Analysis of the local implementation of paternity establishment and child support policy in four Wisconsin counties suggests that these policies reproduce some aspects of patriarchal gender relations. The counties' information-collecting practices focused on nonmarital mothers' sexual activity and nonmarital fathers' employment and income. Women were questioned far more extensively than men about their sexual practices and partners; women's accounts of their sexual activity were used to evaluate their overall truthfulness, and administrative practices in effect encouraged alleged fathers to state whether they were convinced of the mother's sexual fidelity. By demonstrating the gendered nature of the terms under which public assistance is granted, the findings highlight the significance of the process of policy implementation for understanding the gendered character of state systems of social provision.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramovitz, Mimi.
1988. Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present.Boston: South End.
2.
Brown, Carol.
1981. Mothers, fathers, and children: From private to public patriarchy. In Women and revolution: A discussion of the unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism, edited by Lydia Sargent.Boston: South End.
3.
Collins, Patricia Hill.
1990. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment.Boston: Unwin Hyman.
4.
Connell, R. W.
1987. Gender and power.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Ellwood, David T.
1988. Poor support: Poverty in the American family.New York: Basic Books.
6.
Fineman, Martha A.
1991. The illusion of equality: The rhetoric and reality of divorce reform.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Fraser, Nancy.
1989. Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
Garfinkel, Irwin
, and Sara McLanahan. 1986. Single mothers and their children: A new American dilemma.Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
9.
Gordon, Linda.
1988. Heroes of their own lives: The politics and history of family violence.New York: Viking.
10.
Gordon, Linda.
1994. Pitied but not entitled: Single mothers and the history of welfare.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Jonasdottir, Anna G.
1994. Why women are oppressed.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
12.
MacKinnon, Catherine A.
1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
McLanahan, Sara
, and Karen Booth.1989. Mother-only families: Problems, prospects, and politics.Journal of Marriage and the Family51 (3):557-80.
14.
Mink, Gwendolyn.
1990. The lady and the tramp: Gender, race, and the origins of the American welfare state. In Women, the state and welfare, edited by Linda Gordon.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
15.
Misra, Joya
, and Frances Akins. 1996. Feminist theories of the welfare state: Structure, agency, and diversity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Society, August, New York.
16.
Monson, Renée A.
1997. Sexually transmitted truths: How child support workers conduct paternity interviews. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Sociological Society, Des Moines.
17.
Nelson, Barbara J.
1990. The origins of the two-channel welfare state: Workmen's Compensation and Mothers' Aid. In Women, the state, and welfare, edited by Linda Gordon.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
18.
Nichols-Casebolt, Ann.1988. Paternity adjudication: In the best interests of the out-of-wedlock child.Child Welfare67(6): 245-54.
19.
O'Connor, Julia.1993. Gender, class and citizenship in the comparative analysis of welfare state regimes: Theoretical and methodological issues.British Journal of Sociology44:501-18.
20.
Orloff, Ann Shola.1993. Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states.American Sociological Review58 (3):303-28.
21.
Pateman, Carole.
1988. The patriarchal welfare state. In Democracy and the welfare state, edited by Amy Guttman.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Petchesky, Rosalind.
1990. Abortion and woman's choice: The state, sexuality, and reproductive freedom.2nd ed.Boston: Northeastern University Press.
23.
Piven, Frances Fox.
1985. Women and the state: Ideology, power, and the welfare state. In Gender and the life course, edited by Alice S. Rossi.New York: Aldine.
24.
Quadagno, Jill.
1994. The color of welfare: How racism undermined the War on Poverty.New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Sarvasy, Wendy.1992. Postsuffrage feminism, citizenship, and the quest for a feminist welfare state.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society17:329-62.
26.
Shaver, Sheila.
1990. Gender, social policy regimes and the welfare state. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, D. C.
27.
Skocpol, Theda.
1988. The limits of the New Deal system and the roots of contemporary welfare dilemmas. In The politics of social policy in the United States, edited by Margaret Weir, Ann Shola Orloff, and Theda Skocpol.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Skocpol, Theda.
1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Trattner, Walter I.
1989. From poor law to welfare state: A history of social welfare in America.4th ed.New York: Free Press.
30.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.
1990. 1990 census of population, social and economic characteristics, Wisconsin.Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
31.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.
1995. Child support for custodial mothers and fathers: 1991. Current Population Reports, Series P60-187. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
32.
Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services.
1993a. Maternal and child health statistics, Wisconsin 1993.Madison: Wisconsin Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health.
33.
Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services.
1993b. Vital statistics Wisconsin 1993.Madison: Wisconsin Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health, Center for Health Statistics.
