Mandatory workfare has been the centerpiece of welfare reform in this decade. In 1992-94, there was a pitched legislative battle over mandatory workfare in Vermont. Feminist organizations mobilized to oppose the mandatory work requirement, producing data to substantiate the claims that women's jobs did not pay enough to purchase basic needs for their families, that unemployment remained a serious problem for single mothers, and that in states where workfare had already been adopted, it did not raise families out of poverty. Vermont's original bill was made less punitive for welfare recipients in some significant respects as a result of the debate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramovitz, Mimi.
1988. Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present.Boston: South End Press.
2.
Azrieli, Donna.
1992. Welfare reform: A report for the Governor's Commission on Women. Report, summer, Montpelier, VT.
3.
Burk, Martha
, and Heidi Hartmann.1996. Beyond the gender gap.The Nation, 10June, pp. 18-21.
4.
Burleigh, Carolyn
, Sally Conrad, and Joan Smith. 1993. Welfare reform and its costs. Report, November, Burlington, VT.
5.
Burtless, Gary.1990. The economist's lament: Public assistance in America.Journal of Economic Perspectives4 (1): 57-78.
6.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
1996. The new welfare law.Washington, DC: Author.
7.
Center on Social Welfare Policy and Law. 1995. Summary of AFDC waiver activity since February 1993. Publication No. 169-2, April, New York.
8.
Child support money is up but far short.1994. New York Times, 7January, p. A14.
9.
Clergy voices its opposition to “workfare.”1993. Rutland Herald, 30March.
10.
Congressional Information Service.
1993. 1991 AFDC recipient characteristics study.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
11.
Coontz, Stephanie.
1992. The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap.New York: Basic Books.
12.
Edin, Kathryn
, and Laura Lein. 1997. Making ends meet: The survival strategies of low income mothers.New York: Russell Sage.
13.
Fakirananda, Mira.
1992. RE: The subject of welfare reform: One concrete suggestion.Letter to the Governor's Commission on Women, 20 July, Burlington, VT.
14.
Fogg, Neeta P.
, Paul E. Harrington, and Andrew M. Sum. 1993. The employment, earnings and public assistance status of single mothers in Vermont. Report, March, Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.
15.
Funiciello, Theresa.
1993. Tyranny of kindness: Dismantling the welfare system to end poverty in America.New York: Atlantic Monthly.
16.
Gueron, Judith M.1990. Work and welfare: Lessons on employment programs.Journal of Economic Perspectives4 (1): 79-98.
17.
Harrington, Michael.
1984. The new American poverty.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
18.
Heritage Foundation. 1990. How “poor” are America's poor? Backgrounder No. 791, 21 September.
19.
Hogan, Cornelius. 1992. Letter to Advisory Committee, Governor's Commission on Women.
20.
Kaus, Mickey.
1986. The work ethic state.The New Republic, pp. 22-33.
21.
Laurie. 1992. Laurie speaks about life as a mother receiving welfare. Testimony to Governor's Commission on the Status of Women, 6 November, Montpelier, VT.
22.
Livingston, Joy
, and Elaine McCrate. 1993. Women and economic development in Vermont: A study for the Governor's Commission on Women.Montpelier, VT: Governor's Commission on Women.
23.
McCrate, Elaine
, and Laura Leete.1994. Racial wage differentials among young women, 1976-1986.Industrial Relations33 (April): 168-83.
24.
Mead, Lawrence.
1992. The new politics of poverty: The nonworking poor in America.New York: Basic Books.
25.
Mitchell, Alison.1995. For Clinton, a litmus test: How far to go on welfare?New York Times, 20November, p. A1.
26.
Mitchell, Alison.1996. Clinton calls for schooling of mothers on welfare.New York Times, 5May.
27.
Murray, Charles.
1984. Losing ground: American social policy 1950-1980.New York: Basic Books.
28.
Pear, Robert.1996. Clinton endorses the most radical of welfare trials.New York Times, 19May, p. 1.
29.
Pearce, Diana.
1990. Welfare is not for women: Why the War on Poverty cannot conquer the feminization of poverty. In Women, the state and welfare, edited by Linda Gordon.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
30.
Peters, H. Elizabeth
, Laura M. Argys, Eleanor E. Maccoby, and Robert H. Mnookin.1993. Enforcing divorce settlements: Evidence from child support compliance and award modifications.Demography30 (November): 719-36.
31.
Piven, Frances Fox
, and Richard A. Cloward. 1971. Regulating the poor: The functions of public welfare.New York: Random House.
32.
Quadagno, Jill.
1994. The color of welfare: How racism undermined the War on Poverty.New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Renwick, Trudi J.
, and Barbara R. Bergmann.1993. A budget-based definition of poverty, with an application to single-parent families.Journal of Human Resources28 (1): 1-24.
34.
Spalter-Roth, Roberta
, Beverly Burr, Lois Shaw, and Heidi Hartmann. 1995. Welfare that works. Research Report, Institute for Women's Policy Research, Washington, DC.
35.
Stacey, Judith.
1996. In the name of the family: Rethinking family values in the postmodern age.Boston: Beacon.
36.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
1992. Geographic profiles of employment and unemployment, 1991, Bulletin 2410, August.
37.
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means.
1992. Green book: Background material and data on programs within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38.
Vermont Agency of Human Services.
1992. A foundation for change: Moving toward family independence. March, Waterbury, VT.
39.
Vermont Agency of Human Services.
1993. Data on female-headed families released. Press Release, March, Department of Social Welfare.
40.
Vermont Department of Employment and Training.
1994-95. New applications for unemployment insurance.
41.
Walsh, Molly.1997. Vermont's welfare approach shaky.Burlington Freepress, 10February, p. 1.
42.
Zedlewski, Shiela
, Sandra Clark, Eric Meier, and Keith Watson. 1996. Potential effects of Congressional welfare reform legislation on family incomes.Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
