Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bologh, Roslyn Wallach.
1992 . The promise and failure of ethnomethodology from a feminist perspective.
Gender & Society
6 :199 -206 .
2.
Denzin, Norman K.
1990 . Harold and Agnes: A feminist narrative undoing.
Sociological Theory
8 :198 -216 .
3.
Denzin, Norman K.
1991 . Back to Harold and Agnes.
Sociological Theory
9 :280 -85 .
4.
Garfinkel, Harold.
1967. Studies in ethnomethodology.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
5.
Hilbert, Richard A.
1991 . Norman and Sigmund: Comment on Denzin's “Harold and Agnes.”
Sociological Theory
9 :264 -68 .
6.
Lynch, Michael
, and
David Bogen.
1991 . In defense of Dada-driven analysis.
Sociological Theory
9 :269 -76 .
7.
Maynard, Douglas W.
1991 . Goffman, Garfinkel, and games.
Sociological Theory
9 :269 -76 .
8.
Rich, Adrienne.
1986. Blood, bread, and poetry: Selected prose, 1979-1985.
New York : Norton.
9.
Zimmerman, Don H.
1992 . They all were doing gender, but they weren't all passing: Comment on Rogers.
Gender & Society
6 :192 -98 .