Recent debates between modernists and postmodernists have shaken the foundations of modern social science. The epistemological assumptions of long-established procedures for constructing and validating knowledge claims have been called into question. This article discusses how two major contributors to the “new feminist epistemologies”—Dorothy Smith and Patricia Hill Collins—selectively integrate premises of modernist and postmodernist thought into their standpoint approaches. However, the particular premises they select result in significant ontological and epistemological differences between their works. These differences reflect major controversies over materialism versus idealism, as well as essentialism versus diversity. As such, these different standpoints have important implications for feminist scholarship and political practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alcoff, Linda
, and Elizabeth Potter, eds. 1993. Feminist epistemologies.New York: Routledge.
2.
Andersen, Margaret
, and Patricia Hill Collins, eds. 1995. Race, class and gender: An anthology.2d ed.New York: Wadsworth.
Bar On, Bat-Ami.
1993. Marginality and epistemic privilege. In Feminist epistemologies, edited by Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter.New York: Routledge.
5.
Bologh, Roslyn Wallach
, and Leonard Mell.1994. Modernism, postmodernism, and the new world (dis)order: A dialectical analysis and alternative.Critical Sociology20 (2): 81-119.
6.
Cheal, David.
1991. Family and the state of theory.New York: Harvester, Wheatsheaf.
7.
Collins, Patricia Hill.1986. Learning from the outsider-within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought.Social Problems33:14-32.
8.
Collins, Patricia Hill.
1990. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment.Boston: Unwin, Hyman.
9.
Collins, Patricia Hill.1994. Review ofBreaking bread: Insurgent Black intellectual life and Segregated sisterhood: Racism and the politics of American feminism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society20 (1): 176-79.
10.
Combahee River Collective.
1977. A Black feminist statement. In Feminist frameworks: Alternative theoretical accounts of the relations between women and men, edited by Alison Jaggar and Paula Rothenberg.New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Gottfried, Heidi
, ed. 1996. Feminism and social change: Bridging theory and practice.Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
12.
Gorelick, Sherry.
1996. Contradictions of feminist methodology. In Feminism and social change: Bridging theory and practice, edited by Heidi Gottfried.Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
13.
Haraway, Donna.1988. Situated knowledge: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.Feminist Studies14:575-600.
14.
Haraway, Donna.
1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature.New York: Routledge.
15.
Harding, Sandra.
1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge: Thinking from women's lives.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
Harding, Sandra.
1993. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is strong objectivity? In Feminist epistemologies, edited by Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter.New York: Routledge.
17.
Hartsock, Nancy.
1983. The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives in epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science, edited by Sandra Harding and Merill Nintikka.Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
18.
Hartsock, Nancy.
1996. Theoretical bases for coalition building: An assessment of postmodernism. In Feminism and social change: Bridging theory and practice, edited by Heidi Gottfried.Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
19.
hooks, bell.
1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center.Boston: South End Press.
20.
Keller, Evelyn Fox.
1992. Secrets of life, secrets of death.New York: Routledge.
21.
Kuhn, Thomas.
1962. The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Lemert, Charles
, ed. 1993. Social theory: The multicultural & classic readings.Boulder, CO: Westview.
23.
Lengermann, Patricia Madoo
, and Jill Niebrugge-Brantley. 1996. Contemporary feminist theory. In Sociological theory, by George Ritzer.New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rosenau, Pauline Marie.
1992. Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Smith, Dorothy E.
1979. A sociology of women. In The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge, edited by Julia A. Sherman and Evelyn Torton Beck.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
27.
Smith, Dorothy E.
1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology.Boston: Northeastern University Press.
28.
Smith, Dorothy E.
1990a. The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge.Boston: Northeastern University Press.
29.
Smith, Dorothy E.
1990b. Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling.New York: Routledge.
30.
Smith, Dorothy E.1993. High noon in textland: A critique of Clough.Sociological Quarterly34 (1): 183-92.
31.
Smith, Dorothy E.
1995. Politically correct: An ideological code. In Beyond political correctness: Toward the inclusive university, edited by Stephen Richer and Lorna Weir.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
32.
Smith, Dorothy E.
1996a. Contradictions for feminist social scientists. In Feminism and social change: Bridging theory and practice, edited by Heidi Gottfried.Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
33.
Smith, Dorothy E.1996b. Telling the truth after postmodernism.Symbolic Interaction19 (3): 171-202.
34.
Stanley, Liz
, and Sue Wise. 1990. Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research processes. In Feminist praxis: Research, theory, and epistemology in feminist sociology, edited by Liz Stanley.New York: Routledge.
35.
Walker, Alice.
1983. In search of our mothers' gardens.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
36.
Wenger, Morton G.1994. Idealism redux: The class-historical truth of postmodernism.Critical Sociology20:53-78.
