In the deviance literature, sexual assaults at work have not been given the sustained attention that harm to property or violation of production guidelines has received. This omission suggests that sexual harassment is considered normative and that when women fail to accommodate this reality, it is the survivor rather than the perpetrator who is considered deviant. This article reports on 64 cases of attempted or completed rape in a sample of heterosexual and lesbian women workers in a wide range of occupations. Two atypical responses, quitting the job or filing a complaint as a result of a workplace sexual assault, highlight the process by which informal deviance defining occurs in everyday interactions at work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adam, Barry D.
1978. The survival of domination: Interiorization and everyday life.New York: Elsevier.
2.
Alliance Against Sexual Coercion.1981. Organizing against sexual harassment.Radical America15 (July/August): 17-34.
3.
Bart, Pauline B.
, and Patricia H. O'Brien. 1985. Stopping rape: Successful survival strategies.New York: Pergamon.
4.
Beldin, Linda.1979. Why women do not report sexual assault.Aegis: Magazine on Ending Violence Against Women (September-October):38-43.
5.
Benson, Donna J.
, and Greg E. Thomson.1982. Sexual harassment on a university campus: The confluence of authority relations, sexual interest, and gender stratification.Social Problems29:236-51.
6.
Brewer, Marilynn B.1982. Further beyond nine to five: An integration and future directions.Journal of Social Issues38:149-58.
7.
Brodsky, Carroll.
1976. Rape at work. In Sexual assault: The victim and the rapist, edited by M. Walker and S. Brodsky. Lexington, MA: D. C. Health.
8.
Crocker, Phyllis.1983. An analysis of university definitions of sexual harassment.Signs8:696-707.
9.
Feds in a pinch.1988. Playboy, December, p. 64.
10.
Holmstrom, Lynda Lytle
, and Ann Wolbert Burgess. 1978. The victim of rape: Institutional reactions.New York: Wiley.
11.
Jensen, Inger
, and Barbara Gutek.1982. Attributions and assignment of responsibility for sexual harassment.Journal of Social Issues38:121-36.
12.
Kelly, Liz.
1988. Surviving sexual violence.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
Livingston, Joy A.1982. Responses to sexual harassment on the job: Legal, organizational, and individual actions.Journal of Social Issues38:5-22.
14.
Loh, W. W.1981. What has reform of rape legislation wrought?Journal of Social Issues37:28-52.
15.
Lott, Bernice
, Mary Ellen Reilly, and Dale R. Howard.1982. Sexual assault and harassment: A campus community case study.Signs8:296-319.
16.
MacKinnon, Catharine.
1979. Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
MacKinnon, Catharine.
1987. Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Martin, Susan Ehrlich.
1980. Breaking and entering: Policewomen on patrol.Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
Reilly, Timothy
, Sandra Carpenter, Valerie Dull, and Kim Bartlett.1982. The factorial survey: An approach to defining sexual harassment on campus.Journal of Social Issues38:99-110.
20.
Russell, Diana
, and Nancy Howell.1983. The prevalence of rape in the United States revisited.Signs8:688-95.
21.
Safran, Claire.1976. What men do to women on the job: A shocking look at sexual harassment.Redbook, November, 149.
22.
Schneider, Beth.1982. Consciousness about sexual harassment among heterosexual and lesbian women workers.Journal of Social Issues38:75-97.
23.
Schneider, Beth.1984. The office affair: Myth and reality for heterosexual and lesbian women workers.Sociological Perspectives27:443-64.
24.
Schneider, Beth.1985. Approaches, assaults, attractions, affairs: The policy implications of the sexualization of the workplace.Population Research and Policy Review4 (July): 93-113.
25.
Schram, Donna D.
1978. Rape. In The victimization of women, edited by Jane Roberts Chapman and Margaret Gates. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
Schur, Edwin M.
1984. Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma and social control.New York: Random House.
27.
Sebba, Leslie
, and Sorel Cahan. 1975. Sex offenses: The genuine and the doubted victim. In Victimology: A new focus, edited by I. Drapkin and E. Viano. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
28.
Silverman, Deirdre.1976. Sexual harassment: Working women's dilemma.Quest: A Feminist Quarterly10:346-57.
29.
Tangri, Sandra
, Martha R. Burt, and Leanor Boulin Johnson.1982. Sexual harassment at work: Three exploratory models.Journal of Social Issues38:33-54.
30.
United States Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB).
1981. Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem?Washington, DC: GPO.
31.
Weber-Burden, Eleanor
, and Peter H. Rossi.1982. Defining sexual harassment on campus: A replication and extension.Journal of Social Issues38:111-20.
32.
Weis, Kurt
, and Sandra Borges. 1975. Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. In Rape victimology, edited by LeRoy G. Schultz. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
33.
Williams, Karen M.
1976. The effect of victim characteristics on the disposition of violent crime. In Criminal justice and the victim, edited by William F. McDonald. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
