This article focuses on the social construction of femininity in a reality television program, America's Most Wanted. The program blurs fact and fiction in reenactments of actual crimes. The analysis focuses on its depiction of women crime victims. A prior study argues that the program empowers women to speak about their victimization. Other research suggests that such programs make women fearful. The authors compare episodes from the 1988-1989 and the 1995-1996 seasons. Although women spoke about their victimization, men spoke more often and presented master narratives about the crimes. In both seasons, the program imagery emphasized feminine vulnerability to violence from strange, devious, and brutal men and masculine technical expertise and authority as women's protection from such violence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barber, Deborah.
1991. Women, televised justice and state surveillance in crime reenactments: An examination of the feminine in “America's Most Wanted.” Paper presented at annual meetings of the Law & Society Association, July, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
2.
Benedict, Helen.
1992. Virgin or vamp: How the press covers sex crimes.New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bond-Maupin, Lisa.1998. That wasn't even me they showed: Women as criminals on America's Most Wanted.Journal of Violence against Women4:30-44.
4.
Cavender, Gray
, and Lisa Bond-Maupin.1993. Fear and loathing on reality television: An analysis of “America's Most Wanted,” and “Unsolved Mysteries.”Sociological Inquiry63:305-17.
5.
Cavender, Gray
, and Mark Fishman. 1998. Television reality crime programs: Context and history. In Entertaining crime: Reality crime television, edited by Mark Fishman and Gray Cavender.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
6.
Chermak, Steven.
1995. Victims in the news: Crime and the American media.Boulder, CO: Westview.
7.
Christie, Nils.
1986. The ideal victim. In From crime policy to victim policy, edited by E. A. Fattah.New York: St. Martin's.
8.
Connell, Robert.
1987. Gender and power.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Connell, Robert.1993. The big picture: Masculinities in recent world history.Theory and Society22:597-623.
10.
Curry, Kathleen. 1997. Mediating cops: An analysis of viewer reaction to reality TV. Master's thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe.
11.
D'Acci, Julie.
1994. Defining women: Television and the case of “Cagney and Lacey.”Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
12.
Davis, Donald.1990. Portrayals of women in prime-time network television: Some demographic characteristics.Sex Roles23:325-32.
13.
Dobash, Emerson
, Philip Schlesinger, Russell Dobash, and Kay Weaver. 1998. Crimewatch UK: Women's interpretations of televised violence. In Entertaining crime: Reality crime television, edited by Mark Fishman and Gray Cavender.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
14.
Ehrenreich, Barbara
, and Diedre English. 1978. For her own good: 150 years of the expert's advice to women.New York: Doubleday.
15.
Estrich, Susan.
1987. Real rape.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Ewick, Patricia
, and Susan Silbey.1995. Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Toward a sociology of narrative.Law & Society Review29:197-226.
17.
Faith, Karlene.
1993. Unruly women: The politics of confinement and resistance.Vancouver: Press Gang.
18.
Fishman, Mark.
1998. Ratings and reality: The persistence of the reality crime genre. In Entertaining crime: Reality crime television, edited by Mark Fishman and Gray Cavender.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
19.
Fiske, John.
1987. Television culture.New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
20.
Fiske, John.
1994. Media matters: Everyday culture and political change.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
Flanagan, Timothy
, and Kathleen Maquire. 1996. Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
22.
Fonow, Mary M.
, and Judith A. Cook. 1991. Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
23.
Greenfield, Jeff.1998. When facts alone won't do.New York Times, 2November, A22.
24.
Hammer, Jalna
, Jill Radford, and Elizabeth Stanko. 1989. Policing men's violence: An introduction. In Women, policing and male violence, edited by Jalna Hammer, Jill Radford, and Elizabeth Stanko.London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
25.
Harrington, Lee
, and Denise Bielby. 1995. Soap fans: Pursuing pleasure and making meaning in everyday life.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
26.
Humphries, Drew
, and Susan Caringella-MacDonald.1990. Murdered mothers, missing wives: Reconsidering female victimization.Social Justice17:71-89.
27.
Kozloff, Sara Ruth.
1987. Narrative theory and television. In Channels of discourse, edited by Robert Allen.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
28.
Lorber, Judith
, and Susan Farrell. 1991. The social construction of gender.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Madriz, Esther.1997. Images of criminals and victims: A study on women's fear and social control.Gender & Society11:342-56.
30.
Martin, Susan
, and Nancy Jurik. 1996. Doing justice, doing gender: Women in law and criminal justice occupations.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Messerschmidt, James.
1993. Masculinities and crime: Critique and reconceptualization of theory.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
32.
Meyers, Marian.
1997. News coverage of violence against women: Engendering blame.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Naples, Nancy.1997. The “new consensus” on the gendered “social contract”: The 1987-1988 U.S. congressional hearings on welfare reform.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society22:907-45.
34.
Press, Andrea.
1991. Women watching television: Gender, class, and generation in the American television experience.Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
35.
Rapping, Elayne.
1994. Media-tions: Forays into the culture and gender wars.Boston: South End.
36.
Riesman, Catherine Kohler.
1993. Narrative analysis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Schlesinger, Philip
, Emerson Dobash, Russell Dobash, and Kay Weaver. 1992. Women viewing violence.London: British Film Institute.
38.
Signorielli, Nancy.1989. Television and conceptions about sex roles: Maintaining conventionality and the status quo.Sex Roles21:341-60.
39.
Smart, Carol.
1989. Feminism and the power of law.London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
40.
Stanko, Elizabeth.
1985. Intimate intrusions: Women's experience of male violence.London: Unwin Hyman.
41.
Stanko, Elizabeth.
1990. Everyday violence: How women and men experience sexual and physical danger.London: Pandora.
42.
Stanko, Elizabeth.
1993. Ordinary fear: Women, violence and personal safety. In Violence against women: The bloody footprints, edited by Pauline Bart and Eileen Moran.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Surette, Ray.
1998. Media, crime, and criminal justice: Images and realities.2d ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
44.
Taylor, Ella.
1989. Prime-time families: Television culture in postwar America.Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
U.S. Department of Justice.
1991. Bureau of Justice statistics: Crime victimization in the United States.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
46.
U.S. Department of Justice.
1998. Bureau of Justice statistics: Criminal offenders: Summary findings for years 1990 and 1996 [Online]. Available: www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm.
47.
Walkowitz, Judith.1982. Jack the Ripper and the myth of male violence.Feminist Studies8:543-74.
48.
Warr, Mark.1984. Fear of victimization: Why are women and the elderly more afraid?Social Science Quarterly65:681-702.
49.
West, Candace
, and Sarah Fenstermaker.1995. Doing difference.Gender & Society9:8-37.
50.
West, Candace
, and Donald Zimmerman.1987. Doing gender.Gender & Society1:125-51.
