In this article, the authors argue that having daughters has the potential of sensitizing parents to issues of gender equity. Because parents invest a significant amount of themselves in their children, anticipated and actual struggles that their children face, and the public policies addressing those struggles, take on increased salience. We find that both fathers' and mothers' support for public policies designed to address gender equity increases when parents have daughters only. The findings are stronger for men, suggesting that child rearing might provide a mechanism for social change whereby fathers' connection with their daughters undermines their commitment to patriarchy. At the same time, when men have sons only, they show the least support for gender equity public policies, suggesting that wanting what is best for their children may keep men from challenging their patriarchal dividend.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ambert, Anne-Marie.
1992. The effect of children on parents.New York: Haworth Press.
2.
Baruch, G. K.
, and R. C. Barnett.1986. Consequences of fathers' participation in family work: Parents' role strain and well-being.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51:983-92.
3.
Bielby, William T.
, and Denise D. Bielby.1989. Family ties: Balancing commitments to work and family in dual earner households.American Sociological Review54:776-89.
4.
Boneparth, Ellen
, and Emily Stoper. 1988. Women, power and policy: Toward the year 2000.New York: Pergamon Press.
5.
Carroll, Susan J.
1985. Women as candidates in American politics.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
6.
Coltrane, Scott.
1996. Family man: Fatherhood, housework, and gender equity.New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Coltrane, Scott.
1998. Gender and families.Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
8.
Connell, R. W.
1995. Masculinities.Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Faulkner, Joseph
, and Gordon De Jong.1966. Religiosity in 5-D: An empirical analysis.Social Forces45:246-54.
10.
Gallagher, Sally
, and Christian Smith.1999. Symbolic traditionalism and pragmatic egalitarianism: Contemporary evangelicals, families and gender.Gender & Society13 (2): 211-33.
11.
Gerson, Kathleen.
1993. No man's land.New York: Basic Books.
12.
Hantover, Jeffery.1978. The Boy Scouts and the validation of masculinity.Journal of Social Issues34:184-95.
13.
Harris, K. M.
, and S. P. Morgan.1991. Fathers, sons, and daughters: Differential paternal involvement in parenting.Journal of Marriage and the Family53:531-44.
14.
Katzev, Aphra
, Rebecca L. Warner, and Alan Acock.1994. Girls or boys? Relationship of child gender to marital instability.Journal of Marriage and the Family56:89-100.
15.
Kielcolt, K. J.
, and Alan Acock.1988. The long-term effects of family structure on gender role attitudes.Journal of Marriage and the Family50:709-17.
16.
Kimmel, Michael.
1996. Manhood in America: A cultural history.New York: Free Press.
17.
Klein, Ethel.
1984. Gender politics.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Morgan, S. P.
, D. N. Lye, and G. A. Condran.1988. Sons, daughters, and the risk of marital disruption.American Journal of Sociology94:110-29.
19.
Pleck, Joseph.
1985. Working wives/working husbands.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Plutzer, Eric.1988. Work life, family life, and women's support for feminism.American Sociological Review53:640-49.
21.
Reeves, M. M.1990. The state as polities: Reformed, reinvigorated, resourceful.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science509:83-93.
22.
Risman, Barbara J.
1998. Gender vertigo: American families in transition.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Smith, Tom.1985. Working wives and women's rights: The connection between employment status of wives and the feminist attitudes of husbands.Sex Roles12:501-8.
24.
Stacey, Judith.
1991. Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late twentieth century America.New York: Basic Books.
25.
Steel, Brent
, and Nicholas P. Lovrich.1996. Public personnel management in county government: Keeping up with the times?Review of Public Personnel Administration16:32-56.
26.
Steel, Brent
, Rebecca L. Warner, Nicholas Lovrich, and John Pierce.1992. The Inglehart-Flanagan debate over postmaterialist values: Some evidence from a Canadian-American case study.Political Psychology13:61-77.
27.
Steel, Brent
, Rebecca L. Warner, Blair Stieber, and Nicholas Lovrich.1992. Postmaterialist values and support for feminism among Canadian and American women and men.Western Political Quarterly45:339-54.
28.
Terkildsen, Nayda
, and Frauke Schnell.1997. How media frames move public opinion: An analysis of the women's movement.Political Research Quarterly50:879-900.
29.
Thornton, Arland
, Duane Alwin, and Donald Camburn.1983. Causes and consequences of sex-role attitudes and change.American Sociological Review48:211-17.
30.
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue.
1992. Gender consciousness and politics.New York: Routledge.
31.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.
1994. Statistical abstract of the United States.114th ed.Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
32.
Warner, Rebecca.1991. Does the sex of your children matter? Support for feminism among women and men in the United States and Canada.Journal of Marriage and the Family53:1051-56.
33.
Wilcox, Clyde.1987. Religious attitudes and anti-feminism: An analysis of the moral majority.Women and Politics7:59-77.
34.
Wilson, John.
1983. Religion in American society.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
