Feminist scholarship on the relative importance of working-class institutional strength in the economy and in the state has led to two divergent conclusions. Radical feminists argue that working-class institutions dominated by men produce male-biased outcomes; socialist feminists hold that working-class institutions promote classwide interests that benefit women as well as men. This article addresses this debate by applying generic and gendered working-class strength models of the welfare state in an examination of women's public pension quality. Quality is measured as women's average pension (1) compared with that of men, (2) relative to women's average earnings, and (3) compared with the average wage in the society. The authors find support for the socialist feminist view. Working-class institutions, having historically organized and represented the interests of working men, benefit women by improving the security and adequacy of their retirement incomes, but it is women's access to working-class economic and political institutions that brings greater economic equality with men in old age.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acker, Joan.1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations.Gender & Society4:139-59.
2.
Acker, Joan.1991. Thinking about wages: The gendered wage gap in Swedish banks.Gender & Society5:390-408.
3.
Banks, Arthur S.
, and William Overstreet, eds. 1945-87. Political handbook of the world.New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Barrett, Michele.
1984. Unity is strength? Feminism and the labor movement. In Women and the public sphere: A critique of sociology and politics, edited by Janet Siltanen and Michelle Stanworth. New York: St. Martin.
5.
Beedon, Laurel E.
1991. Women and Social Security: Challenges facing the American system of social insurance. Issue Brief, no. 2. Washington, DC: Public Policy Institute of AARP.
6.
Berkowitz, Edward D.1991. How to think about the welfare state.Labor History32:489-502.
7.
Brooks, J. E.1983. Left-wing mobilization and socioeconomic equality.Comparative Political Studies16:393-416.
8.
Campbell, R.
1982. Income maintenance. In The direction of federal legislation affecting women over forty, edited by M. R. Block. College Park, MD: National Policy Center on Women and Aging.
9.
Cleary, Paul D.
, and Ronald Angel.1984. The analysis of relationships involving dichotomous dependent variables.Journal of Health and Social Behavior25:334-38.
10.
Derthick, Martha.
1979. Policy-making for Social Security.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
11.
Eduards, Maud.
1981. Sweden. In The politics of the second electorate: Women and public participation, edited by Joni Lovenduski and Jill Hills. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12.
Flowers, Marilyn R.
1977. Women and Social Security: An institutional dilemma.Washington, DC: American Institute for Public Policy Research.
13.
Gordon, Linda.1992. Social insurance and public assistance: The influence of gender in welfare thought in the United States, 1890-1935.American Historical Review97:19-55.
14.
Hernes, Helga Maria.
1984. Women and the welfare state: The transition from private to public dependence. In Patriarchy in a welfare society, edited by Harriett Holter. Irvington-Hudson, NY: Columbia University Press.
15.
Hernes, Helga Maria.
1987. Welfare state and woman power: Essays in state feminism.London: Norwegian University Press.
16.
Hunt, Pauline.
1984. Workers side by side: Women and the trade movement. In Women and the public sphere, edited by Janet Siltanen and Michelle Stanworth. New York: St. Martin.
17.
International Labour Organization.
1985. Yearbook of labour statistics.Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.
18.
International Labour Organization.
1987a. World labor report, 1-2.New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
International Labour Organization.
1987b. Yearbook of labour statistics.Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.
20.
Key, V. O.
1949. Southern politics.New York: Alfred Knopf.
21.
Korpi, Walter
, and Michael Shalev. 1980. Strikes, power and politics in the Western nations, 1900-1976. In Political power and social theory, edited by Maurice Zeitlin. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
22.
Koven, Seth
, and Sonya Michel.1990. Womanly duties: Maternalist politics and the origins of welfare states in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States, 1880-1920.American Historical Review95:1076-109.
23.
Lovenduski, Joni.
1986. Women and European politics: Contemporary feminism and public policy.Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
24.
Mackie, Thomas T.
, and Richard Rose. 1991. The international almanac of electoral history.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
25.
Myles, John.
1984. Old age in the welfare state: The political economy of public pensions.Boston: Little Brown.
26.
Myles, John.
1989. Old age in the welfare state: The political economy of public pensions.Rev. ed.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
27.
Norris, Pippa.
1987. Politics and sexual equality: The comparative position of women in western democracies.Boulder, CO: Rienner.
28.
Pateman, Carole.
1988. The patriarchal welfare state. In Democracy and the welfare state, edited by A. Gutmann. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Peace, Sheila M.
1986. The forgotten female: Social policy and older women. In Aging and social policy: A critical assessment, edited by Chris Phillipson and Alan Walker. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
30.
Quadagno, Jill.1988. Women's access to pensions and the structure of eligibility rules: Systems of production and reproduction.Sociological Quarterly29:541-58.
31.
Ruggie, Mary.
1984. The state and working women: A comparative study of Britain and Sweden.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Schneider, Saundra.1982. The sequential development of social programs in eighteen welfare states.Comparative Social Research5:195-220.
33.
Shalev, Michael.1983. The social democratic model and beyond: Two generations of comparative research on the welfare state.Comparative Social Research6:315-52.
34.
Stephens, John D.
1986. The transition from capitalism to socialism.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
35.
Tracy, Martin B.
, and Roxanne L. Ward.1986. Trends in old-age pensions for women: Benefit levels in ten nations, 1960-1980.The Gerontologist26:286-91.
36.
Troy, Leo
and Neil Sheflin. 1985. U.S. union sourcebook: membership, finances, structure, directory.West Orange, NJ.: IRDIS.
37.
United Nations. General Assembly.
1985. Fortieth Session. Official Records. Supplement 45. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women.Prepared by Committee on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women in pursuance of UN General Assembly Resolution 34/I80 of Dec. 18, 1979, A/40/45.
38.
United Nations. General Assembly.
Secretary-General. 1985. The World Conference to Review and Appraise the Achievements of the United Nations Decade for Women Equality, Development and Peace. Report of the Secretary-General in pursuance of Decision 1983/132 of the Economic and Social Council and Resolution 38/108 of the General Assembly, Nairobi, July 15-26, 116/10.
39.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
1985. Social security programs throughout the world.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
40.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
1986. Social Security Bulletin Annual Statistical Supplement 1986, p.105. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
41.
Walker, Alan.
1987. The poor relation: Poverty among old women. In Women and poverty in Britain, edited by Caroline Glendinning and Jane Millar. Sussex, England: Wheatsheaf Books.
42.
Wharton, Amy S.1991. Structure and agency in socialist feminist theory.Gender & Society5:373-89.
