. Brain Lang1997; 56: 27-54.
16.
16. Schlanger BB, Schlanger P, Gerstmann LJ. The perception of emotionally toned sentences by right hemisphere-damaged and aphasic subjects. Brain Lang1976; 3: 396-403.
17.
17. Seron X, Van der Kaa MA, Vanderlinden M, et al. Decoding paralinguistic signals: effect of semantic and prosodic cues on aphasic comprehension. J Commun Disord1982; 15: 223-231.
18.
18. Johnsrude IS, Penhune VB, Zatorre RR. Functional specificity in the right human auditory cortex for perceiving pitch direction. Brain2000; 123: 155-163.
19.
19. Zatorre RR, Berlin P. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex2001; 11: 946-953.
20.
20. Ross E, Orbelo D, Burgard M, Hansel S. Functional-anatomic correlates of aprosodic deficits in patients with right brain damage. Neurology1998; 50(suppl 4): A363.
21.
21. Blonder L, Bowers D, Heilman K. The role of the right hemisphere in emotional communication. Brain1991; 114: 1115-1127.
22.
22. Bowers D, Bauer R, Heilman K. The nonverbal affect lexicon: theoretical perspectives from neuropsychological studies of affect perception. Neuropsychology1993; 7: 433-444.
23.
23. Schmitt JJ, Hartje W, Willmes K. Hemispheric asymmetry in the recognition of emotional attitude conveyed by facial expression, prosody and propositional speech. Cortex1997; 33: 65-81.
24.
24. Testa J, Beatty W, Gleason A, et al. Impaired affective prosody in AD: relationship to aphasic deficits and emotional behaviors. Neurology2001; 57: 1474-1481.
25.
25. Monnot M, Nixon S, Lovallo W, Ross E. Altered emotional perception in alcoholics: deficits in affective prosody comprehension. Alcohol Clin Exp Res2001; 25: 362-369.
26.
26. Ross E, Burgard M, Hansel S, Swenson R. Leukoaraiosis is not associated with loss of interhemispheric functions or dementia. Neurology1997; 48(suppl 2): A168.
27.
27. Cohen ES, Brosgole L. Visual and auditory affect recognition in senile and normal elderly persons. Int J Neurosci1988; 43: 89-101.
28.
28. Brosgole L, Weisman. Mood recognition across the ages. Int J Neurosci1995; 82: 169-189.
29.
29. Oscar-Berman M, Hancock M, Mildworf B, et al. Emotional perception and memory in alcoholism and aging. Alcohol Clin Exp Res1990; 14: 383-393.
30.
30. Allen R, Brosgole L. Facial and auditory affect recognition in senile geriatrics, the normal elderly and young adults. Int J Neurosci1993; 68: 33-43.
31.
31. Kurucz J, Charbonneau R, Kurucz A, Ramsey P. Quantitative clinicopathologic study of senile dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc1981; 29: 158-163.
32.
32. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. “Mini-Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res1975; 12: 189-198.
33.
33. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia1971; 9: 97-113.
34.
34. Ross E, Orbelo D, Cartwright J, et al. Affective-prosodic deficits in schizophrenia: profiles of patients with brain damage and comparison with relation to schizophrenic symptoms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2001; 70: 597-604.
35.
35. Lenhardt ML. Factors in affective discrimination of speech. Neurology1978; 28: 309-310.
36.
36. Zatorre R, Evans A, Meyer E, Gjedde A. Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. Science1992; 256: 846-849.
37.
37. Willott JF. Aging and the auditory system anatomy, physiology, and psychophysics. San Diego, CA: Singular, 1991.
38.
38. Grady C, Craik F. Changes in memory processing with age. Curr Opin Neurobiol2000; 10: 224-231.
39.
39. Grady C. Brain imaging and age-related changes in cognition. Exp Gerontol1998; 33: 661-673.
40.
40. Horwitz B, McIntosh A, Haxby J, et al. Network analysis of PET-mapped visual pathways in Alzheimer type dementia. Neuroreport1995; 6: 2287-2292.
41.
41. Madden D, Turkington T, Provenzale J, et al. Adult age differences in the functional neuroanatomy of verbal recognition memory. Hum Brain Mapp1999; 7: 115-135.
42.
42. Grady C. Functional brain imaging and age-related changes in cognition. Biol Psychol2000; 54: 259-281.
44. Ross E. The aprosodias: functional-anatomic organization of the affective components of language in the right hemisphere. Arch Neurol1981; 38: 561-569.
45.
45. Gorelick PB, Ross ED. The aprosodias: further functionalanatomic evidence for the organization of affective language in the right hemisphere. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1987; 50: 553-560.
46.
46. Jonides J, Schumacher EH, Smith EE, et al. The role of parietal cortex in verbal working memory. J Neurosci1998; 18: 5026-5034.
47.
47. Baddeley A. Working memory. Science1992; 255: 556-559.
48.
48. Reuter-Lorenz PA. Cognitive neuropsychology of the aging brain. In: Park D, Schwarz N, eds. Cognitive aging, a primer. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 2000:93-114.
49.
49. Brown J, Jaffe J. Hypothesis on cerebral dominance. Neuropsychologia1975; 13: 107-110.
50.
50. Hutner N, Oscar-Berman M. Visual laterality patterns for the perception of emotional words in alcoholic and aging individuals. J Stud Alcohol1996; 57: 144-154.
51.
51. Levine S, Levy J. Perceptual asymmetry for chimeric faces across the life span. Brain Cogn1986; 5: 291-306.
52.
52. Moreno C, Borod JC, Welkowitz J, Alpert M. Lateralization for the expression and perception of facial emotion as a function of age. Neuropsychologia1990; 28: 199-209.
53.
53. Prodan C, Orbelo D, Ross E. Age-related differences in recognizing upper and lower facial displays of emotion. Neurology2001; 56(suppl 3): A188.
54.
54. Prodan C, Orbelo D, Testa J, Ross E. Hemispheric differences in recognizing upper and lower facial displays of emotion. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol2001; 14: 206-212.
55.
55. Mittenberg W, Seidenberg M, O’Leary DS, DiGiulio DV. Changes in cerebral functioning associated with normal aging. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol1989; 11: 918-932.
56.
56. Nocentini U, Goulet P, Drolet M, Joanette Y. Age-related evolution of the contribution of the right hemisphere to language: absence of evidence. Int J Neurosci1999; 99: 59-67.
57.
57. Greenwood P. The frontal aging hypothesis evaluated. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2000; 6: 705-726.
58.
58. McDowell CL, Harrison DW, Demaree HA. Is right hemisphere decline in the perception of emotion a function of aging? Int J Neurosci1994; 79: 1-11.
59.
59. Grunwald I, Borod J, Obler L, et al. The effects of age and gender on the perception of lexical emotion. Appl Neuropsychol1999; 6: 226-238.
