This investigation places recent research about changes in wives' and husbands' domestic labor in the context of well-known reporting differences between different kinds of housework surveys. An analysis of the “reporting gap” between direct-question reports of housework hours from the National Survey of Families and Households (1988) and time-diary reports from Americans' Use of Time, 1985, shows that both husbands and wives overreport their housework contributions. Furthermore, gender attitudes, total housework, class, education, income, family size, and employment status together significantly affect the overreport, although the variables operate in different ways for wives and husbands. It is concluded that changing and uneven social perceptions of the appropriate domestic roles of women and men have resulted in reporting biases that do not necessarily correspond to actual changes in housework behavior. These findings cast doubt on claims that contemporary husbands are doing more housework than their predecessors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berk, Richard A.1983. An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data.American Sociological Review48 (3): 386-98.
2.
Bianchi, Suzanne M.
, and Daphne Spain. 1986. American women in transition.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3.
Bumpass, Larry
, and James Sweet. 1985. The National Survey of Families and Households.Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Demography and Ecology.
4.
Coverman, Shelley W.1983. Gender, domestic labor time, and wage inequality.American Sociological Review48:623-37.
5.
Coverman, Shelley W.
1989. Women's work is never done: The division of domestic labor. In Women: A feminist perspective, 4th ed., edited by Jo Freeman.Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
6.
Coverman, Shelley W.
, and Joseph F. Sheley.1986. Change in men's housework and child-care time, 1965-1975.American Sociological Review48:413-22.
7.
Davis, Margaret R.
1983. Families in a working world: The impact of organizations on domestic life.New York: Praeger.
8.
Fenstermaker Berk, Sarah
, and Anthony Shih. 1980. Contributions to household labor: Comparing wives' and husbands' reports. In Women and household labor, edited by Sarah Fenstermaker Berk.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Gershuny, Jonathan
, and John P. Robinson.1988. Historical changes in the household division of labor.Demography25 (4): 537-52.
10.
Granbois, Donald H.
, and Ronald P. Willett.1970. Equivalence of family role measures based on husband and wife data.Journal of Marriage and the Family32 (1): 68-72.
11.
Heckman, James J.1976. The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models.Annals of Economic and Social Measurement5:475-92.
12.
Hill, M.
1985. Patterns of time use. In Time, goods and well-being, edited by F. T. Juster and F. P. Stafford.Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Science Research.
13.
Hochschild, Arlie
, with Anne Machung. 1989. The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home.New York: Viking.
14.
Jaccard, James
, Robert Turrisi, and Choi K. Wan. 1990. Interaction effects in multiple regression.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Juster, F. Thomas
, and F. P. Stafford.1991. Comment.Public Opinion Quarterly55 (3): 347-56.
16.
Juster, F. Thomas
, and F. P. Stafford. 1985. Time, goods, and well-being.Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
17.
Lennon, Mary Clare
, and Sarah Rosenfield.1994. Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options.American Journal of Sociology100 (2): 506-31.
18.
Maddala, G. S.
1983. Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Marini, Margaret Mooney
, and Beth Anne Shelton.1993. Measuring household work: Recent experience in the United States.Social Science Research22 (4): 361-82.
20.
Pleck, Joseph H.
1985. Working wives/Working husbands.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Robinson, John P.
1977. How Americans use time: A social psychological analysis of everyday behavior.New York: Praeger.
22.
Robinson, John P.
1980. Housework technology and household work. In Women and household labor, edited by S. F. Berk.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Robinson, John P.
1985a. Americans' use of time, 1985 computer file.College Park: University of Maryland, Survey Research Center (producer, 1992). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor, 1993).
24.
Robinson, John P.
1985b. The validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measurers. In Time, goods, and well-being, edited by F. T. Juster and F. P. Stafford.Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
25.
Robinson, John P.1988. Who's doing the housework?American Demographics10:24-28, 63.
26.
Sapiro, Virginia.1991. Feminism: A generation later.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences514:10-22.
27.
Scheuch, Erwin K.
1972. The time budget interview. In The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries, edited by Alexander Szalai.The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
28.
Simon, Rita J.
, and Jean M. Landis.1989. The polls—a report: Women's and men's attitudes about a woman's place and role.Public Opinion Quarterly55:265-77.
29.
Stafford, Frank P.1980. Women's use of time converging with men's.Monthly Labor Review103 (December): 57-59.
30.
Stein, Peter.1984. Men in families.Marriage and Family Review7 (fall/winter): 143-62.
31.
Sweet, James
, Larry Bumpass, and Vaughn Call. 1988. The design and content of the National Survey of Families and Households. Working Paper NSFH-1, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
32.
Szalai, Alexander.1966. The multinational comparative time budget research project.American Behavioral Scientist9:1-20.
33.
Tuma, Nancy B.
1982. Nonparametric and partially parametric approaches to event-history analysis. In Sociological Methodology, edited by Samuel Leinhardt.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
U.S. Census Bureau.
1960. Historical statistics of the U.S.Washington, DC: GPO.
35.
U.S. Census Bureau.
1970. 1970 census of population: Occupational characteristics. PC(2)-7A.Washington, DC: GPO.
36.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
1991. Working women: A chartbook. Bulletin 2385. Washington, DC: GPO.
37.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
1993. Employment and earnings 41 (1). Washington, DC: GPO.
38.
Walker, Kathryn.1968. Homemaking still takes time.Journal of Home Economics61:621-27.
39.
Warner, Rebecca L.1986. Alternative strategies for measuring household diviion of labor.Journal of Family Issues7 (2): 179-95.
40.
Warrick, Pamela.1994. Meet the masters of the new universe.The Los Angeles Times, 18November.
